Cover not available
Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 129–156

More Thoughts on the Grammaticalization of Personal Pronouns

Evidence from the history of Japanese

The grammatical category of personal pronouns is one of the most researched domains in Japanese as well as in other languages. In fact, works on the genesis and development of Japanese personal pronouns in comparison to those in other languages have been continuously reported long before the notion of grammaticalization was introduced and became an important concept in studies of language change. While preceding studies mostly lay emphasis on the different behaviors between Japanese personal pronouns and the counterparts in European languages, Heine and Song (2010, 2011) exemplify some features common among particular sets of languages i.e. referential shifting between different pronouns, especially from third to second person. As a supplemental survey to Heine and Song (2010, 2011), the present study aims to point out other pathways, especially from first to second person, through which personal pronouns are grammaticalized more in Japanese than in other languages.

Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.162.08shi
References
Aoki, Saburo
1989 Bumpoo no taishooteki kenkyuu: Furansugo to Nihongo (A contrastive analysis of grammar in French and Japanese). In Nihongo to Nihongokyooiku, 5 (Japanese and Japanese Pedagogy 5), Yoshinori Yamaguchi (ed.), 290-311. Tokyo: Meiji-shoin.Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2000 The development of person agreement markers. In Usage-Based Models of Language, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 197-260. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bhat, Darbhe Naryana Shankara
2004 Pronouns. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biq, Yang-O
1991 The multiple uses of the second person singular pronoun ni in conversational Mandarin. Journal of Pragmatics 16: 307-321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, Frank Ringgold
1934 The origin of pronouns of the first and second person. The American Journal of Philology 55: 244-248. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, David
1993 Pronouns in Burmese-Lolo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 16 (1): 157-215.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1904 Die Demonstrativpronomina der Indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L
2003 Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 145-167. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2007 Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camara Jr., Joaquim Mattoso
1972 The Portuguese Language, translated by Anthony J. Naro. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
1999 Historical Linguistics, 1st edn. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen-Ren
1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chiat, Shulamuth
1986 Personal pronouns. In Language Acquisition, 2nd edn, Paul Fletcher & Michael Garman (eds), 339-355. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chirasombutti, Voravudhi
1995 Self-Reference in Japanese and Thai. A Comparative Study. PhD dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R
1968 Pronominal Reference in Thai, Burmese, and Vietnamese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, Florian
2005 Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speaker’s Choices. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cysouw, Michael A
2003 The Paradigmatic Structure of Person Marking. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999 Demonstratives [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diller, Anthony
2001 Grammaticalization and Tai syntactic change. In Essays in Tai Linguistics, M.R. Kalaya Tingsabadh & Arthur S. Abramson (eds), 139-175. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Durie, Mark
1985 A Grammar of Acehnese. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J
2007 A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Nicholas & Wilkins, David
2000 In the mind’s ear: Semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language 76(3): 546-592. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010 A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujii, Noriko
1991 Historical Discourse Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fukui, Kyuzo
(ed.) 1938 Kokugogaku Taikei 15 (An outline of the Japanese Language 15). Tokyo: Kooseikaku.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1976 Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Topic and Subject, Charles N. Li (ed.), 149-89. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H
1998 From first to second person: The history of Amerind *k (i) . In Functional Approaches to Language, Culture and Cognition [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 163], David G. Lockwood, Peter H. Fries & James E. Copeland (eds), 413-426. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83-101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Song, Kyung-An
2010 On the genesis of personal pronouns: Some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition 2(1): 117-148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 47: 587–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helmbrecht, Johannes
2004 Personal Pronouns. Erfurt: University of Erfurt.Google Scholar
Ide, Sachiko & Yoshida, Megumi
1999 Sociolinguistics: Honorifics and titles. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), 444-480. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Akihiko
1972 Daimeishi no Hensen (Transition of pronouns). Hinshibetsu Nihon Bumpoo Kooza 2: Meishi Daimeishi (Japanese Grammar Series 2: Nouns and Pronouns), Kazuhiko Suzuki & Ohoki Hayashi (eds), 123-162. Tokyo: Meiji-shoin.Google Scholar
Ishiyama, Osamu
2008 Diachronic Perspectives on Personal Pronouns in Japanese. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, Shoichi & Ingkaphirom, Preeya
2009 A Reference Grammar of Thai. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jacquesson, Francois
2001 Person-marking in TB languages of north-east India. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24(1): 113-144.Google Scholar
Jahangiri, Nader
2000 A Sociolinguistic Study of Persian in Teheran. Tokyo: Institute for the Study of Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1924 The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Stefan, Ichikawa, Yasuko, Kobayashi, Noriko & Yamamoto, Hilofumi
2001 Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar, 1st edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kikusawa, Ritsuko
2002 Proto Central Pacific Ergativity. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Lehrer, Adrienne
1990 Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739-759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitahara, Yasuo
(ed.) 2002 Meikyo Kokugo Jiten (The Meikyo Dictionary of the Japanese Language). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2006 Nihon Kokugo Daijiten (The Unabridged Dictionary of the Japanese Language), 2nd edn. Tokyo: Shogakukan.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop. & Ramsey, S. Robert
2000 The Korean Language. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A
1981 Mandarin Chinese. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Listen, Paul
1999 The Emergence of German Polite Sie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Lockwood, William Burley
1968 Historical German Syntax. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej & Siewierska, Anna
(eds) 2011 Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matsumoto, Katsumi
2010 Personal Pronouns of the World’s Languages and Their Genetic Relationship (written in Japanese). Tokyo: Sanseido.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Kazuko
2003 Intonation Units in Japanese Conversation [Studies in Language Companion Series 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew Jr
1967 The Japanese Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1999 The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Miwa, Masashi
2000 Ninshooshi to Keigo (Personal Pronouns and Honorifics). Kyoto: Jinbun-shoin.Google Scholar
2005 Ichininsho Nininsho to Taiwa (Dialogue with First and Second Person). Kyoto: Jinbun-shoin.Google Scholar
2010 Nihongo Ninshooshi no Fushigi(The Mystery of Japanese Personal Pronouns). Kyoto: Houritsubunka-sha.Google Scholar
Morimoto, Tetsuro
1985 Nihongo no Omote to Ura (The Inside and Outside of the Japanese Language). Tokyo: Shinchosha.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, Peter & Harré, Rom
1990 Pronouns and People. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
2008 Functional Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norman, Jerry
1988 Chinese. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nguyen, Ðình-Hoà
1997 Vietnamese [London Oriental and African Language Library 9]. Amsterdam: John Banjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Patricia E
1994 ‘You could feel it through the skin’: Agency and positioning in prisoners’ stubbing stories. Text 14(1): 45-75.Google Scholar
Oshima-Takane, Yuriko
1992 Analysis of pronominal errors: A case study. Journal of Child Language 19: 111-131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ri, Chōha
2002 Nihongo Shiji Taikei no Rekishi (The History of the Japanese Demonstrative Paradigm). Kyoto: Kyoto University Press.Google Scholar
Sakihara, Mitsugo
2006 Okinawan-English Wordbook. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Sakuma, Kanae
1936 Gendai Nihongo no Hyoogen to Gohoo (Expressions and Phraseologies in Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Kooseikaku.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1929 The status of linguistics as a science. Language 5(1): 207-214. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibasaki, Reijirou
2005 Personal Pronouns and Argument Structure in Japanese. Discourse Frequency, Diachrony and Typology. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
2006 Where does first person go across time and space? Journal of Foreign Language 9 (2): 43-54.Google Scholar
2008 Subject cliticization in English and Japanese: A case of second person forms. Southern Review 23: 113-130.Google Scholar
2010 Frequency as a cause of semantic change. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christoph Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds), 225-244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2011 Another look at the grammaticalization of personal pronouns: A supplemental survey to Heine & Song (2010, 2011). Ms, Okinawa International University.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2004 Person. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sohn, Ho-Min
1994 Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Solnit, David B
1997 Eastern Kayah Li. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Sugamoto, Nobuko
1989 Pronominality: A noun-pronoun continuum. In Linguistic Categorization [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 61], Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman & Michael Noonan (eds), 267-291. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto, Tsutomi
1983 Nihon Honyakugoshi no Kenkyuu (A Historical Survey of the Works on Japanese Translations). Tokyo: Yasaka-shoten.Google Scholar
2003 Kindai yakugo o kenshoosuru (An inspection of Modern Japanese translation). Kokubungakukaishaku to Kanshoo 68: 236-243.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Takao
1973 Kotoba to Bunka (Language and Culture). Tokyo: Iwanami-bunko.Google Scholar
1982 Jishooshi to taishooshi no hikaku (A contrastive study of terms for self and other). In Nichiei Hikaku Kooza, 5 (A Contrastive Study of Japanese and English 5), Tetsuya Kunihiro (ed.), 17-59. Tokyo: Taishuukan-shoten.Google Scholar
Terasawa, Yoshio
(ed.) 1997 The Kenkyusha Dictionary of English Etymology. Tokyo: Kenkyusha.Google Scholar
Thompson, Laurence C
1987 A Vietnamese Reference Grammar. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29-72. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tsujimura, Toshihiko
1968 Keigo no Shiteki Kenkyuu (A Historical Study of the Japanese Respect Terms). Tokyo: Tokyodoo.Google Scholar
Ueda, Kazutoshi
(ed.) 1965 Daijiten (Encyclopedia of Words). Tokyo: Kodan-sha.Google Scholar
Von Humboldt, Wilhelm
1830 Über die Verwandtschaft der Ortsadverbien mit dem Pronomen in einigen Sprachen. Berlin: Gedruckt in der Druckerei der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Wheatley, Julian K
2007 Burmese. In The Sino-Tibetan Languages, Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds), 195-207. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yamada, Y
1915 Heikemonogatari no Gohoo (Phraseologies of The Tale of the Heike). Tokyo: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
Yan, Yi & Siewierska, Anna
2011 Referential impersonal constructions in Mandarin. In Impersonal Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 124], Andrej Malchukov & Anna Siewierska (eds), 547-580. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yap, Foong Ha, Wang, Jiao & Tsz-Kwan, Lam Charles
2011 From anaphoric to pragmatic: On the grammaticalization of Classical Chinese ĕr . Paper presented at ICHL20 >, Osaka, Japan.

Corpus

The Corpus of Contemporary American English
1990-2012 (COCA), Brigham Young University UT. (Mark Davies).
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.