Article published in:
The Diachrony of Negation
Edited by Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen and Jacqueline Visconti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 160] 2014
► pp. 185–212

The grammaticalization of negative indefinites

The case of the temporal/aspectual n-words plus and mais in Medieval French

| The University of Manchester
This chapter traces the diachronic evolution in Medieval French of two temporal/aspectual n-words of adverbial origin, the markers mais (< Lat. MAGIS ‘more, to a greater degree’) and plus (< Lat. PLUS ‘more’), equivalent to English no more/no longer, anymore/any longer, with a view to addressing two theoretical issues: (i) whether the evolution of indefinites is unidirectional, as claimed by Haspelmath (1997), or rather subject to a “random diachronic walk”, as suggested by Jäger (2010); (ii) whether the evolution of the French n-words can be described in terms of a general cyclical development parallel to that of the standard clause negator (commonly known as Jespersen’s Cycle). It is argued that, like those reported in Hansen (2012), the results of this study support the random walk hypothesis, and weakens the case for a quantifier cycle in French. Moreover, the results of the two studies suggest that functional categories, or paradigms, are pragmatic, rather than linguistic, entities.
Published online: 24 October 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.160.07mos
References

Databases

BFM = Base de français médiéval
<http://​txm​.bfm​-corpus​.org​/bfm​/>
DMF = Dictionnaire du moyen français
<http://​www​.atilf​.fr​/dmf​/>
Buridant, Claude
2000 Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: SEDES.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2002 Direct and parasitic polarity item licensing. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 5: 35-66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Déprez, Viviane
2011 Atoms of negation: An outside-in micro-parametric approach to negative concord. In The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds), 221-272. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Déprez, Viviane & Martineau, France
2004 Micro-parametric variation and negative concord. In Contemporary Approaches to Romance Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 258], Julie Auger, Clancy Clements & Barbara Vance (eds), 139-158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ducrot, Oswald & Vogt, Carlos
1979 De magis à mais: Une hypothèse sémantique. Revue de Linguistique Romane 43(171-172): 317-341.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien
1946 Le plus quantitatif et le plus temporel. In Etudes romanes dédiées à Mario Roques par ses amis, collègues et anciens élèves de France, 131-147. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
1965 Petite syntaxe de l’ancien français, 3rd edn. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Guerzoni, Elena & Sharvit, Yael
2007 A question of strength: On NPIs in interrogative clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 361-391. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2008 Particles at the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface: Synchronic and Diachronic Issues. A Study with Special Reference to the French Phasal Adverbs [Current Research in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface 19]. Oxford:Elsevier & Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2009 The grammaticalization of negative reinforcers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics [Studies in Pragmatics 7], Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 227-251. Bingley:Emerald & Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Discussion of Viviane Déprez: “Atoms of negation. An outside-in micro-parametric approach to negative concord.” In The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds), 273-283. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2012 On the evolution of temporal n-words in Medieval French. Language Sciences 34(1): 76-91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Cyclicity in semantic/pragmatic change: Old French ja between Latin IAM and Modern French déjà . In Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to Romance [Oxford Studies in Historical Linguistics 9], Chiara Ghezzi & Piera Molinelli (eds), 139-165. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1997 Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83-101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoeksema, Jack
2000 Negative polarity items: Triggering, scope, and c-command. In Negation and Polarity. Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives, Laurence Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds), 115-146. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007 Parasitic licensing of negative polarity items. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10: 163-182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Polarity items in Strawsonian contexts - A comparison. In Beyond Any and Ever. New Explorations in Negative Polarity Sensitivity [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 262], Eva Csipak, Regine Eckardt, Mingya Liu & Manfred Sailer (eds),47-78. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard P
2011 Grammar change in Anglo-Norman and Continental French: The replacement of non-affirmative indefinite nul by aucun . Diachronica 28(4): 441-467. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010  Anything is nothing is something. On the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 787-822. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917 Negation in English and Other Languages [Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Historisk-Filologiske Meddelelser I, 5]. Copenhagen: Høstog Søn.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1992 The present perfect puzzle. Language 68(3): 525-552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William A
1993 Negation, indefinites, and the Jespersen Cycle. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society.General Session and Parasession on Semantic Typology and Semantic Universals , Joshua S. Guenter, Barbara A. Kaiser & Cheryl C. Zoll (eds), 437-446. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Klima, Edward S
1964 Negation in English. In Jerry A. Fodor & Jerrold A. Katz, eds. The Structure of Language. Readings in the Philosophy of Language. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 246-323.Google Scholar
Laka Muzarga, Miren Itziar
1990 Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985 Grammaticalization. Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e stile XX(3): 303-318.Google Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
1997 La langue française aux XIVe et XVe siècle. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
Martin, Robert
1966 Le mot rien et ses concurrents en français (du XIVe siècle à l’époque contemporaine). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Martineau, France
1994 Movement of negative adverbs in French infinitival clauses. Journal of French Language Studies 4: 55-73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moignet, Gérard
1976 Grammaire de l’ancien français. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Muller, Claude
1991 La négation en français. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Offord, Malcolm
1976 Negation in “Berinus”: A contribution to the study of negation in fourteenth century French. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 92(3-4): 313-385. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John
1985 Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 1, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197-242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rowlett, Paul
1998 Sentential Negation in French. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte
2010 Expression and Interpretation of Negation. An OT Typology. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, Knud
1974 Précis historique de grammaire française. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
1998 Phasal adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera & Donall P.Ó Baoill (eds), 25-145. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan & Van Alsenoy, Lauren
2011 Indefinite pronouns, synchrony and diachrony: Comments on Willis. In The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds), 325-345. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Willis, David
2011 Negative polarity and the quantifier cycle: Comparative diachronic perspectives from European languages. In The Evolution of Negation. Beyond the Jespersen Cycle, Pierre Larrivée & Richard P. Ingham (eds), 282-323. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher & Breitbarth, Anne
2013 Comparing diachronies of negation. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, Vol. I: Case Studies, David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breitbarth (eds), 1-50. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, Hedde
2008 Negative concord in syntactic agreement. Ms, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

GIBSON, HANNAH
2021.  Anne Breitbarth, Christopher Lucas & David Willis, The history of negation in the languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, vol. II: Patterns and processes (Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics 40). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. xiv + 292.. Journal of Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 675 ff. Crossref logo
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard
2021. Cyclic changes to the negative coordinating conjunction from Latin to Modern French. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 223 ff. Crossref logo
van der Auwera, Johan
2022. Nominal and pronominal negative concord, through the lens of Belizean and Jamaican Creole. Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 505 ff. Crossref logo
van der Auwera, Johan & Lauren Van Alsenoy
2016. On the typology of negative concord. Studies in Language 40:3 ► pp. 473 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.