Cover not available
Part of
The Sociolinguistics of Grammar
Edited by Tor A. Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum
[Studies in Language Companion Series 154] 2014
► pp. 91–116

The social side of syntax in multilingual Oslo

This chapter is concerned with the social side of syntax, which is crucial for examining mechanisms of contact-induced change. The linguistic feature we shed light upon is violations of the syntactic V2 constraint, which has been observed and described as a feature of multiethnic youth varieties in several European urban areas. Drawing on conversational data from Oslo, Norway, we pursue an intuition that multilingualism may be exploited also at a symbolic level in urban areas. L2 usage may have played a role indirectly, by providing input to the feature pool and as a ground for accommodation strategies. The V2 violations may have developed from interactional accommodation to intentional usage imitating in- group prestigious patterns that index coolness, toughness and “foreignness”.
Published online: 16 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.05nis
References (73)
References
Aarsæther, Finn. 2010. The use of multiethnic youth language in Oslo. In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices , Pia Quist & Bente Ailin Svendsen (eds), 111–126. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Aarsæther, Finn & Nistov, Ingvild. 2011. Sociolinguistic portraits of adolescents in multilingual Oslo. Paper presented at the panel Multiethnolects in urban Europe: The role of social categories, International Symposium on Bilingualism 8, University of Oslo, 15–18 June, 2011.Google Scholar
Appel, Rene & Muysken, Pieter. 1987. Language Contact and Bilingualism . London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 1984. Bilingual Conversation [Pragmatics & Beyond V:8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. Introduction: Bilingual conversation revisited. In Code Switching in Conversation. Language, Interaction and Identity , Peter Auer (ed.), 1–24. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 1999. From codeswitching via language mixing to fused lects: Toward a dynamic typology of bilingual speech. The International Journal of Bilingualism 3: 309–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brautaset, Anne. 1996. Inversjon i norsk mellomspråk. En undersøkelse av inversjon i stiler skrevet av innlærere med norsk som andrespråk . Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1978. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bull, Tove. 1995. Language contact leading to language change: The case of Northern Norway. In Linguistic Change and Contact Conditions , Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 15–34. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Språkskifte hos kvinner og menn i ei nordnorsk fjordsamebygd. In Nordnorske dialektar , Ernst Håkon Jahr & Olav Skare (eds.), 185–200. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 2006. Norsk på samisk grunn. Nordand 1: 37–50.Google Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny Fox, Sue, Kerswill, Paul & Torgersen, Eivind. 2008. Ethnicity, friendship networks and social practice as the motor of dialect change: linguistic innovations in London. Sociolinguistica 22: 1–23.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheshire, Jenny, Kerswill, Paul, Fox, Sue & Torgersen, Eivind. 2011. Contact, the feature pool and the speech community: The emergence of Multicultural London English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15: 151–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clyne, Michael. 2000. Lingua Franca and ethnolects in Europe and beyond. Sociolinguistica 14: 83–89.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conzett, Philip, Johansen, Åse Mette & Sollid, Hilde. 2011. Genus og substantivbøying i Nordnorske språkkontaktområder. Nordand 6: 35–71.Google Scholar
Cornips, Léonie & de Rooij, Vincent. 2013. Selfing and othering through categories of race, place, and language among minority youths in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. In Multilngualism and Language Contact in Urban Areas: Acquisition, Development, Teaching, Communication [Hamburg Studies on Linguistic Diversity 1], Peter Siemund, Ingrid Gogolin, Julia Davydova & Monika Schulz (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice . Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12: 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraurud, Kari & Bijvoet, Ellen. 2004. Multietniskt ungdomsspråk och andra varieteter av svenska i flerspråkiga miljöer. In Svenska som andraspråk , Kenneth Hyltenstam & Inger Lindberg (eds), 389–417. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike, Mayr, Katharina, Özçelik, Tiner & Wiese, Heike. 2011. Kiezdeutsch as a multiethnolect. In Ethnic Styles of Speaking in European Metropolitan Areas [Studies in Language Variation 8], Friederike Kern & Margret Selting (eds), 45–73. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike, Cornips, Léonie, Ganauza, Natalia, Nistov, Ingvild & Opsahl, Toril. In press. Beyond V2 – a matter of novel information structural effects? Evidence from Dutch, German, Norwegian and Swedish. In Language, Youth and Identity in the 21st Century , Jacomine Nortier & Bente Ailin Svendsen (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Ganuza, Natalia. 2008. Syntactic Variation in the Swedish of Adolescents in Multilingual Urban Settings. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
. 2010. Subject-verb order variation in the Swedish of young people in multilingual urban areas. In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices , Pia Quist & Bente Ailin Svendsen (eds), 31–48. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982, Discourse Strategies . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagen, Jon Erik. 1992. Feilinvertering, overinvertering og underinvertering. NOA Norsk som andrespråk 15: 27–38.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Eskil, Hoel, Thomas, Jahr, Ernst Håkon, Rekdal, Olaug & Wiggen, Geirr. 1978. Oslo-mål. Prosjektbeskrivelse og syntaktisk analyse av oslomål med henblikk på sosiale skilnader [TAUS skrift 6]. Hovedrapport, Oslo.
Hårstad, Stian. 2010. Performing ‘dangerousness’ linguistically: The case of ‘bad Norwegian’ on the Streets of Trondheim. In “Love ya hate ya”. The Sociolinguistic Study of Youth Language and Youth Identities , Jens Normann Jørgensen (ed.), 249–265. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Jaspers, Jürgen. 2008. Problematizing ethnolects. Naming linguistic practices in an Antwerp Secondary School. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 85–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi & Hagen, Kristin (eds). 2008. Språk i Oslo. Ny forsking omkring talespråk . Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 2008. Oslospråket i tall. In Språk i Oslo. Ny forskning omkring talespråk , Janne Bondi Johannessen & Kristin Hagen (eds), 235–242. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Johansen, Hilde. 2007. Ja takk, begge deler: En undersøkelse av varisjonsmønstre i anvendelse av invertert ordstilling i norske mellomspråkstekster. MA thesis, University of Bergen.Google Scholar
. 2008. Inversjon i norsk innlærerspråk. En undersøkelse av variasjonsmønstre i skrevne tekster. NOA Norsk som andrespråk 24: 50–71.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, J. Normann. 2003. Introduction: Multilingual behavior in youth groups. Nordlyd 31: 740–745.Google Scholar
Kern, Friederike & Selting, Margret. 2006. Einheitenkonstruktion im Türkendeutschen: Grammatische und prosodische Aspekte. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 25: 239–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2002. ‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: evidence from dialect levelling in urban England. In Language Change: The Interplay of External, Internal and Extra-linguistic Factors , Mari C. Jone & Edith Esch (eds), 81–110. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla.-Britt. 1988. Rinkebysvenskan – en dialekt? In Svenskans beskriving 16. Förhandlingar vid sammankomst för att dryfta frågor rörande svenskans beskrivning , Per Linell et al. (eds), 264–278. Linköping: Universitetet i Linköping.Google Scholar
Kotsinas, Ulla-Britt. 2000. Pidginization, creolization and creolids in Stockholm, Sweden. In Kontakt, variation och forändring – Studier i Stockholmsspråk. Ett urval uppsatsar av Ulla-Britt Kotsinas , Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, Staffan Hellberg & Kristina Svartholm (eds), 160–190. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kramsch, Claire. 2006. From communicative competence to symbolic competence. The Modern Language Journal 90: 249–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lane, Pia. 2007. Språk som identitetsuttrykk: Kodeveksling i et kvenskspråklig samfunn. NOA. Norsk som andrespråk 1: 37–56.Google Scholar
Madsen, Lian Malai. 2008. Senmoderne urbane ungdomssproglige stiltræk og identitetskonstruktion hos tre Taekwondo-kæmpere i København. Nordand 3: 7–30.Google Scholar
. 2011. Late modern youth style in interaction. In Ethnic Styles of speaking in European Metropolitan Areas [Studies in Language Variation 8], Friederike Kern & Margret Selting (eds), 265–290. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. 1997. Über Destandardisierung, Umstandardisierung und Standardisierung in modernen europäischen Standardsprachen.” In Standardisierung und Destandardisierung europäischer Nationalsprachen , Klaus J. Mattheier & Edgar Radtke (eds), 1–9. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nistov, Ingvild. 1991. Mellomspråk og morsmål. Ei longitudinell undersøking av trekk i norske mellomspråkstekstar skrivne av fire tyrkiske elevar. NOA Norsk som andrespråk 13: 1–261.Google Scholar
Nistov, Ingvild & Opsahl, Toril. 2009. ‘Plutselig du vinner fem tusen’. Manglande inversjon i norsken til Oslo-ungdom i fleirspråklege miljø. Paper presented at Nordand 9, Den 9. Konferansen om Nordens sprog som andetsprog, Helsingør, 9–11 June.
NoTa: Norsk talespråkskorpus – Oslodelen (Norwegian Spoken Language Corpus – the Oslo part), Tekstlaboratoriet, ILN, Universitetet i Oslo. <[URL]>
Opsahl, Toril. 2009a. “Egentlig alle kan bidra!” En samling sosiolingvistiske studier av strukturelle trekk ved norsk i multietniske ungdomsmiljøer i Oslo. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
. 2009b. Wolla I swear this is typical for the conversational style of adolescents in multiethic areas in Oslo. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32: 221–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Sosial syntaks? Grammatiske variabler i sosiolingvistisk belysning, med utgangspunkt i Oslo. In Fra holtijaR til holting. Språkhistoriske og språksosiologiske artikler til Arne Torp på 70-årsdagen , Unn Røyneland & Hans-Olav Enger (eds), 273–290. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Opsahl, Toril & Røyneland, Unn. 2009. Osloungdom – Født på solsiden eller i skyggen av standardtalemålet? Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 27: 95–120.Google Scholar
Opsahl, Toril & Nistov, Ingvild. 2010. On some structural aspects of Norwegian spoken among adolescents in multilingual settings in Oslo. In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices , Pia Quist & Bente Ailin Svendsen (eds), 49–63. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Inge Lise. 2009. Standardsprogets tilblivelse og rolle i Danmark. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 27: 159–177.Google Scholar
Quist, Pia. 2000. Ny københavnsk ’multietnolekt’. Om sprogbrug blandt unge i sprogligt og kulturelt heterogene miljøer. Danske Talesprog 1: 143–211.Google Scholar
. 2005. Stilistiske praksisser i storbyens hetereogene skole – en etnografisk og sociolingvistisk undersøgelse af sproglig variation. PhD dissertation, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
. 2008. Sociolinguistic approaches to multiethnolect: Language variety and stylistic practice. International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 43–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quist, Pia & Svendsen, Bente Ailin (eds). 2010. Multilingual Urban Scandinavia. New Linguistic Practices . Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Rampton, Ben. 2010. From multiethnic urban heteroglossia to contemporary urban vernaculars. Working papers in Urban Language and Literacies [Paper 61]. London: King´s College.Google Scholar
Sandberg, Sveinung. 2005. Stereotypiens dilemma: Iscenesettelser av etnisitet på gata. Tidsskrift forUngdomsforskning 5: 27–46.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2001. Linguistic outcomes of language contact. In Handbook of Sociolinguistics , Peter Trudgill, J. Chambers & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 638–668. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Selting, Margret & Kern, Friedrike. 2009. On some syntactic and prosodic structures of Turkish German in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 2496–2514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1985. Language and the culture of gender. In Semiotic Mediation, Elizabeth Mertz & Richard J. Parmentier (eds), 219–259. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sollid, Hilde. 2005. Dialektsyntaks i Nordreisa: Språkdannelse og stabilisering i møtet mellom kvensk og norsk. Dr. art-disputas ved Universitetet i Tromsø, 7. oktober 2003. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 23: 75–113.Google Scholar
Sollid, Hilde & Eide, Kristin Melum. 2007a. Om verbplassering og så-konstruksjonen i tospråkmøter. NOA. Norsk som andrespråk 2: 5–32.Google Scholar
. 2007b. On verb second and the så-construction in two Mainland Scandinavian contact situations. Nordlyd 34: 7–28.Google Scholar
Svendsen, Bente Ailin & Røyneland, Unn. 2008. Multiethnolectal facts and functions in Oslo, Norway. The International Journal of Bilingualism 12: 63–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization , and Genetic Linguistics . Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2001. Language Contact . Edinburgh: EUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Language change and language contact. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 339–346. Oxford: Elsevier.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Social and linguistic factors as predictors of contact-induced change. Journal of Language Contact - THEMA 2: 42–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
UPUS/Oslo: <[URL]> 17 January 2014.
Wiese, Heike. 2009. Grammatical innovations in multiethnic urban Europe: New Linguistic practices among adolescents. Lingua 119: 782–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiese, Heike, Freywald, Ulrike & Mayr, Katharina. 2009. Kiezdeutsch as a Test Case for the Interaction Between Grammar and Information Structure . Working Paper of the SFB 632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure [ISIS 12].
Wiese, Heike. 2011. The role of information structure in linguistic variation: Evidence from a German multiethnolect. In Language Variation - European Perspectives III. Selected Papers from ICLaVE 5, Copenhagen [Studies in Language Variation 7], Frans Gregersen, Jeffrey Parrott & Pia Quist (eds.), 83–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Freywald, Ulrike
2023. Wortstellung im Satz. In Deutsche Sprache der Gegenwart, ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Quist, Pia
2019. Indgruppe-variabilitet blandt flersprogede unge – stil, kontrol og lokal tilknytning. Nordand 14:2 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo
Walkden, George
2017. Language contact and V3 in Germanic varieties new and old. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 20:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.