Article published in:Usage-based Approaches to Japanese Grammar: Towards the understanding of human language
Edited by Kaori Kabata and Tsuyoshi Ono
[Studies in Language Companion Series 156] 2014
► pp. 153–170
The semantic basis of grammatical development
Its implications for modularity, innateness, and the theory of grammar
This chapter reviews semantic bias observed in the acquisition of grammatical categories, and examines its theoretical implications. It first reviews the acquisition of tense-aspect morphology, in particular of English, and proposes a model of grammatical development called the “input-based prototype formation”, taking examples from cross-linguistic data. I will then discuss semantic bias observed in the acquisition of pronominal case in English, conditionals in Japanese and Korean, causative morphology in Japanese, nominative case omission in Japanese and Korean, and relative clause construction in Japanese. Based on the review, I will argue against modularity and the innateness hypothesis, which constitutes the fundamental assumptions espoused by generative grammar, and argue for further analysis of semantic bias in frequency distribution in the input language that children are exposed to.
Published online: 10 June 2014
Akatsuka, Noriko & Clancy, Patricia M.
1993 Conditionality and deontic modality in Japanese and Korean: Evidence from emergence of conditionals. Japanese/ Korean Linguistics , Vol. 2, Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), 177-192. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Andersen, Roger W.
1990 Seminar on the acquisition of tense and aspect . Unpublished lecture, University of California at Los Angeles.
1993 Four operating principles and input distribution as explanations for underdeveloped and mature morphological systems. In Progression and Regression in Language , Kenneth Hyltenstam & Åke Viborg (eds), 309-339. Cambridge: CUP.
Andersen, Roger W. & Shirai, Yasuhiro
1996 Primacy of aspect in first and second language acquisition: The pidgin/creole connection. In Handbook of Second Language Acquisition , William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Antinucci, Francesco & Miller, Ruth
Bates, Elizabeth & MacWhinney, Brian
1989 Functionalism and the competition model. In The Cross-linguistic Study of Sentence Processing , Brian MacWhinney & Elizabeth Bates (eds). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1994 Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Other Children, Other Languages: Issues in Theory of Language Acquisition , Yonata Levy (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1981 Roots of Language . Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.
1999 Creole languages, the Language Bioprogram Hypothesis, and language acquisition. In Handbook of Child Language Acquisition , William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds). San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Bolinger, Dwight & Sears, Donald A.
1981 Aspects of Language , 3rd edn. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
1985 What shapes children's grammars? In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical Issues , Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1986 Agentivity and Control in Early Child Language. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
1996 What influences children's patterning of forms and functions in early child language? In Social Interaction, Social Cognition and Language: Essays in Honor of Susan Ervin-Tripp , Dan Isaac Slobin, Julie Gerhardt, Amy Kyratzis & Jiansheng Guo (Eds). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bybee, Joan L. & McClelland, James L.
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael
Crain, Stephen, & Thornton, Rosalind
1998 Investigations in Universal Grammar: A Guide to Experiments in the Acquisition of Syntax and Semantics . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Crain, Stephen & Wexler, Kenneth
1999 Methodology in the study of language acquisition: A modular approach. In Handbook of Language Acquisition , William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds). New York NY: Academic Press.
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael
2000 The development of relative clauses in spontaneous child speech. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 131-151.
1995 Constructions . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy & Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick
1996 The Origins of Grammar: Evidence from Early Language Comprehension . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
Kuczaj, Stan A.
1976 -ing, -s, and -ed: A Study of the Acquisition of Certain Verb Inflections. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.
2000 A dynamic usage-based model. In Usage-Based Models of Language , Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 1-63. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Lee, Hyeonjin & Wexler, Kenneth
2001 Nominative case omission and unaccusatives in Korean acquisition. In Selected Papers from the Twelfth International Conference on Korean Linguistics, Hee-Don Ahn & Nam-Kil Kim (eds), 263-279. Seoul: Kyungjin Munhwasa.
1990 Tense and aspect in Italian: A bias in the distribution of verbal inherent semantics and verbal morphology. Unpublished paper, Applied Linguistics, University of California, Los Angeles.
Li, Ping & Bowerman, Melissa
Li, Ping & Shirai, Yasuhiro
Lieven, Elena V.M.
Maratsos, Michael P. & Chalkley, Mary Anne
1980 The internal language of children's syntax: The ontogenesis and representation of syntactic categories. In Children's Language , Vol. 2, Keith E. Nelson (ed.), 127-214. New York NY: Gardner Press
Mayes, Patricia & Ono, Tsuyoshi
1993 The acquisition of the Japanese subject marker ga and its theoretical implications. In Japanese/Korean Linguistics , Vol. 2, Patricia M. Clancy (ed.), 239-247 Stanford CA: CSLI.
Miyamoto, Edson T., Wexler, Ken, Aikawa, Takako & Miyagawa, Shigeru
1999 Case-dropping and unaccusatives in Japanese acquisition. In Proceedings of the 23rd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Annabel Greenhill, Heather Littlefield & Cheryl Tano (eds), 443-452. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Morikawa, H. & Ono, S.
1997 Children's understanding of causatives in Japanese: A cross-sectional study. Paper presented at the SRCD Biennial Meeting, Washington DC, April 2.
1983 Grammatical Theory: Its Limits and Possibilities . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Newport, Elissa, Gleitman, Henry & Gleitman, Lila
1977 “Mother, I'd rather do it myself”: Some effects and non-effects of maternal speech style. In Talking to children: Language Input and Acquisition , Catherine E. Snow & Charles A. Ferguson (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
1985 Variation and error: A sociolinguistic approach to language acquisition. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1: The Data . Daniel Isaac Slobin (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ozeki, Hiromi & Shirai, Yasuhiro
1999 Words and Rules . New York NY: Harper Collins.
Pawley, Andrew & Syder, Frances
1983 Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In Language and communication , Jack C. Richards & Richard Schmidt (eds). London: Longman.
Rowland, Caroline F., Pine, Julian M., Lieven, Elena V.M. & Theakston, Anna L.
Schütze, Carson T.
1991 Primacy of Aspect in Language Acquisition: Simplified Input and Prototype. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
1993 Inherent aspect and the acquisition of tense/aspect morphology in Japanese. In Argument Structure: Its Syntax and Acquisition , Heizo Nakajima & Yukio Otsu (ed.).Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
Shirai, Yasuhiro & Andersen, Roger W.
Shirai, Yasuhiro, Miyata, Susanne, Naka, Norio, & Sakazaki, Yoshiko
2000 The acquisition of causative morphology: Why does it correlate with the imperative? In Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual Child Language Research Forum, Eve V. Clark (ed.). Stanford CA: CSLI.
2001 The acquisition of causative morphology in Japanese: A prototype account. In Issues in East Asian Language Acquisition , Mineharu Nakayama (ed.), 183-203. Tokyo: Kurosio.
Slobin, Dan Isaac
1985 Crosslinguistic evidence for the Language-Making Capacity. In The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition. Vol. 2: Theoretical issues , Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
1997-a Why are grammaticizable notions special? A reanalysis and a challenge to learning theory. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development , Melissa Bowerman Stephen Levinson (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
1997-b The origins of grammaticizable notions: Beyond the individual mind. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 5: Expanding the Contexts , Dan Isaac Slobin (ed.). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Slobin, Dan Isaac & Aksu, Ayha A.
1980 Acquisition of Turkish. Ms. Cited in Bickerton 1981.
Theakston, Anna L., Lieven, Elena V.M., Pine, Julian M. & Rowland, Caroline F.
2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
1999 Input and language acquisition. In Handbook of Child Language Acquisition , William C. Ritchie & Tej K. Bhatia (eds), 497-530. New York NY: Academic Press.