Cover not available
Part of
Contact, Variation, and Change in the History of English
Edited by Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt and Daniel Schreier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 159] 2014
► pp. 187–212

Letters of Artisans and the Labouring Poor (England, c. 1750–1835)

Approaching linguistic diversity in Late Modern English

ORCID logo
| University of Lausanne
Histories of linguistic variability and language standardization in Late Modern England have predominantly focused on the well-educated layers of society. This paper aims at providing a more complete overview of language use during that period by focusing on the lower social ranks. The discussion will be based on the corpus Letters of Artisans and the Labouring Poor (LALP), which contains more than 2,000 letters of application for poor relief from the period c.1750−1835. The first part of the paper describes the corpus in some detail. The second part discusses new research questions that the lower-class material raises; this will be illustrated by two case studies. In the first study, the material will be viewed from the point of view of spelling acquisition and fossilization. The second case study focuses on providing diachronic time depth to some of the current issues discussed in the sociolinguistics of globalization (Blommaert 2010), such as mobility and developing literacies.
Published online: 11 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.159.10lai
References (36)
References
Auer, Anita. 2014. Stylistic variation. In Letter Writing and Language Change, Anita Auer, Daniel Schreier & Richard J. Watts (eds). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita & Fairman, Tony. 2013. Letters of artisans and the labouring poor (England, c. 1750–1835). In New Methods in Historical Corpus Linguistics [Corpus Linguistics and Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Language 3], Paul Bennett, Martin Durrell, Silke Scheible & Richard J. Whitt (eds), 77–91. Narr: Tübingen.Google Scholar
Auer, Anita, Mikko Laitinen, Moragh Gordon & Tony Fairman. Forthcoming. Challenges, solutions, and prospects in creating an electronic corpus of letters of artisans and the labouring poor (England, c. 1750–1835). In Recent Advances in Corpus Linguistics: Developing and Exploiting Corpora. [Series Language and Computers: Studies in Practical Linguistics], Kristin Davidse, Caroline Gentens, Ditte Kimps & Lieven Vandelanotte (eds).Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Barton, David. 2007. Literacy. An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barton, David, & Hall, Nigel. 2000. Introduction. In Letter Writing as a Social Practice [Studies in Written Language and Literacy 9], David Barton & Nigel Hall (eds), 1–15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2010. The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, Jan & Rampton, Ben. 2011. Language and superdiversity. Diversities 13(2). [URL] (21 May 2012).Google Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda. 2012. ʻIt is with a trembling hand I beg to intrude this letterʼ: Politeness in the Pauper Letters of 18th Century England. In English Historical Linguistics 2008: Selected Papers from the Fifteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 15) , Munich, 24−30 August 2008, Vol. II: Words, Texts and Genres, Hans Sauer & Gaby Waxenberger (eds), 237–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dossena, Marina. 2007. ʻAs this leaves me at present’ − Formulaic usage, politiness, and social proximity in Nineteenth-century Scottish emigrants’ letters. In Germanic Language Histories 'from Below' (1700−2000), Stephan Elspaβ, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 13–29. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ehri, Linnea C. & Robers, Theresa. 2006. The roots of learning to read and write: Acquisition of letters and phonemic awareness. In Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Vol. 2, David K. Dickinson & Susan B. Neuman (eds), 113–131. New York NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Elspaß, Stephan. 2012. Between linguistic creativity and formulaic restriction. In Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 218], Marina Dossena & Gabriella del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 45–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elspaß, Stefan. 2007. A twofold view ‘from below’: New perspectives on language histories and language historiographies. In Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’ (1700−2000), Stefan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 3−10. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairman, Tony. 2007. ‘Lower-order’ letters, schooling and the English language, 1795 to 1834. In Germanic Language Histories ‘from Below’, Stephan Elspaß, Nils Langer, Joachim Scharloth & Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 63–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2012. Letters in mechanically-schooled language. In Letter Writing in Late Modern Europe[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 218], Marina Dossena & Gabriella Del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 205–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garton, Alison, & Pratt, Chris. 1998. Learning to Be Literate . The Development of Spoken and Written Language. Oxford MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hitchcock, Tim, King, Peter & Sharpe, Pamela. 1997. Introduction. In Chronicling Poverty – The Voices and Strategies of the English Poor, 1640−1840, Tim Hitchcock, Peter King & Pamela Sharpe (eds), 1–18. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Laitinen, Lea & Nordlund, Taru. 2012. Performing a writer's identity in interaction. In Letter-writing in Early Modern Europe [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 218], Marina Dossena & Gabriella del Lungo Camiciotti (eds), 65–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lawson, John & Silver, Harold. 1973. A Social History of Education in England. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Letters of Artisans and the Labouring Poor, c. 1750−1834 (LALP). Under construction. Compiled by Tony Fairman, Maidstone, and converted into a corpus by Anita Auer, Moragh Gordon, Utrecht University, and Mikko Laitinen, Linnaeus University.
More, Charles. 2000. Understanding the Industrial Revolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nelson, Mike. 2010. Building a writing corpus: What are the basics? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Anne O’Keefe & Michael McCarthy (eds), 53–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rutten, Gijsbert & van der Wal, Marijke. 2012. Functions of epistolary formulae in Dutch letters from the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 13(2): 173–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, Michael. 1995. Education, Economic Change and Society in England 1780–1870, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Sharpe, Pamela. 1997. The bowels of compation. In Chronicling Poverty. The Voices and Strategies of the English Poor, 1640−1840, Tim Hitchcock, Peter King & Pamela Sharpe (eds), 87–108. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sokoll, Thomas (ed.). 2001. Essex Pauper Letters 1731–1837. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, Liliane, & Béchennec, Danielle. 2004. Variability and invariance in learning alphabetic orthographies. From linguistic to psycholinguistic processing. Written Language and Literacy 7(1): 9–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Street, Brian V. (ed). 1993. Cross-cultural Approaches to Literacy. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. Changing conventions of writing: The dynamics of genres, text types, and text traditions. European Journal of English Studies 5(2): 139–150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Discourse and genre dynamics in Early Modern English medical writing. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds.), 29–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vandenbussche, Wim & Elspaß, Stephan (eds). 2007. Lower Class Language Use in the 19th Century. Special issue ofMultilingua26.Google Scholar
Watts, Richard, & Trudgill, Peter (eds). 2002. Alternative Histories of English. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whyte, Ian. 2004. Migration and settlement. In A Companion to Nineteenth-century Britain, Chris Williams (ed.), 273–286. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Williams, Chris (ed.). 2004. A Companion to Nineteenth-century Britain. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Włodarczyk, Matylda. 2013. 1820 settler petitions in the Cape Colony: Genre dynamics and materiality. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 14(1): 45–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wrigley, Edward Anthony & Schofield, Roger S. 1981. The Population History of England, 1541–1971: A Reconstruction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gardner, Anne-Christine
2023. English Pauper Letters in the Eighteenth Century and Beyond. Linguistica 63:1-2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Voeste, Anja
2018. The self as a source. A peasant farmer’s letters from prison (1848–1852). Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 4:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.