Article published in:
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 339378
References

References

Arančin, Ju.L.. et al.
2001Istorija Tuvy. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Allkemper, Allo & Eke, Norbert Otto
2006Literaturwissenschaft. Paderborn: W. Fink.Google Scholar
Comrie Bernard
2000Evidentials: semantics and history. In Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 1-12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chappell, Hillary
1992Towards a typology of aspect in Sinitic languages. In Zhongguo Jingnei Yuyan ji Yuyanxue: Hanyu Fangyan (Chinese Languages and Linguistics: Chinese dialects) 1.1: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Chinese Languages and Linguistics, July 20–22 1990, 67–106. Taipei: Academia SinicaGoogle Scholar
Čeremisina, Maja Ivanovna, et al.
1986Strukturnye tipy sintetičeskix polipredikatnyx konstrukcii v jazykax raznyx sistem. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Erdal Marcel
2004A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Glück Helmut
2005Metzler Lexikon Sprache. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Golden, Peter B.
1992An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Isxakov, Fazil Garifovič & Pal'mbax, Aleksandr Adol‘fovič
1961Grammatika tuvinskogo jazyka. Fonetika i morfologija. Moskow: Izdatel’stvo vostočnoj literatury.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
1971Aspekt im Türkischen. Lund: Berlingska Boktryckeriet.Google Scholar
Johanson Lars
1994Türkeitürkische Aspektotempora. In Tense Systems in the European Languages, 247–266. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
2000Turkic indirectives. In Evidentials. Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages, Lars Johanson & Bo Utas (eds), 61-88. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2003Evidentiality in Turkic. In Studies in Evidentiality [Typological Studies in Language 54], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 273-390. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Indirective sentence types. Turkic Languages 10: 73–89.Google Scholar
Khiis, Gansux
2009Ocobennosti tuvinskoj reči žitelej Cengela. Avtoreferat dissertacii na soiskanie učenoj ctepeni kandidata filologičeskix nauk. Novosibirsk.Google Scholar
Mawkanuli, Talant
1999Phonology and Morphology of Jungar Tuva. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
2001The Jungar Tuvas: Language and national identity in the PRC. Central Asian Survey 20(4): 497–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Jungar Tuvan Texts. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.Google Scholar
Monguš, Marina V.
2002Tuvincy Mongolii i Kitaja. Novosibirsk: Nauka.Google Scholar
Nevskaya, Irina Anatolevna
2005Polipredikativnyx konstrukcii, obrazuemye formoj na -SA v šorskom jazyke. In Altajskie jazyki i vostočnaja filologija, Bičeldej, et al. (eds), 291-300. Moskow: Vostočnaja literatura, RAN.Google Scholar
Rind-Pawlowski, Monika
2014aNebensatzbildung im Dzungar-Tuvinischen. PhD dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
2014bText types and evidentiality in Dzungar Tuvan. Turkic Languages.Google Scholar
Sat, Š.Č.
1968O govore nacelenija Tere-Xolja. In Sbornik naučno-metodičeskix statej. Kyzyl: Gumanitarnye nauki.Google Scholar
1987Tïva Dialektologija. Kyzyl.Google Scholar
Seren, Polina Sergeevna
2006Tere-xol'skij dialekt tuvinskogo jazyka. Abakan: Naučnoe Izdanie.Google Scholar
Wang, Li
1957Hanyu Shigao (Draft History of Chinese). Beijing: Kexue Chubanshe.Google Scholar