Syntactic change
Between universal grammar and fuzzy grammar
Two diametrically opposed positions on syntactic change have wide currency in the literature. The first is the classical position of mainstream formal linguistics. In this view, UG-based strategies lead to a dramatically rapid cascade of seemingly unrelated diachronic changes. The second view has been developed primarily in the context of functional linguistics and associated statistical approaches. In this way of looking at things, diachronic change is ‘fuzzy’, in the sense that syntactic categories and constructions undergo a gradual evolution. In this paper I argue that neither position is correct. Syntactic change is discrete and abrupt, as is maintained by most formal syntacticians. However, we must abandon the view that such change can be interpreted in terms of UG-provided parameters or cues.
References
Amritavalli, Rita
2004 Experiencer datives in Kannada. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 60],
Peri Bhaskararao &
Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Carl Lee
1991 The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar.
Linguistic Inquiry
22: 387–429.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark C
2001
The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar
. New York NY: Basic Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata
2004 Preface. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60],
Peri Bhaskararao &
Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), ix–xii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blevins, James P
To appear.
Periphrasis as syntactic exponence. In
Patterns in Paradigms
,
Farrell Ackerman,
James P. Blevins &
G.S. Stump (eds) Stanford CA CSLI
Boeckx, Cedric
2011 Approaching parameters from below. In
Biolinguistic Approaches to Language Evolution and Variation
,
Anna Maria Di Sciullo &
Cedric Boeckx (eds), 205–221. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borer, Hagit
1984
Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages,
Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Foris.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borsley, Robert D. & Rivero, Maria-Luisa
1994 Clitic auxiliaries and incorporation in Polish.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory
12: 373–422.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borsley, Robert D., Rivero, Maria-Luisa & Stephens, Janig
1996 Long head movement in Breton. In
The Syntax of the Celtic Languages
,
Robert D. Borsley &
Ian Roberts (eds), 53–74. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005
Lexicalization and Language Change
. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1981
Lectures on Government and Binding
. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Churchward, Clerk Maxwell
1953
Tongan Grammar
. London: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999
Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective
. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
2004 Oblique-case subjects in Tsez. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60],
Peri Bhaskararao &
Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 113–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crain, Stephen
2012
The Emergence of Meaning
. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
1995 Autonomy and functionalist linguistics.
Language
71: 490–532.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
2000
Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach
. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David
2001 Gradience and linguistic change. In
Historical Linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver 9–13 August 1999
[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 215],
Laurel Brinton (ed.), 119–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Denison, David
2002 History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2: Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki.
Derbyshire, Desmond C
1985
Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology
. Arlington TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dresher, B. Elan
1999 Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting.
Linguistic Inquiry
30: 27–67.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S
1991 SVO languages and the OV: VO typology.
Journal of Linguistics
27: 443–482.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S
1992 The Greenbergian word order correlations.
Language
68: 81–138.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, Joseph E
1986 Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In
A Festschrift for Sol Saporta
,
Michael Brame,
Heles Contreras &
Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds), 93–131. Seattle WA: Noit Amrofer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ernst, Thomas
1992 The phrase structure of English negation.
Linguistic Review
9: 109–144.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fan, Xianlong
2008 A changing target language: Trends in American English as viewed from the EFL perspective of China.
English Today
96: 34–41.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Franks, Steven
1995
Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax
. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gilligan, Gary Martin
1987 A Cross-linguistic Approach to the Pro-drop Parameter. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible?
Linguistics
37: 1043–1068.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2002
Understanding Morphology
. London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A
1994
A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency
. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hawkins, John A
1995 Argument-predicate structure in grammar and performance: A comparison of English and German. In
Insights in Germanic Linguistics
I,
Irmegard Rauch &
Gerald F. Carr (eds), 127–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hermon, Gabriella
2001 Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In
Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
[Typological Studies in Language 46],
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald,
R.M.W. Dixon &
Masayuki Onishi (eds), 149–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders
2005 Stylistic fronting. In
The Blackwell Companion to Syntax
,
Martin Everaert &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 530–563. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders
2010 Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian.
Theoretical Linguistics
36: 1–48.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995
The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax
. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray
1972
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard S
1994
The Antisymmetry of Syntax
. Cambridge M: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard S
2005
Movement and Silence
. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kim, Jong-Bok
2000
The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-based Approach
. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koopman, Hilda
1984
The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar
. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kortmann, Bernd & König, Ekkehard
1992 Categorial reanalysis: The case of deverbal prepositions.
Linguistics
30: 671–697.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroch, Anthony S
1994 Morphosyntactic variation. In
Papers from the 30th Regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society,
Part 2:
The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory
,
Katharine Beals,
Jeanette Denot,
Robert Knippen,
Lynette Melnar,
Hisami Suzuki &
Erica Zeinfeld (eds), 180–201. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William
1972
Language in the inner city
. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W
1993 Why UG needs a learning theory: Triggering verb movement. In
Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives
,
Charles Jones (ed.), 190–214. London: Longman. Reprinted in
Battye, Adrian &
Roberts, Ian (eds) 1995
Clause Structure and Languages Change,
131–152. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W
1999
The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution
. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W
2006
How New Languages Emerge
. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David W. & Westergaard, Marit
2007 Language acquisition and language change: Interrelationships.
Language and Linguistics Compass
1: 396–415.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J
1998
Language Form and Language Function
. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J
2006 Negation and modularity. In
Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn
[Studies in Language Companion Series 80],
Betty Birner &
Gregory Ward (eds), 247–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Onishi, Masayuki
2001 Non-canonically marked A/S in Bengali. In
Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects
[Typological Studies in Language 46],
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon &
Masayuki Onishi (eds), 113–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pateman, Trevor
1987
Language in Mind and Language in Society
. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Hermann
1880/1920
Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte
. Halle: Niemeyer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Payne, John R
1985 Negation. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description
. Vol. I:
Clause Structure
,
Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pintzuk, Susan
1993 The distribution and syntax of Old English adverbs. Ms, New York University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plank, Frans
2012
Das grammatische Raritätenkabinett
.
[URL]
Rizzi, Luigi
1978 Violations of the wh-island constraint in Italian and the subjacency condition. In
Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics
,
Colette Dubuisson,
David Lightfoot &
Yves Charles Morin (eds), 155–190. Montreal: L'association linguistique de Montreal. Reprinted in Rizzi, Luigi 1982
Issues in Italian Syntax,
49–76 Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian
1993
Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French
. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian
2007
Diachronic Syntax
. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna
2005 Verbal person marking. In
The World Atlas of Language Structures
,
Martin Haspelmath,
Matthew S. Dryer,
David Gil &
Bernard Comrie (eds), 414–417. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sobin, Nicholas
1997 Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses.
Linguistic Inquiry
28: 318–143.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sridhar, Shikaripur N
1976 Dative subjects, rule government, and relational grammar.
Studies in the Linguistic Sciences
6: 130–151.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata, & Bhaskararao, Peri
2004 Non-nominative subjects in Telugu. In
Non-nominative Subjects,
Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61],
Peri Bhaskararao &
Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 161–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
van der Auwera, Johan
1984 Subject and non-subject asymmetries in the relativization of embedded NPs. In
Sentential Complementation
,
Wim De Geest &
Yvan Putseys (eds), 257–269. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit
2009 Many small catastrophes: Gradualism in microparametric perspective. In
Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory
,
Paola Crisma &
Giuseppe Longobardi (eds), 76–90. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Charles D
2004 Universal Grammar, statistics, or both?
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
8: 451–456.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
D. M. Smith, Andrew, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit
Denis, Derek
2017.
The Development ofAnd Stuffin Canadian English: A Longitudinal Study of Apparent Grammaticalization.
Journal of English Linguistics 45:2
► pp. 157 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014.
La réanalyse syntaxique et le conflit formaliste-fonctionnaliste en linguistique.
Langages N° 196:4
► pp. 37 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.