Chapter 6. The development of a taxonomy of verbal disagreements in the light of the p-model
The main objective of this chapter is to find a category system that is the most capable of describing Hungarian disagreement based on certain criteria set beforehand. As none of the rival approaches to disagreement to be introduced in this chapter seem to satisfy each criterion, a new taxonomy is proposed. Distinguishing between strategies and pragmatic force modifiers (PFMs), this new category system is more reliable and more capable of capturing the complex nature of (Hungarian) disagreements that the rival models. A detailed description of the metatheoretical research is provided including a step-by-step description of the analytical procedure(s) employed. By describing each step of the research along with the decisions and re-evaluations of the information at hand as well as the p-context, the chapter demonstrates the cyclic, retrospective and prismatic nature of the plausible argumentation process.
References (38)
Aijmer, Karin
1986 Discourse variation and hedging. In
Corpus Linguistics, II, New Studies in the Analysis and Exploitation of Computer Corpora
,
Jan Aarts &
Willem Meijs (eds), 1–18. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bándli, Judit
2009 Az egyet nem értés pragmatikája. PhD dissertation, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana, House, Juliane, & Kasper, Gabriele
1989 The CCSARP coding manual. In Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies,
Shoshana Blum-Kulka,
Juliane House, &
Gabriele Kasper (eds), 273–294. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope, & Levinson, Stephen
1987
Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage
. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan
1996 Towards an anatomy of impoliteness.
Journal of Pragmatics
25: 349–367.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan
2005 Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The Weakest Link.
Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture
1: 35–72.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011
Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence
. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan, Bousfield, Derek, & Wichmann, Anne
2003 Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects.
Journal of Pragmatics
35: 1545–1579.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Du Bois, John W., Cumming, Susanna, Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, & Padino, Danae
(eds) 1992 Discourse transcription. In
Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics
4. Santa Barbara CA: University of California.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fónagy, Iván
1971
Synthèse de l’ironie
. Basel: Karger.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fónagy, Iván, & Magdics, Klára
1967
A magyar beszéd dallama
. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, Herbert Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In
Syntax and Semantics
, 3:
Speech Acts
,
Peter Cole &
Jerry Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York NY: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holtgraves, Tom
1997 Yes, but…: Positive politeness in conversation arguments.
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
16: 222–239.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmes, Janet
1995
Women, Men and Politeness
. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kertész, András, & Rákosi, Csilla
This volume.
Evidence and the argumentation structure of linguistic theories.
Kertész, András, & Rákosi, Csilla
2012
Data and Evidence in Linguistics. A Plausible Argumentation Model
. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
2012 The Effects of Gender and Social Distance on the Expression of Verbal Disagreement Employed by Hungarian Undergraduate Students. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Komlósi, Boglárka
2007 Az iróniakutatás elméleti dilemmái a pragmatikában.
Nyelvtudomány
3–4: 95–128.
Komlósi, Boglárka
2010 Irony in the semantics-pragmatics interface: A reconstructional model.
[URL]
Komlósi, Boglárka
2013 A polarizációs tendencia szerepe az irónia nyilvánvalótételében. A hiperbola és lilotész mint nyomok az irónikus interpretációhoz.
Magyar Nyelv
4: 409–420.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kotthoff, Helga
1993 Disagreement and concession in disputes: On the context sensitivity of preference structures.
Language in Society
22: 193–216.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey
1983
Principles of Pragmatics
. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locher, Miriam
2004
Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication
. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markó, Alexandra
2005 A spontán beszéd néhány szupraszegmentális jellegzetessége: Monologikus és dialogikus szövegek összevetése, valamint a hümmögés vizsgálata. Ph.D. dissertation, ELTE, Budapest, Hungary.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markó, Alexandra
2007 A Special Conversational Device: Humming in Hungarian.
The Phonetician
95: 28–35.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mászlainé Nagy, Judit
2010 A jászapáti Magyar és roma kisiskolások nyelvhasználati stratégiáinak kultúraközi elemzése. PhD dissertation, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Muntigl, Peter & Turnbull, William
1998 Conversational structure and facework in arguing.
Journal of Pragmatics
29(3): 225–256.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Németh T., Enikő
1996
A szóbeli diskurzusok megnyilatkozáspéldányokra tagolása
[Nyelvtudományi értekezések 142]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nauke, Astrid, & Braun, Angelika
2011 The production and perception of irony in short context-free utterances.
ICPhS
7: 1450–1453.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rees-Miller, Janie
1995 Linguistic Features of Disagreement in Face-to-Face Encounters in University Settings. Ph.D. dissertation, Stony Brook, NY: State University of New York.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rees-Miller, Janie
2000 Power, severity, and context in disagreement.
Journal of Pragmatics
32: 1087–1111.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sperber, Dan, & Wilson, Deirdre
2006 Relevance Theory. In
The Handbook of Pragmatic
,
Laurence R. Horn &
Gregory Ward (eds), 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svindt, Veronika
2007 Iróniaértelmezés elméletben és gyakorlatban.
Első Század
, 1: 171–208.
[URL]
Svindt, Veronika
2008 Az irónia szupraszegmentális ismertetőjegyei.
Félúton
4: 1–15.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah
1984
Conversational Style: Analyzing Talk Among Friends
. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toplak Maggie & Katz, Albert N
2000 On the uses of sarcastic irony.
Journal of Pragmatics
32(10): 1467–1488.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Varga, László
1985 Intonation in the Hungarian sentence. In
Approaches to Hungarian
,
István Kenesei (ed.), 205–224. JATE: Szeged, Hungary.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (3)
Cited by 3 other publications
Hamdan, Hady J. & Radwan S. Mahadin
Decock, Sofie & Anneleen Spiessens
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
2017.
Udvariasság/Udvariatlanság és (in)direktség az egyet nem értés beszédaktusában.
Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 4:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.