Cover not available
Part of
On Diversity and Complexity of Languages Spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia
Edited by Pirkko Suihkonen and Lindsay J. Whaley
[Studies in Language Companion Series 164] 2014
► pp. 401–420

The development of negation in the Transeurasian languages

| Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz

In this article, the historical development of sentential negation is compared across the Japonic, Koreanic, Tungusic, Mongolic, and Turkic languages to make inferences about the expression of negation in the common Transeurasian proto-language. Integrating typological considerations, including grammaticalization theory, into the argumentation, the approach taken here differs from previous studies, which are limited to form–function comparison of individual markers. The historical development of negation in the Transeurasian languages is argued to involve a grammaticalization pathway whereby an independent negative verb developed into a preposed negative auxiliary and then, either transferred its inflection to the lexical verb to become an invariant preposed particle or, else, moved to a postposed position to become a suffix on the lexical verb. Taken together with the form–function correspondences of the negative markers, these correlations lead to the reconstruction of genealogically motivated cycles of grammaticalization in the Transeurasian family.

Keywords: cyclic grammaticalization, diachronic typology, genealogical relationship, negation, Transeurasian languages
Published online: 17 December 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.164.14rob
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra
2013 Areal diffusion and parallelism in drift: Shared grammaticalization patterns. In Shared Grammaticalization with Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan
2009 The Jespersen cycles. In Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 35-71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 On the diachrony of negation. In The Expression of Negation, Lawrence Horn (ed.), 73-101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes
1955 Lamutische Grammatik, mit Bibliographie, Sprachproben und Glossar. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1959 Das Tschuwaschische. In Philologiae Turcicae Fundamenta. Tomus Primus, Jean Deny, Kaare Grönbech, Helmuth Scheel & Zeki Velidi Togan (eds), 695-751. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Bese, Lajos
1974 On the etymology of prohibition and negation in Mongolian. Central Asiatic Journal 18: 5–8.Google Scholar
Choi, Han-Woo
2005 Evidences of the affinity of Korean and Turkic. International Journal of Central Asian Studies 10: 29–52.Google Scholar
Clauson, Gerard
1972 An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-thirtheenth-century Turkisch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1981 Negation and other verb categories in the Uralic languages. In Congressus Quintis Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, vol. VI, Osmo Ikola (ed.), 350-355. Turku: Suomen Kielen Seura.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991 The evolution of negation. Journal of linguistics 27: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Östen
1979 Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17, 79–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew
2005 Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures, Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil & Bernard Comrie (eds), 454-457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Erdal, Marcel
1991 Old Turkic Word Formation. A Functional Approach to the Lexicon [Turcologica 7]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2004 A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Frellesvig, Bjarke
2010 A History of the Japanese Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2008 Negative cycles. Linguistic Typology 12: 195–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givón, T
2001 Syntax. An Introduction I. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gorelova, Liliya
2002 Manchu Grammar. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1998 Hermit crabs: Formal renewal of morphology by phonologically mediated affix substitution. Language 74: 728–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
1996 Prolegomena to a comparative analysis of Mongolic and Tungusic. In Proceedings of the 38th Permanent International Altaistic Conference in Kawasaki, Japan, 7–12 August 1995, Giovanni Stary (ed.), 209–218. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Johanson, Lars & Robbeets, Martine
2010 Introduction. In Transeurasian Verbal Morphology in a Comparative Perspective: Genealogy, Contact, Chance [Turcologica 78], Lars Johanson & Martine Robbeets (eds), 1–5. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Krüger, John
1961 Chuvash Manual. Introduction, Grammar, Reader and Vocabulary [Uralic and Altaic Series 7]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel Elmo
1987 The Japanese Language Through Time. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Recent research on the relationships of Japanese and Korean. In Sydney M. Lamb & Douglas E. Mitchell (eds). Sprung from Some Common Source: Investigations Into the Prehistory of Languages, 269–292. Stanford CA: University Press.Google Scholar
1992 A Reference Grammar of Korean. Tokyo: Tuttle.Google Scholar
1996 Consonant Lenition in Korean and the Macro-Altaic Question. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
1997 Un-Altaic features of the Korean verb. Japanese / Korean Linguistics 6: 3–40.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl Heinrich
1968 Die Tungusischen Sprachen [Handbuch der Orientalistik 1. Der Nahe und der Mittlere Osten 5. Altaistik 3. Tungusologie]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
1975 Altajische Studien, II. Japanisch und Altajisch [Abhandlungen für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 41(3)]. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
1984 Korean and Altaic. A preliminary sketch. Central Asiatic Journal 28: 234–295.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti
2005 Standard Negation: The Negation of Declarative Verbal Main Clauses in a Typological Perspective [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 31]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew
1971 Japanese and the Other Altaic Languages. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
1985 Altaic connections of the Old Japanese negatives. Central Asiatic Journal 31: 35–84.Google Scholar
Nedjalkov, Igor V
1994 Negation in Evenki. In Typological Studies in Negation [Typological Studies in Language 28], Peter Kahrel & René van den Berg (eds), 1–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina Alekseevna
1999 A Grammar of Udehe. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Payne, John R
1985 Negation. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, 1: Clause Structure, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 197–242. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1954 Grammar of Written Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1960 Vergleichende Grammatik der altaischen Sprachen, 1: Vergleichende Lautlehre [Porta Linguarum Orientalium, Neue Serie 4]. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1974 Zur Stellung des Tschuwaschischen. Central Asiatic Journal 18(2): 135–147.Google Scholar
1977 The problem of Uralic and Altaic affinity. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 58: 221–225.Google Scholar
Ramstedt, Gustaf John
1924 Die verneinung in den altaischen Sprachen. Eine semasiologische studie. Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 52: 196–215.Google Scholar
1935 Kalmückisches Wörterbuch. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1939 Studies in Korean Etymology. [Mémoires de la Société finno-ougrienne 95.] Helsinki: Suomalai-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1949 Studies in Korean Etymology [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 95]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
1952 Einführung in die altaische Sprachwissenschaft, II, Formenlehre [Mémoires de la Société Finno-Ougrienne 104( 2)]. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine
2005 Is Japanese Related to Korean, Tungusic, Mongolic and Turkic? [Turcologica 64]. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2013 Genealogically motivated grammaticalization. In Shared Grammaticalization: With Special Focus on the Transeurasian Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 132], Martine Robbeets & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sanžeev, G.D
1962 K voprosu ob otricanii v mongol’skich jazykach. Acta Orientalia Hungarica 15: 273–282.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej Anatolevič
1991 Altajskaja problema i proisxoždenie japanskogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauk.Google Scholar
Starostin, Sergej, Dybo, Anna & Mudrak, Oleg
2003 Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Unger, Jim Marshall
2000 Reconciling comparative and internal reconstruction: The case of Old Japanese /ti, ri, ni/. Language 76: 655–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vovin, Alexander
2001 Japanese, Korean and Tungusic. Evidence for genetic relationship from verbal morphology. In Altaic Affinities, Proceedings of the 40th meeting of the PIAC, Provo, Utah 1997, David B. Honey & David C. Wright (eds), 183–202. Bloomington IN: Indiana University, Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies.Google Scholar
2005 The end of the Altaic controversy. Central Asiatic Journal 49: 71–132.Google Scholar
2009 A Descriptive and Comparative Grammar of Western Old Japanese, Part 2: Adjectives, Verbs, Adverbs, Conjunctions, Particles, Postpositions [Languages of Asia 8]. Folkestone: Global Oriental.Google Scholar
Whitman, John Bradford
1985 The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Willis, David, Lucas, Christopher & Breibarth, Anne
2013 Comparing diachronies of negation. In The History of Negation in the Languages of Europe and the Mediterranean, 1: Case Studies [Oxford Studies in Diachronic and Historical Linguistics], David Willis, Christopher Lucas & Anne Breibarth (eds) 1–50. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Manzelli, Gianguido
2015. Mutual influences in negative patterns between Finno-Ugric and Turkic languages in the Volga-Kama area*. In Negation in Uralic Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 108], ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.