Cover not available
Part of
Paradigm Change: In the Transeurasian languages and beyond
Edited by Martine Robbeets and Walter Bisang
[Studies in Language Companion Series 161] 2014
► pp. 61–88

Chapter 3. Derivational paradigms in diachrony 
and comparison

| University of California, Berkeley

Wordlists used for subgrouping and long-range comparison under-utilize the verbal lexicon, and comparative work of all kinds makes more use of lexical roots and inflectional morphology than word formation. This chapter is a first attempt to utilize derivational morphology of verbs, in particular typologies of derivational processes and derivational bases, in subgrouping and external comparison of several language families of Eurasia. The basic method has four steps: set up a closed list of well-defined lexemes; set up a derivational type or paradigm or space and situate each word in that paradigm; determine which, if any, of the words or word forms in the paradigm is basic; and utilize what can be known about how the base determines the evolution of the whole set. It turns out that properties of the base plus the structure of the paradigm, together with some minimal information about the cognacy and/or segmental structure of the root, can yield a surprisingly good subgrouping from a small wordlist. Addition of this approach to the usual set of comparative procedures could increase the rigor of external comparison.

Published online: 8 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.161.08nic
References
Anthony, David W
2007 The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Donohue, Mark, Musgrave, Simon, Whiting, Bronwen & Wichmann, Søren
2011 Typological feature analysis models linguistic geography. Language 87(1): 369–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Terrill, Angela, Reesink, Ger P., Foley, Robert A. & Levison, Stephen C
2005 Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309: 2072–2075. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H
1960 An Afro-Asiatic pattern of gender and number agreement. Journal of the American Oriental Society 80: 317–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Language in the Americas. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huson, Daniel H. & Bryant, David
2006 Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(3): 254–267.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
2001 Indo-Uralic and Ural-Altaic: On the diachronic implications of areal typology. In Early Contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and Archaeological Considerations, Christian Carpelan, Asko Parpola & Petteri Koskikallio (eds), 207–220. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian Society.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
1998 The history of Turkic. In The Turkic Languages, Lars Johanson & Éva Ágnes Csató (eds), 81–125. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Joki, Aulis J
1973 Uralier und Indogermanen: Die älteren Berührungen zwischen den uralischen und indogermanischen Sprachen. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.Google Scholar
Koivulehto, Jorma
2000 Finno-Ugric reflexes of Northwest Indo-European and early stages of Indo-Iranian. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference, Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin E. Huld & Angela Della Volpe (eds), 21–44. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
2001 The earliest contacts between Indo-European and Uralic speakers in the light of lexical loans. In Early Contacts between Uralic and Indo-European: Linguistic and Archaeological Considerations, Christian Carpelan, Asko Parpola & Petteri Koskikallio (eds), 235–263. Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
2009 Valence-changing categories in Indo-Aryan and Indo-European: A diachronic typological portrait of Vedic Sanskrit. In Multilingualism. Proceedings of the 23rd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Ajnu Saxena & Ake Viberg (eds), 75–92. Uppsala: Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, Jerzy
1947 La nature des procès dits analogiques. Acta Linguistica 5: 17–34.Google Scholar
1964 The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2012 Basic valence orientation and the middle voice in Hittite. Studies in Language 36(1): 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Ringe, Don & Warnow, Tandy
2005 Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81: 382–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1996 The comparative method as heuristic. In The Comparative Method Reviewed: Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change, Mark Durie & Malcolm D. Ross (eds), 39–71. Melbourne: OUP.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, Peterson, David A. & Barnes, Jonathan
2004 Transitivizing and detransitivizing languages. Linguistic Typology 8(2): 149–211. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
2006 Quasi-cognates and lexical type shifts: Rigorous distance measures for long-range comparison. In Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, James Clackson, Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds), 57–65. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
2009 Expanding character sets for phylogeny: A Slavic test case. In Discovering History Through Language: Papers in Honor of Malcolm Ross, Bethwyn Evans (ed), 127–151. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius
1959 Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don, Warnow, Tandy & Taylor, Ann
2002 Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100: 59–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rix, Helmut
2001 Lexikon der indogermanischen Verben. Die Wurzeln und ihre Primärstammbildungen. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1913 Wiyot and Yurok, Algonkin languages of California. American Anthropologist 15: 617–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I
2004 The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Stroemqvist & L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985 Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Lexical Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Tim Shopen (ed.), 36–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht & Nichols, Johanna
2013 Better characters for better phylogenies: Slavic test cases. Presented at ICHL 21 , Oslo.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
2011 The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Grünthal, Riho & Johanna Nichols
2016. Transitivizing-detransitivizing typology and language family history. Lingua Posnaniensis 58:2 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.