Cover not available
Part of
The Sociolinguistics of Grammar
Edited by Tor A. Åfarli and Brit Mæhlum
[Studies in Language Companion Series 154] 2014
► pp. 171–190

Norwegian discourse ellipses in the left periphery – interacting structural and semantic restrictions

In Norwegian discourse ellipses, elements in the left edge of the clause are most frequently elided. Yet, a topic drop analysis is argued to be empirically too narrow, since occasionally the whole C-domain is silent. I propose an analysis which combines semantic and structural restrictions: Ellipsis must obey the semantic recoverability condition. On the structural side, the whole C-domain can be unrealized only when all the elements are part of the same Agree-relation. If the constituent in (spec,CP) is not part of this agreement system, e.g. if the object is topicalized, ellipsis of the whole domain is illicit. Ellipsis of only (spec,CP) is possible in any case, given that the semantic identity criteria are fulfilled.

Published online: 16 April 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.154.09nyg
References
Cardinaletti, Anna
1990 Subject/object asymmetries in German null-topic constructions and the status of spec CP. In Grammar in Progress , Joan Mascarò & Marina Nespor (eds), 75–84. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1964  Current Issues in Linguistic Theory . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965  Aspects of the Theory of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstovicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002  On Nature and Language, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion Language? , Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David
2008  Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics, 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K
1974 The Role of Topic and Comment in Linguistic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1984 On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Jouitteau, Mélanie
2004 Gestures as expletives : Multichannel syntax. In WCCF 23 Proceedings , Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds), 104–114. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lobeck, Anne
1995  Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McShane, Marjorie
2005  A Theory of Ellipsis . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001  The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis . Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mörnsjö, Maria
2002 V1 Declaratives in Spoken Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo
1982 Initial material deletion. Glossa 16: 85–111.Google Scholar
Nygård, Mari
2013 Discourse ellipsis in spontaneously spoken Norwegian. Clausal architecture and licensing conditions. Doctoral dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–56. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Progovac, Ljiljana, Paesana, Kate, Casielles, Eugenia & Barton, Ellen
(eds) 2006  The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 93]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Radford, Andrew
2004  Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1981 Pragmatics and linguistics. An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–94.Google Scholar
Richards, Mark D
2007 On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 563–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986 Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17:501–557.
1994 Early null subjects and root null subjects. In Language Acquisition Studies in Generative Grammar [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 8], Teun Hoekstra & Bonnie D. Schwartz (eds), 151–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á
1989 Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, Lund University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. & Maling, Joan 2010 The empty left edge condition. In Exploring Crash-Proof Grammars [Language Faculty and Beyond 3], Michael T. Putnam (ed.), 57–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 267–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar