Article published in:
Grammaticalization – Theory and Data
Edited by Sylvie Hancil and Ekkehard König
[Studies in Language Companion Series 162] 2014
► pp. 257286
References

References

Abraham, Werner
1991The grammaticization of the German modal particles. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. II, Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 331–380. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
2002On the development of final though . In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 345-61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1992The historical present in Charlotte Bronte's novels: Some discourse functions. Style 26(2): 221-244.Google Scholar
Chin, J.
1987Syuujoshi: Hanashite-to kikite-no ninshiki-no gyappu-o umeru-tameno bunsetsuji. Nihongogaku 6(10): 93-109.Google Scholar
Christofer, Michael
1996Koi-ni Ochite (Falling in Love) [Kadokawa Script Book Series]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray
1997Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry 28(2): 195-217.Google Scholar
Davison, Alice
1979Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9(1): 105-128.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Schuetze-Coburn, Stephan, Cumming, Susanna & Paolino, Danae
1993Outline of discourse transcription. In Talking Data: Transcription and Coding in Discourse Research, Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds), 45-89. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A.
2000Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part One. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. <http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research/ santa-barbara-corpusGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles, Thompson, Sandra A. & Martey, Nii
2003Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Two. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. <http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpus>Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Englebretson, Robert
2004Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Three. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. <http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpus>Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., & Englebretson, Robert
2005Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English, Part Four. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium. <http://​www​.linguistics​.ucsb​.edu​/research​/santa​-barbara​-corpus>Google Scholar
Evans, Nicolas
2007Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fujiwara, Yoichi
1982Hoogen Bunmatsushi ‘Bunmatsujoshi’ no Kenkyuu (Joo). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
1986Hoogen Bunmatsushi ‘Bunmatsujoshi’ no Kenkyuu (Ge). Tokyo: Shunyoodoo.Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander
2011Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance-final then in spoken English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 3603–3623. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2007Coordination. In Language Typology and Linguistic Description, II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 1-51. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1973On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4(4): 465-197.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2012Exaptation and adaptation: Two historical routes to final particles. A paper presented at the 45th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, Stockholm University, August 2012.Google Scholar
2013From discourse markers to modal particles: Where the position reveals about the continuum. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description, Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie & Paoala Pietrandrea (eds), 217-235. Leuven: University of Louvain. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Izutsu, Katsunobu
2014aTruncation and backshift: Two pathways to sentence-final coordinating conjunctions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15(1): 92-122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014b‘Leap’ or ‘continuum’?: Grammaticalization pathways from conjunctions to sentence-final particles. In Language and Creative Mind, Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds), 83-99. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1987Rhetorical Structure Theory: A Theory of Text Organization, USC Information Sciences Institute, Technical Report ISI/RS-87-190.Google Scholar
Masuoka, Takashi
1997Fukubun. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Akira
(ed.) 1971Nihon Bunpoo Daijiten. Tokyo: Meijishoin.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1988The structure of discourse and ‘subordination.’ In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 275-329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio
1974Gendai Nihongo-no Koozoo. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
1993Gendai Nihongo Bunpoo-no Rinkaku. Tokyo: Taishukan.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita
1979Final parentheticals with English questions – Their illocutionary function and grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 3: 401-412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A.
2006The Grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Selected Papers From the 2005 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society, Keith Allan (ed.), 1–18. <http://​www​.als​.asn​.au>Google Scholar
2008The grammaticization of but as a final particle in English conversation. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions [Typological Studies in Language 80], Ritva Laury (ed), 179–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, Jean, Thompson, Sandra A. & Williams, Cara Penny
2009Final but in Australian English Conversation. In Comparative Studies in Australian and New Zealand English: Grammar and Beyond [Varieties of English around the World G39], Pam Peters, Peter Collins & Adam Smith (eds), 339–359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nakano, N.
1992“Ne”-to “yo”-no hataraki-nitsuite. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Yamaguchi University 41(1): 1-18.Google Scholar
1995Shuujoshi “sa”-to “na”-no hataraki-nitsuite. In Tsukishima Hiroshi Hakushi Koki Kinen Kokugogaku Ronsyuu, Tsukishima Hiroshi Hakushi Koki Kinenkai (ed.), 1063-1085. Tokyo: Kyukoshoin.Google Scholar
Noda, Naoshi, Masuoka, Takashi, Sakuma, Mayumi & Takubo, Yukinori
2002Fukubun-to Danwa. Tokyo: Iwanami.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neil R.
2009Conjunctions in final position in everyday talk. In Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, Bruce Fraser & Ken Turner (eds), 319-328. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio
1995Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics: In Honor of Charles J. Fillmore [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2000aFraming effects in Japanese non-final clauses: Toward an optimal grammar-pragmatics interface. BLS 23: 471–480.Google Scholar
2000bGengochishiki-toshite-no koobun: Fukubun-no ruikeiron-ni-mukete. In Ninchigengogaku-no Hatten, Shigeru Sakahara (ed.), 281-315. Tokyo: Hituzi.Google Scholar
Ozaki, Makoto & Saeki, Namie
1991Hachigatsu-no Kujira (The Whales of August): English-Japanese Screen Library 6. Tokyo: Nanundoo.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1984Principles of gestalt perception in the temporal organization of narrative texts. Linguistics 22: 779-809.Google Scholar
Ross, Eric & Groom, Winston
1996Foresuto Ganpu: Ichigo Ichie (Forest Gump) [Kadokawa Script Book Series]. Tokyo: Kadokawa.Google Scholar
Sakuma, Kanae
1983Gendai Nihongohoo-no Kenkyuu, rev. edn. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Saji, Keizo
1957Shuujoshi-no Kinoo. Kokugokokubun 26(7): 23-31.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shirakawa, Hiroyuki
2009‘Iisashibun’ no Kenkyuu. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Hideo
1976Gendai nihongo-niokeru syuujoshi-no hataraki-to sono soogo shoosetsu-nitsuite. Kokugo-to Kokubungaku 53(11): 58-70.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Taro
1993Shooryaku-niyotte dekita jutsugo keishiki. Nihongogaku 9(12): 18-26.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1990You just don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A.
1987“Subordination” and narrative event structure. In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 11], Russell S. Tomlin (ed.), 435-454. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Longacre, Robert E.
1985Adverbial clauses. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, II: Complex Constructions, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 171-234. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tomlin, Russell S.
1985Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5(1-2): 85-122.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich
2012 Moi, je ne sais pas vs. je ne sais pas, moi: French disjoint pronouns in the left vs. right periphery. Abstract of a paper presented at Newcastle/Northumbria Joint Linguistics and Language Sciences Research Day, Northumbria University, January 2012.Google Scholar
Yoda, Yusuke
2010Sore wa Hontooni Tooikoozo? Nihongo Nihonbunka Kenkyuu20: 65–75.Google Scholar