Article published in:
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 379–400

On the evolution of Russian subject reference

Internal factors

| Lomonosov Moscow State University
Personal pronouns in Russian have replaced verbal inflection forms as the main reduced referential devices marking subject. Some possible internal scenarios of this process are examined, namely the present perfect reconstruction in Old Russian and the semantic similarity between Old Russian present nominal clauses and present verbal ones. Further testing of both hypotheses is based on the detailed chronological survey on 50 Old Russian texts (about 2000 relevant verbal clauses) from the 11th till the 17th century with the help of statistical methods (Student’s t-test and Lilliefors test). The diachronic study of Old Russian documents disproves the hypothesis of initial perfect tense destruction but admits the possibility of semantic factors as a trigger to the subject reference alternation.
Keywords: Old Russian, perfect tense, personal pronouns, statistical methods, subject reference
Published online: 17 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.13sid
References

References

Borkovskij, Viktor I. & Kuznecov, Petr S.
2006 [1963] Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (A Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: URSS.Google Scholar
Černyx, Pavel J.
1954 Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (A Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1990 Standard Average European as an exotic language. In Toward a Typology of European Languages [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 8], Johannes Bechert, Giuliano Bernini & Claude Buridant (eds), 3–8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Mattew
2011 Expression of pronominal subjects. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Ch.101, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library. <http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/101>Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Heine & Meyer, Roland
2011 Conditions on null subjects in Old Church Slavonic, a contrastive view. Paper presented atthe 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, July 25.
Givón, Thomas
(ed.) 1983 Topic Continuity in Discourse: A Quantitative Cross-language Study [Typological Studies in Language 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gorškova, Klavdija V. & Xaburgaev, Georgij A.
1981 Istoričeskaja grammatika russkogo jazyka (A Historical Grammar of Russian). Moscow: Vysšaja škola.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001 The European linguistic area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook 2, Martin Haspelmath (ed.), 1492–1510. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman O.
1971[1935] Les enclitiques slaves. In Selected Writings II, Roman Jakobson, 16–22. The Hague: Mouton. (Original publication: Atti del Congresso di Linguistica tenuto in Roma il 19–26 Settembre 1933. Firenze, 1935).Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976 Towards a universal definition of ‘Subject’. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 303–334. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kibrik, Andrej A.
2011 Reference in Discourse. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Peculiarities and origins of the Russian referential system. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (ed.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Koivulehto, Jorma
2002 Contact with non-Germanic languages II: Relations to the East. In The Nordic Languages: An International Handbook of the History of the North Germanic Languages, Oskar Bandle, Lennart Elmevik & Gun Widmark (eds), 583–594. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kopotev, Mikhail V.
2011 Reconstruction and idiomacity: The origin of Russian verbless clauses reconsidered. Paper presented atthe 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka. <www​.helsinki​.fi​/~kopotev​/kopotev​_reconstruction​_and​_idiomacity​.pdf>
Levšina, Natalia G.
2012 Results of statistical analysis of the data in Pavlova 2010. Ms,University of Jena.
Lindseth, Martina
1998 Null-subject Properties of Slavic Languages: with Special Reference to Russian, Czech and Sorbian. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V.
1985 Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s dejstvitelnostiju: referenzial’nyje aspecty semantiki mestoimenij (The utterance and its relation to reality: referential aspects of pronoun semantics). Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Pavlova, Elizaveta K.
2010 Vzaimosvjaz' meždu markirovaniem lica v glagole i v podležaščnom mestoimenii v russkom jazyke (Relationship between person marking on the verb and on subject pronoun in Russian). Year paper. Dept. of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Moscow State University.Google Scholar
Stone, Gerald
1993 Cassubian. In The Slavonic Languages, Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 759–794. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1993b Sorbian. In The Slavonic Languages, Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 593–685. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1956 Language, Thought and Reality. In Selected Writings of Benjamins Lee Whorf, John B. Carroll (eds)Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Xaburgaev, Georgij A.
1978 Sud’ba vspomogatel’nogo glagola drevnix slavjanskix analitičeskix form v russkom jazyke (The destiny of the auxiliary verbs in the Old Slavic analytic forms in Russian). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Philologija 1978(4): 42–53.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Andrej A.
2004[1995] Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt (Old Novgorod dialect). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury.Google Scholar
2008 Drevnerusskie ènklitiki (Old Russian enclitics). Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul'tury.Google Scholar