Part of
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 235256
Anscombre, Jean Claude & Ducrot, Oswald
1977Deux mais en francais? Lingua 43: 23-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandez, M.M. Jocelyne
2006Vers une typologie linguistique du détachement à fondement ouralien d'Europe. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 101(1) : 173-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foolen, Ad
2011Pragmatic markers in a sociopragmatic perspective. In Pragmatics of Society, Gisle Andersen & Karin Aijmer (eds), 217-242. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra A.
1996Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Interaction and Grammar [Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 13], Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 134-184. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
2004The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphan approach. In Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Shuji Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Noria Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35: 852-897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2013On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205-1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A.
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Penry Williams
Cara 2009. Final but in Australian English conversation. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds) 337 358 Amsterdam John Benjamins DOI logo
Pomerantz, Anita
1984Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features found in preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of Social Action, Studies in Conversation Analysis, J. Maxwell Atkinson & John Heritage (eds), 232–254. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Jefferson, Gail, Sacks, Harvey
1977The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 52: 361-382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2007Discussion article: Discourse markers, modal particles, and contrastive analysis, synchronic and diachronic. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 139-157.Google Scholar
2010Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon, Robert A. Cloutier, Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm & William Kretzschmar (eds), 11-27. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich
2007Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61-80.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2012On the origins of grammaticalization and other types of language change in discourse strategies. In Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 51-72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Aijmer, Karin
2016. Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],  pp. 29 ff. DOI logo
Hancil, Sylvie
2018. Discourse coherence and intersubjectivity: The development of final but in dialogues. Language Sciences 68  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.