Article published in:Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 271–293
Enabling and allowing in Hebrew
A usage-based construction grammar account
Three-Argument Dative constructions in Hebrew include two sub constructions, each with a specific form-meaning correlation, a specific usage pattern, and a particular discursive context. Syntactically, the two sub-constructions differ in that the THEME argument can be either (i) a noun phrase, or (ii) an infinitival predicate. In particular, the verb natan ‘give’ represents a prototypical construal in both sub-constructions. That is, with a NP THEME argument the verb natan ‘give’ has its literal meaning. With an infinitival THEME argument, however, the verb has the meaning of ‘allow, enable.’ Analyzing corpus data of the Infinitival complement Construction (ii), I account for these uses of the verb natan ‘give’ in a Usage-Based Construction Grammar perspective (Bybee, 2010). Utilizing the exploratory statistics techniques of Multidimensional Scaling (Borg and Groenen, 2005), Multiple Correspondence Analysis (Greenacre, 2010), and Hierarchical Classification on Principal Components (Husson et al., 2011) on corpus data, I show that multiple factors play a role in structuring an Argument Structure Construction. Furthermore, based on the bottom-up statistical analysis I argue that the verb’s morphological paradigm is one of the main cues for interpreting the relevant event frame and Dative participant roles in Hebrew.
Published online: 14 January 2015
Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Tomasello, Michael
Borg, Ingwer & Groenen, Patrick J.F.
Bybee, Joan L.
Bybee, Joan L. & Eddington, David
Cox, Trevor F. & Cox, Michael A.A.
In progress. Mapping Hebrew Dative Constructions. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C.L.
2006 Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics.The Linguistic Review 23(3): 213–216. http://www.reference-global.com/doi/abs/10.1515/TLR.2006.007 DOI:
Goldberg, Adele E.
Goldberg, Adele E. & Jackendoff, Ray
Greenacre, Michael & Blasius, Jörg
Gries, Stefan Thomas
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
Husson, François, Lê, Sébastien & Pagès, Jérôme
Husson, Francois, Josse, Julie, Lê, Sébastien et al.
2013 FactoMineR: Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining with R, version 1.25 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=FactoMineR
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles J.
Nenadic, Oleg & Greenacre, Michael
2007 Correspondence Analysis in R, with two and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software 20(3): 1–13. http://www.jstatsoft.org
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
R Core Team
2013, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/