Part of
Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English
Edited by Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 159] 2014
► pp. 1138
References (47)
References
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Breindl, Eva. 2008. Die Brigitte nun kann der Hans nicht ausstehen. Gebundene Topiks im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 36: 27–49.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel. 2009. Towards a typology of focus realization. In Information Structure, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 177–205. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, George. [1776] 1963. The Philosophy of Rhetoric, Lloyd F. Bitzer (ed.). Carbondale IL: Southern Illinois University Press. First published London: Printed for W. Strahan and T. Cadell and W. Creech at Edinburgh 1776.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles Li (ed.), 127–155. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1998. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 4: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2005. Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clause. Linguistics 43(3): 449–470. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversations [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 9]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garner, Bryan A. 2000. The Oxford Dictionary of American Usage and Style. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Garner’s Modern American Usage. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1969. Studies in Adverbial Usage. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6): 3603–3623. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2010. Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Horová, Eva. 1976. On position and function of English local and temporal adverbials. Brno Studies in English 12: 93–123.Google Scholar
Howard, Godfrey. 1994. The Good English Guide. English Usage in the 1990s. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Sven. 1964. Adverbial Positions in English. Stockholm: Studentbok.Google Scholar
Jitschin, Peter. 2012. Adverbial Connectors and Information Structure. Schriftliche Hausarbeit für die Erste Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien, Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt. Ms.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information Structure, Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds). Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 6: 13–55. <[URL]> (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Lahiri, Aditi & Plank, Frans. 2010. Phonological phrasing in Germanic: The judgment of history, confirmed through experiment. Transactions of the Philological Society 108: 370–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 71]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 2008. Information structure and grammaticalization. In Theoretical and Empirical Issues in Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 77], Elena Seoane & María José López-Couso (eds), 207–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and Rhetoric – Adverbial Connectors in the History of English [Topics in English Linguistics 64]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A focus on adverbial connectors: Connecting, partitioning, and focusing attention in the history of English. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou. 2009. The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13: 97–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 21–46. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage. 1998. Springfield MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Meurman-Solin, Anneli. 2012. The connectives and, for, but, and only as clause and discourse type indicators in 16th- and 17th-century epistolary prose. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 164–196. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax, 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Janel L. 1984. The Native Tongue and the Word. Developments in English Prose Style 1380–1580. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Onea, Edgar & Anna Volodina. 2009. Der Schein trügt nämlich . Linguistische Berichte 219: 291–321.Google Scholar
Onea, Edgar & von Heusinger, Klaus. 2009. Topikwechsel im Diskurs. Handout SPSW, Stuttgart [URL] (5 July 2013).
Pasch, Renate, Brauße, Ursula, Breindl, Eva & Waßner, Ulrich Hermann. 2003. Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren . Linguistische Grundlagen der Beschreibung und syntaktische Merkmale der deutschen Satzverknüpfer (Konjunktionen, Satzadverbien und Partikeln). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pérez-Guerra, Javier. 2005. Word order after the loss of verb-second constraint or the importance of early modern English in the fixation of syntactic and informative (un-)markedness. English Studies 86: 342–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, Charles. 1977. An Old English Grammar [Methuen’s Old English Library]. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1985. Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English: A Synchronic and Diachronic Investigation [Tromsø-studier i Språkvitenskap 10]. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and Emphasis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1985. Grammar and written discourse: Initial vs. final purpose clauses in English. Text 5(1): 55–84.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich, Meier, Gerhard E.H., Schäfer, Klaus & Lechler, Shirley B. 1984. A Grammar of Present-day English. Stuttgart: Klett.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich. 1988. Syntax der englischen Adverbialien. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Bettelou Los. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 224–248. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans, Milicev, Tanja & Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. The balance between syntax and discourse in Old English. In English Historical Linguistics 2006. Selected Papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14) , Bergamo, 21–25 August 2006, Vol. I:Syntax and Morphology[Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 295], Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds), 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992. Discourse Functions of Adverbial Placement in English. Clause-initial Adverbials of Time and Place in Narratives and Procedural Place Descriptions. Åbo: Åbo Akademis förlag.Google Scholar
Wårvik, Brita. 2011. Connective or ‘disconnective’ discourse marker? Old English þa, multifunctionality and narrative structuring. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. [URL] (5 July 2013).Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Pinson, Mathilde
2023. Decompositionalization and Partial Recompositionalization: The Emergence of by the Same Token as a Polyfunctional Discourse Marker. Journal of English Linguistics 51:3  pp. 236 ff. DOI logo
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2023. “But I Hate Him Just the Same”: On the Rise of Concessive Markers with Same. Journal of English Linguistics 51:4  pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Pittner, Karin
2015. Between inflection and derivation. In Adverbs [Studies in Language Companion Series, 170],  pp. 133 ff. DOI logo
van de Pol, Nikki & Peter Petré
2015. Why is there a Present-Day English absolute?. Studies in Language 39:1  pp. 199 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.