Cover not available
Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 181–202

The different developments of progressive aspect markers be in the middle/midst of and be in the process of V-ing

mechanisms of change

In this case study, we reconstruct the grammaticalization paths of middle, midst and process, which led to a set of progressive aspect markers (PAMs) in Present-day English. The three PAMs developed from two different source structures, viz. complex prepositions in the middle/midst of + NP and complex appositive noun phrase the process of + NP. The main theoretical aim of the diachronic reconstruction is to identify and characterize the main mechanisms of change that affected the different structures with these nouns on their grammaticalization trajectories: (i) reanalysis in the sense of functional reparsing of an existing structure; (ii) analogization: the attraction of new functional properties to an existing structure; (iii) neo-analysis by analogy: the creation of a functional structure that is new in the item’s trajectory of change. We also discuss how these mechanisms of change interact with enabling factors such as metaphor and metonymy, collocational fixation, expansion and reclustering, and discursive functions.

Published online: 24 September 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.162.10rom
References
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
2012 A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88: 1-44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Hopper, Paul
(eds) 2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brems, Lieselotte
2007 The Synchronic Layering of Size noun and Type Noun Constructions in English. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991 A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2008 Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Gerunds, participles and for…to-infinitives. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
2012 The course of actualization. Language 88: 601-633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fried, Miriam
2010 Grammaticalization and lexicalization effects in participial morphology: A Construction Grammar approach to language change. In Formal Evidence in Grammaticalization Research [Typological Studies in Language 94], An Van linden, Jean-Christophe Verstraete & Kristin Davidse (eds), 191-223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1993 English Grammar. A Function-Based Introduction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
2004 Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In What Makes Grammaticalization. A Look from its Components and its Fringes, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelman & Björn Wiemer (eds), 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2005 Grammaticalization and English Complex Prepositions. A Corpus-based Study. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987 Emergent Grammar. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics. Society, 139-157.Google Scholar
1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17-36.
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2003 Collostructions. Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koops, Chris
2004 Emergent aspect constructions in Present-Day English. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 121-154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
1970 Some properties of non-referential noun phrases. In Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics, Roman Jacobson & Shigeo Kawamoto (eds), 348-373. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1977 Syntactic reanalysis. In Mechanisms of Syntactic Change, Charles N. Li (ed.), 57-139. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, 1: Theoretical Prequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, James
1992 English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1985 Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303-318.Google Scholar
Margerie, Hélène
2012 The grammaticalization of NP ADJ ADJ/NP1 VB NP2 ADJ patterns. Paper presented at International Conference on Grammaticalization: Theory and Data. Rouen, 10-11 May.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007 Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2): 177-202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
OED. Oxford English Dictionary
[URL]
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1972 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & König, Ekkehard
1991 The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, I [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 189-218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2010 Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In Gradualness, Gradience, and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 19-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Gradualness in language change: A constructional perspective. In Synchrony and Diachrony: A Dynamic Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 133], Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri & Piera Mol (eds), 27-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy
2007 Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rompaey, Tinne
2014 A comparison of progressive be V-ing with be in the middle, midst, process or act of V-ing: the interaction of lexical and grammatical progressive aspect. Transactions of the Philological Society . DOI logo
Forthcoming. Discourse conditions in language change: From binominal to aspectualizer be in the middle or midst of V-ing . Language Sciences.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Van Rompaey, Tinne, Kristin Davidse & Peter Petré
2015. Lexicalization and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 22:2 ► pp. 232 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.