Vowels before /r/ in the history of English
In the past few centuries vowels before historic /r/ have gone through many changes in different varieties of English, including non-rhotic forms which lost syllable-final /r/ in the eighteenth or early nineteenth centuries. These changes can be grouped into two major types. The first is characterized by the collapse of a front/back distinction for short-mid vowels (the NURSE-TERM merger) which holds for all supraregional forms of English, bar those in Scotland where, in addition, the vowel in BIRD may retain a front, high quality. The loss of distinctiveness for these vowels is attributed to the rhotacisation of the entire syllable nucleus which is something which must have happened before the loss of /r/ which led to non-rhotic varieties. The second type of change involves the merger of two formerly distinct pre-rhotic vowels to one, as in the HORSE-HOARSE and the POOR-POUR mergers. There are further subtypes to the merger development, e.g. merger through diphthong smoothing as in the TOWER-TYRE merger. Finally, there are pre-rhotic mergers which involve more than two elements, e.g. the MARY-MERRY-MARRY which depend on the loss of both qualitative and quantitative distinctions.
References
Bauer, Laurie & Paul, Warren
2008 New Zealand English: Phonology. In
Varieties of English 3: The Pacific and Australia,
Kate Burridge &
Bernd Kortmann (eds), 40–63. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Beal, Joan
2008 English dialects in the North of England: Phonology. In
Varieties of English, 1: The British Isles,
Bernd Kortmann &
Clive Upton (eds), 122–144. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bowerman, Sean
2008 White South African English: Phonology. In
Varieties of English: Africa, South and Southeast Asia,
Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 164–176. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cruttenden, Alan
2008 Gimson’s Pronunciation of English, 7th edn. London: Arnold.
Dobson, Eric John
1968 English Pronunciation 1500–1700. Vol.1 – Survey of the Sources, Vol. 2: Phonology, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.
Erickson, Blaine
2002 On the development of English r. In
Studies in the History of the English Language. A Millennial Perspective,
Donka Minkova &
Robert Stockwell (eds), 183–206. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerry
2000 Another chapter in the story of /r/: ‘Labiodental’ variants in British English.
Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(1): 30–59.
Gordon, Elizabeth & Maclagan, Margaret
2008 Regional and social differences in New Zealand: Phonology. In
Varieties of English, 3: The Pacific and Australia,
Kate Burrdige &
Bernd Kortmann (eds), 64–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gordon, Matthew
2008 New York, Philadelphia and other northern cities: Phonology. In
Varieties of English 2: The Americas and the Caribbean,
Edgar W. Schneider (eds), 67–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hay, Jennifer & Clendon, Alhana
2012 (Non-)rhoticity: Lessons from New Zealand English. In
The Oxford Handbook of the History of English,
Terttu Nevalainen &
Elizabeth Traugott (eds), 761–772. Oxford: OUP.
Hickey, Raymond
1985 The interrelationship of epenthesis and syncope. Evidence from Irish and Dutch.
Lingua 65: 229–249.
Hickey, Raymond
2007 Irish English. Its History and Present-day Forms. Cambridge: CUP.
Hickey, Raymond
2012 Internally and externally motivated language change. In
The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics,
Juan Manuel Hernández-Compoy &
Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), 401–421. Malden MA: Wiley- Blackwell.
Jones, Charles
1989 A History of English Phonology. London: Longman.
Jones, Daniel
1976[1919] Outline of English Phonetics, 9nth edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Kretzschmar, William A., Jr
2008 Standard American English pronunciation. In
Varieties of English, 2: The Americas and the Caribbean,
Edgar W. Schneider (eds), 37–51. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kurath, Hans
1971 Mourning and Morning. A Various Language. Perspectives on American Dialects,
Juanita V. Williamson &
Virginia M. Burke (eds), 417–423.New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lass, Roger
2006 Phonology and morphology. In
A History of the English Language,
Richard Hogg &
David Denison (eds), 43–108. Cambridge: CUP.
McMahon, April
2000 Lexicology Phonology and the History of English. Cambridge: CUP.
Milroy, James
1992 Linguistic Variation and Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Milroy, James & Harris, John
Nares, Robert
1784[1968] Elements of Orthoepy, reprint. Menston: Scolar Press.
Smith, Jeremy
2007 Sound Change and the History of English. Oxford: OUP.
Stuart-Smith, Jane
2008 Scottish-English phonology. In
Varieties of English, 1: The British Isles,
Bernd Kortmann &
Clive Upton (eds), 48–70. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Thomas, Erik
2008 Rural Southern white accents. In
Varieties of English, 2: The Americas and the Caribbean,
Edgar W. Schneider (ed.), 87–114. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Trudgill, Peter
2008 The dialects of English Anglia: Phonology. In
Varieties of English, 1: The British Isles,
Bernd Kortmann &
Clive Upton (eds), 178–222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
van Rooy, Bertus
2008 Black South African English: Phonology. In
Varieties of English, 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia,
Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 177–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Watson, Kevin
2006 Phonological resistance and innovation in the North-West of England.
English Today 22(2): 55–61.
Wilson, Sheila
2008 St. Helena English: Phonology. In
Varieties of English, Vol. 4: Africa, South and Southeast Asia,
Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 223–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Upton, Clive
2008 Received pronunciation. In
Varieties of English, 1: The British Isles,
Bernd Kortmann &
Clive Upton (eds), 237–252. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Walker, John
1791 A Critical Pronouncing Dictionary and Expositor of the English Language, reprint. Menston: Scolar Press.
Wells, John C
1982 Accents of English, 3 Vols. Cambridge: CUP.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Hartmann, Frederik & Chiara Riegger
[no author supplied]
2023.
References. In
Sounds of English Worldwide,
► pp. 354 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.