Part of
The Sociolinguistics of Grammar
Edited by Tor A. Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum
[Studies in Language Companion Series 154] 2014
► pp. 3766
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2001Verb types, non-canonically marked arguments, and grammatical relations: A Tariana perspective. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 177–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amritavalli, Rita
2004Experiencer datives in Kannada. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol.1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl Lee
1991The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 387–429.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2001 The Atoms of Language: The Mind's Hidden Rules of Grammar . New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bhaskararao, Peri & Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata
2004Preface. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), ix–xii. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2004The syntax of experiences in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James P.
To appear. Periphrasis as syntactic exponence. In Patterns in Paradigms , Farrell Ackerman, James P. Blevins & G.S. Stump (eds) Stanford CA CSLI
Boeckx, Cedric
2011Approaching parameters from below. In Biolinguistic Approaches to Language Evolution and Variation , Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Cedric Boeckx (eds), 205–221. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages, Vol. 13. Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. & Rivero, Maria-Luisa
1994Clitic auxiliaries and incorporation in Polish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 373–422.Google Scholar
Borsley, Robert D., Rivero, Maria-Luisa & Stephens, Janig
1996Long head movement in Breton. In The Syntax of the Celtic Languages , Robert D. Borsley & Ian Roberts (eds), 53–74. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J., & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Churchward, Clerk Maxwell
1953 Tongan Grammar . London: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
2004Oblique-case subjects in Tsez. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 113–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen
2012 The Emergence of Meaning . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
1995Autonomy and functionalist linguistics. Language 71: 490–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Explaining Language Change: An Evolutionary Approach . London: Longman.Google Scholar
Denison, David
2001Gradience and linguistic change. In Historical Linguistics 1999: Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver 9–13 August 1999 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 215], Laurel Brinton (ed.), 119–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2: Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki.
Derbyshire, Desmond C.
1985 Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology . Arlington TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan
1999Charting the learning path: Cues to parameter setting. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 27–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
1991SVO languages and the OV: VO typology. Journal of Linguistics 27: 443–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68: 81–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1986Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In A Festschrift for Sol Saporta , Michael Brame, Heles Contreras & Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds), 93–131. Seattle WA: Noit Amrofer.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas
1992The phrase structure of English negation. Linguistic Review 9: 109–144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fan, Xianlong
2008A changing target language: Trends in American English as viewed from the EFL perspective of China. English Today 96: 34–41.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
1995 Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Gary Martin
1987A Cross-linguistic Approach to the Pro-drop Parameter. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1999Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37: 1043–1068. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46 Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Understanding Morphology . London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John A.
1994 A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1995Argument-predicate structure in grammar and performance: A comparison of English and German. In Insights in Germanic Linguistics I, Irmegard Rauch & Gerald F. Carr (eds), 127–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hermon, Gabriella
2001Non-canonically marked A/S in Imbabura Quechua. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 149–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2005Stylistic fronting. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 530–563. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2010Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995 The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax . Cambridge M: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005 Movement and Silence . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok
2000 The Grammar of Negation: A Constraint-based Approach . Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda
1984 The Syntax of Verbs: From Verb Movement Rules in the Kru Languages to Universal Grammar . Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & König, Ekkehard
1992Categorial reanalysis: The case of deverbal prepositions. Linguistics 30: 671–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1994Morphosyntactic variation. In Papers from the 30th Regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory , Katharine Beals, Jeanette Denot, Robert Knippen, Lynette Melnar, Hisami Suzuki & Erica Zeinfeld (eds), 180–201. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1972 Language in the inner city . Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1982Building on empirical foundations. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics , Winfred Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 17–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David W.
1993Why UG needs a learning theory: Triggering verb movement. In Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives , Charles Jones (ed.), 190–214. London: Longman. Reprinted in Battye, Adrian & Roberts, Ian (eds) 1995  Clause Structure and Languages Change, 131–152. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1999 The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2006 How New Languages Emerge . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. & Westergaard, Marit
2007Language acquisition and language change: Interrelationships. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 396–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mistry, P.J.
2004Subjecthood of non-nominatives in Gujarati. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998 Language Form and Language Function . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006Negation and modularity. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 247–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Onishi, Masayuki
2001Non-canonically marked A/S in Bengali. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, R.M.W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 113–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Trevor
1987 Language in Mind and Language in Society . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1880/1920 Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte . Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Payne, John R.
1985Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description . Vol. I: Clause Structure , Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1993The distribution and syntax of Old English adverbs. Ms, New York University.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
2012 Das grammatische Raritätenkabinett . [URL]
Rizzi, Luigi
1978Violations of the wh-island constraint in Italian and the subjacency condition. In Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics , Colette Dubuisson, David Lightfoot & Yves Charles Morin (eds), 155–190. Montreal: L'association linguistique de Montreal. Reprinted in Rizzi, Luigi 1982  Issues in Italian Syntax, 49–76 Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993 Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French . Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2007 Diachronic Syntax . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rosenbach, Anette
2010How synchronic gradience makes sense in the light of language change (and vice-versa). In Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 129–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2005Verbal person marking. In The World Atlas of Language Structures , Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 414–417. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Smith, K. Aaron
2001The role of frequency in the specialization of the English anterior. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan L. Bybee & Paul Hopper (eds), 361–382. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas
1997Agreement, default rules, and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 318–143.Google Scholar
Sridhar, Shikaripur N.
1976Dative subjects, rule government, and relational grammar. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 6: 130–151.Google Scholar
Subbarao, Karumuri Venkata, & Bhaskararao, Peri
2004Non-nominative subjects in Telugu. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 161–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2010Gradience, gradualness, and grammaticalization: How do they interesct? In Gradience, Gradualness, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
1984Subject and non-subject asymmetries in the relativization of embedded NPs. In Sentential Complementation , Wim De Geest & Yvan Putseys (eds), 257–269. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2009Many small catastrophes: Gradualism in microparametric perspective. In Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory , Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds), 76–90. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, Charles D.
2004Universal Grammar, statistics, or both? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 451–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

D. M. Smith, Andrew, Graeme Trousdale & Richard Waltereit
2015. Introduction. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Denis, Derek
2017. The Development ofAnd Stuffin Canadian English: A Longitudinal Study of Apparent Grammaticalization. Journal of English Linguistics 45:2  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
2014. La réanalyse syntaxique et le conflit formaliste-fonctionnaliste en linguistique. Langages N° 196:4  pp. 37 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.