Article published in:
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 133174
References

References

Arkadiev, Peter M.
2009Differential argument marking in two-term case systems and its implications for the general theory of case marking. In Differential Subject Marking, Helen de Hoop & Peter Swart (eds), 151–171. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baart, Joan L.G.
1999A Sketch of Kalam Kohistani Grammar. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2003Tonal features in languages of Northern Pakistan. In Pakistani Languages and Society: Problems and Prospects, Joan L.G. Baart & Ghulam Hyder Sindhi (eds), 132–144.Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies Quaid-i-Azam University and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Baart, Joan L.G. & Sagar, Muhammad Zaman
2004Kalam Kohistani texts. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies and Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bailey, Thomas Grahame
1924Grammar of the Shina (Sina) Language; Consisting of a Full Grammar, with Texts and Vocabularies of the Main or Gilgiti Dialect and Briefer Grammars (with Vocabularies and Texts) of the Kohistani, Guresi, and Drasi Dialects. London: Royal Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Bashir, Elena L.
1988Topics in Kalasha Syntax: An Areal and Typological Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
1996Mosaic of tongues: Quotatives and complementizers in Northwest Indo-Aryan, Burushaski, and Balti. In Studies in Pakistani Popular Culture, William Hanaway & Wilma, Heston (eds), 187–286. Lahore: Lok Virsa Pub. House and Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar
2003Dardic. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Danesh Jain (eds), 818–894. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Berger, Hermann
1992Das Burushaski: Schicksale einer zentralasiatischen Restsprache. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
1998Die Burushaski-Sprache von Hunza und Nager 3. Wörterbuch. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2007Typology in the 21st Century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 239–251. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Grammatical Relations Typology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.) 399–444. Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2008Referential scales and case alignment: Reviewing the typological evidence. In Scales [Linguistische Arbeits Berichte 86], Marc Richards & Andrej L. Malchukov (eds), 1–37. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik der Universität Leipzig.<http://​uzh​.academia​.edu​/BalthasarBickel​/Papers​/1463424​/Referential​_scales​_and​_case​_alignment​_reviewing​_the​_typological​_evidence> (12 February 2014). Google Scholar
Buddruss, Georg
1967Die Sprache Von Sau in Ostafghanistan: Beiträge Zur Kenntnis Des Dardischen Phalûra [Münchener Studien Zur Sprachwissenschaft Beiheft, Supplement] Munich: Kitzinger in Kommission.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Ahmed, Tafseer
2010The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21(3–4): 545–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1978Ergativity. In Syntactic Typology: Studies in the Phenomenology of Language, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 329–394. Austin TX: University of Texas Press. <http://​www​.utexas​.edu​/cola​/centers​/lrc​/books​/type07​.html> (12 February 2014). Google Scholar
2013Alignment of case marking of full noun phrases. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/98> (12 February 2014).Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2003Agreement: The range of the phenomenon and the principles of the Surrey Database of Agreement. Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 155–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degener, Almuth
2008Shina-Texte aus Gilgit (Nord-Pakistan): Sprichwörter und Materialien zum Volksglauben, gesammelt von Zia, Mohammad Amin. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini & Sharma, Devyani
2006Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3): 369–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1987Studies in ergativity: Introduction. Lingua 71(1–4): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Methodology 1. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2007Clause types. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Clause Structure I, 2nd edn, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224–275. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Edelman, Dzhoi Iosifovna
1983The Dardic and Nuristani Languages, translated from the Russian by E.H. Tsipan [Languages of Asia and Africa (Moscow, R.S.F.S.R.)]. Moscow: Nauka, Central Dept. of Oriental Literature.Google Scholar
Emeneau, Murray Barnson
1965India and Historical Grammar: (Lecture on Diffusion and Evolution in Comparative Linguistics.. . Delivered.. . at the Linguistics Department of the Annamalai University in 1959) [Publications in Linguistics]. Annamalai: Dept. of Linguistics, Annamalai University.Google Scholar
1980India and linguistic areas. In Language and Linguistic Area: Essays, 126–166. Standford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Filimonova, Elena
2005The noun phrase hierarchy and relational marking: Problems and counterevidence. Linguistic Typology 9(1): 77–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fussman, Gérard
1972Atlas linguistique des parlers dardes et kafirs. Paris: École française d’Extrême-Orient; Dépositaire: Adrien-Maisónneuve.Google Scholar
Gildea, Spike
2004Are there universal cognitive motivations for ergativity? In L'ergativité en Amazonie, Francisco Queixalós (ed.), 1–37.Brasilia: CNRS, IRD and the Laboratório de Línguas Indígenas, UnB.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
2001Syntax. An Introduction 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(01): 25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Parametric versus functional explanations of syntactic universals. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 75–108. John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heegård Petersen, Jan
2006Local Case-marking in Kalasha. PhD dissertation. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich
1986‘P-oriented’ constructions in Sanskrit. In South Asian Languages: Structure, Convergence and Diglossia, Colin P. Masica & Anjani Kumar Sinha (eds), 15–26. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter Edwin
1996Kesar of Layul: A central Asian epic in the Shina of Gultari. In Studies in Pakistani Popular Culture, William Hanaway & Wilma Heston (eds), 121–183.Lahore: Lok Virsa Pub. House and Sang-e-Meel Publications.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E. & Koul, Omkar N.
2004Case as agreement: Non-nominative subjects in Eastern Shina, non-dative objects in Kashmiri and Poguli, and labile subjects in Kashmiri and Gujarai intransitive inceptives. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 213–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kibrik, Aleksandr E.
1979Canonical ergativity and Daghestan languages. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 61–77. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1987Mechanisms of ergativity in South Asia. Lingua 71(1–4): 61–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria
2010Linguistic typology and language contact. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 568–590. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Koul, Omkar N.
2003Kashmiri. In The Indo-Aryan Languages, George Cardona & Danesh Jain (eds), 895–952. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liljegren, Henrik
2008Towards a Grammatical Description of Palula: An Indo-Aryan Language of the Hindu Kush. Stockholm: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
2009The Dangari tongue of Choke and Machoke: Tracing the Proto-language of Shina enclaves in the Hindu Kush. Acta Orientalia 70: 7–62.Google Scholar
Lunsford, Wayne A.
2001An Overview of Linguistic Structures in Torwali, a Language of Northern Pakistan. MA thesis, University of Texas at Arlington.
Manning, Christopher D.
1996Ergativity: Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1991The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2001The definition and significance of linguistic areas: Methods, pitfalls, and possibilities (with special reference to the validity of South Asia as a linguistic area). In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 2001, Peri Bhaskararao (ed.), 205–267. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Morgenstierne, Georg
1932Report on a Linguistic Mission to North-western India. New Dehli: Indus Publications.Google Scholar
1947Some features of Khowar morphology. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap 14: 5–28.Google Scholar
1967Indo-Iranian Frontier Languages 3, The Pashai Language 1, Grammar.Instituttet for Sammenlignende Kulturforskning. Serie B, Skrifter, 40:3:1.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1993Ergativity and linguistic geography. Australian Journal of Linguistics 13(1): 39–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003Diversity and stability in language. In The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds), 283–310. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R.
1980The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages. Lingua 51(2–3): 147–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pirejko, Lija A.
1979On the genesis of the ergative construction in Indo-Iranian. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 481–488. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans
1979Ergativity, syntactic typology and Universal Grammar: Some past and present viewpoints. In Ergativity: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations, Frans Plank (ed.), 3–36. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Radloff, Carla F. & Ahmad, Shakil
1998Folktales in the Shina of Gilgit: Text, Grammatical Analysis and Commentary. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies, Quaid-i-Azam University; Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Rahman, Tariq
2011From Hindi to Urdu: A Social and Political History. Karachi: OUP.Google Scholar
Rehman, Khawaja A.
2011Ergativity in Kundal Shahi, Kashmiri and Hindko. In Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, Mark Turin & Bettina Zeisler (eds). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Rensch, Calvin R., Decker, Sandra J. & Hallberg, Daniel G.
1992Languages of Kohistan [Sociolinguitic Survey of Northern Pakistan 1]. Islamabad: National Institute of Pakistan Studies.Google Scholar
Roberts, John R.
2009A Study of Persian Discourse Structure [Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 12]. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth Laila
1985Where have the Shina speakers come from? Some linguistic clues. Journal of Central Asia 8(1): 17–26.Google Scholar
1999Urdu. An Essential Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth Laila & Kaul, Vijay Kumar
2008A comparative analysis of Shina and Kashmiri vocabularies. Acta Orientalia 69: 231–302.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Ruth Laila & Kohistani, Razwal
2008A Grammar of the Shina Language of Indus Kohistan [Beiträge Zur Kenntnis Südasiatischer Sprachen and Literaturen 17]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna
2013Alignment of verbal person marking. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/100> (12 February 2014).Google Scholar
Skalmowski, Wojciech
1974Transitive verb constructions in the Pamir and Dardic languages. In Studia Indoeuropejskie. Etudes Indo-européennes, 205–216. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich.Google Scholar
1985The linguistic importance of the Dardic languages. Journal of Central Asia 8(1): 5–15.Google Scholar
Strand, Richard F.
2001The tongues of Peristân. Appendix 1. In Gates of Peristan: History, Religion and Society in the Hindu Kush [Reports and Memoirs 5], Alberto M. Cacopardo & Augusto S. Cacopardo (eds), 251–257. Rome: IsIAO.Google Scholar
Stroński, Krzysztof
2009Variation of ergativity patterns in Indo-Aryan. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(2): 237–253.Google Scholar
2011Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects of Ergativity in Indo-Aryan. Poznan: Wydawn. Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey
2001Language Contact. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tikkanen, Bertil
1988On Burushaski and other ancient substrata in Northwestern South Asia. Studia Orientalia 64: 3030–325.Google Scholar
1999Archaeological-linguistic correlations in the formation of retroflex typologies and correlating areal features in South Asia. In Archaeology and Language, Roger Blench (ed.), 138–148. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2008Some areal phonological isoglosses in the transit zone between South and Central Asia. In Proceedings of the Third International Hindu Kush Cultural Conference, by Israr-ud-Din (ed.), 250–262. Karachi: OUP.Google Scholar
Trask, Robert L.
1979On the origins of ergativity. In Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations, Frans Plank (ed.) 385–404. London; New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Turner, R.L.
1927Notes on Dardic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 4(03): 533–541. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verbeke, Saartje
2011Ergativity and Alignment in Indo-Aryan. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
Verbeke, Saartje & De Cuypere, Ludovic
2009The rise of ergativity in Hindi. Folia Linguistica Historica 30: 1–24.Google Scholar
Verma, Mahendra K. & Mohanan, K.P.
1991Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena
2010Typological Variation in Grammatical Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.
Zeisler, Bettina
2004Relative Tense and Aspectual Values in Tibetan Languages: a Comparative Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zoller, Claus Peter
2005A Grammar and Dictionary of Indus Kohistani 1: Dictionary [Trends in Linguistics 21–1]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Heegård, Jan & Henrik Liljegren
2018. Geomorphic coding in Palula and Kalasha. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Liljegren, Henrik
2018. Profiling Indo-Aryan in the Hindukush-Karakoram: A preliminary study of micro-typological patterns . Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 4:1  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Liljegren, Henrik
2020. The Hindu Kush–Karakorum and linguistic areality. Journal of South Asian Languages and Linguistics 7:2  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.