Article published in:
Causation, Permission, and Transfer: Argument realisation in GET, TAKE, PUT, GIVE and LET verbs
Edited by Brian Nolan, Gudrun Rawoens and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 167] 2015
► pp. 271293
References

References

Abbot-Smith, Kirsten & Tomasello, Michael
2006Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. The Linguistic Review 23(3): 275–290. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2008Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borg, Ingwer & Groenen, Patrick J.F.
2005Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications, 2nd edn. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 529–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Eddington, David
2006A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language 82(2): 323–355. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Trevor F. & Cox, Michael A.A.
2001Multidimensional Scaling, 2nd edn. Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dattner, Elitzur
In progress. Mapping Hebrew Dative Constructions. PhD dissertation, Tel Aviv University.
Diessel, Holger
2004The Acquisition of Complex Sentences. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary Catherine
1988Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of ‘let alone’. Language 64(4): 501–538. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Yu, Alan C.L.
2006Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics.The Linguistic Review 23(3): 213–216. http://​www​.reference​-global​.com​/doi​/abs​/10​.1515​/TLR​.2006​.007 DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, Dylan
2014Correspondence analysis. Exploring data and identifying patterns. In Corpus Methods in Cognitive Semantics. Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy [Human Cognitive Processing 43], Dylan Glynn & Justyna A. Robinson, 443–486. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2003Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(5): 219–224. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005aArgument realization: The role of constructions, lexical semantics and discourse factors. In Construction Grammars. Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions [Constructional Approaches to Language 3], Jan-Ola Östman & Mirjam Fried (eds), 17–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005bConstructions, lexical semantics, and the correspondence principle. In The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi 
Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. & Jackendoff, Ray
2004The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3): 532–568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, Michael
2010Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2nd edn. Boca Raton FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Greenacre, Michael & Blasius, Jörg
2006Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods. Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan Thomas
2009Quantitative Corpus Linguistics With R: A Practical Introduction. New York NY: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1980Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Husson, François, , Sébastien & Pagès, Jérôme
2011. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R. Boca Raton FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Husson, Francois, Josse, Julie, , Sébastien et al.
2013FactoMineR: Multivariate Exploratory Data Analysis and Data Mining with R, version 1.25 http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=FactoMineR
Kay, Paul
1997Words and the Grammar of Context. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles J.
1999Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The what’s X doing Y? construction. Language 75(1): 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2012Comparing constructicons: A usage-based analysis of the causative construction with doen in Netherlandic and Belgian Dutch. Constructions and Frames 4(1): 76–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nenadic, Oleg & Greenacre, Michael
2007Correspondence Analysis in R, with two and three-dimensional graphics: The ca package. Journal of Statistical Software 20(3): 1–13. http://​www​.jstatsoft​.orgGoogle Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2001Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45], Joan L. Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 137–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
2013, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://​www​.R​-project​.org/Google Scholar
Rencher, Alvin
2012Methods of Multivariate Analysis. Hoboken NJ: Wiley. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew B.
2006Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23(3): 247–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar