Cover not available
Part of
Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 137–152

If rendaku isn’t a rule, what in the world is it?

The morphophonemic voicing phenomenon in Japanese known as rendaku is highly irregular, but several factors are believed to make rendaku more or less likely. This paper reviews some experiments intended to test the psychological reality of three such factors: Lyman’s Law, the semantic relationship between the two elements in noun + verb compound nouns, and salient semantic or phonological resemblances between novel compounds and existing compounds. The evidence suggests that each of these factors has at least a detectable effect on responses in experimental situations. Any realistic overall account of rendaku will have to incorporate a significant degree of intractable irregularity, but it will also have to be consistent with the intuition of naïve native speakers that rendaku is predictable.

Published online: 10 June 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.156.11van
References
Hamano, Shoko
2000 Voicing of obstruents in Old Japanese: Evidence from the sound-symbolic stratum. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 9: 207–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Kiyoshi, et al.
(eds) 1986  Ōbunsha waei chūjiten . Tokyo: Ōbunsha.Google Scholar
Ihara, Mutsuko & Murata, Tadao
2006 Some experiments on sequential voicing. On’in Kenkyū/Phonological Studies 9: 17–24.Google Scholar
Jorden, Eleanor & Ito Chaplin, Hamako
1962  Beginning Japanese , Part II. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jorden, Eleanor & Noda, Mari
1988  Japanese: The Spoken Language , Part 2. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto
2012 Lyman’s law is active in loanwords and nonce words: Evidence from naturalness judgment studies. Lingua 122: 1193–1206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kazama, Rikizō
(ed.) 1979  Tsuzuriji gyakujun hairetsu gokōsei ni yoru Daigenkai bunrui goi . Tokyo: Fuzanbō.Google Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko
1976 Rendaku no kai. Sophia Linguistica 2: 1–22.Google Scholar
Kitahara Yasuo
(ed.) 1990  Nihongo gyakubiki jiten . Tokyo: Taishūkan.Google Scholar
Kiyose, Gisaburō N
1985 Heianchō hagyō-shiin p-onron. Onsei no Kenkyū 21: 73–87.Google Scholar
Klafehn, Terry
2003 Emergent Properties of Japanese Verb Inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Hawai‘i.Google Scholar
Kokuritsu Kokugo Kenkyūjo
1962  Gendai zasshi kyūjusshu no yōgo yōji, Vol. 1: Sōki oyobi goihyō . Tokyo: Shūei Shuppan.Google Scholar
Kozman, Tam
1998 The psychological status of syntactic constraints on Rendaku . Japanese/Korean Linguistics 8 , David Silva (ed.), 107–120. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lyman, Benjamin Smith
1894  The Change from Surd to Sonant in Japanese Compounds . Philadelphia PA: Oriental Club of Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel E
1952  Morphophonemics of Standard Colloquial Japanese. Supplement to Language [Language Dissertation No. 47].Google Scholar
Matsumura, Akira
(ed.) 1988  Daijirin . Tokyo: Sanseidō.Google Scholar
Miyake, Takeo
1932 Dakuon-kō. Onsei no Kenkyū 5: 135–90.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Kumiko & Vance, Timothy J
2002  Rendaku in noun + verb-stem compounds: A production task. Paper presented at LP’2002, Urayasu, Chiba.
NHK Hōsō Bunka Kenkyūjo
(ed.) 1998  Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten , new edn. Tokyo: Nippon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar
Ohno, Kazutoshi
2000 The lexical nature of Rendaku in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 9 , Mineharu Nakayama & Charles J. Quinn Jr. (eds), 151–164. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Okumura, Mitsuo
1955 Rendaku. Kokugogaku jiten , Kokugo Gakkai (ed.), 961–962. Tokyo: Tōkyōdō.Google Scholar
Sakurai, Shigeharu
1966 Kyōtsūgo no hatsuon de chūi subeki kotogara. Nihongo hatsuon akusento jiten , Nihon Hōsō Kyōkai (ed.), 31–43. Tokyo: Nihon Hōsō Shuppan Kyōkai.Google Scholar
Seeley, Christopher
1991  A History of Writing in Japan . Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Shinmura, Izuru
(ed.) 1998  Kōjien , 5th edn. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Sugioka, Yoko
1986  Interaction of Derivational Morphology and Syntax . New York NY: Garland. (University of Chicago PhD dissertation, 1984).Google Scholar
2005 Multiple mechanisms underlying morphological productivity. Polymorphous Linguistics: Jim McCawley’s Legacy , Salikoko S. Mufwene, Elaine J. Francis & Rebecca S. Wheeler (eds), 204–223. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Unger, J. Marshall
2004 Alternations of m and b in Early Middle Japanese: The deeper significance of the sound-symbolic stratum. Japanese Language and Literature 38: 323–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vance, Timothy J
1980 The psychological status of a constraint on Japanese consonant alternation. Linguistics 18: 245–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987  An Introduction to Japanese Phonology . Albany NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
1991 A new experimental study of Japanese verb morphology. Journal of Japanese Linguistics 13: 145–166.Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, Kyoko
2011 Accentedness and Rendaku in Japanese deverbal compounds. Gengo Kenkyu 140: 117–134.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Kawahara, Shigeto
2015. Can we use rendaku for phonological argumentation?. Linguistics Vanguard 1:1 ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kawahara, Shigeto & Gakuji Kumagai
2023. Lyman’s Law can count only up to two. Laboratory Phonology 14:1 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2016. Sequential Voicing in Japanese [Studies in Language Companion Series, 176], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.