Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 1–32

Historical syntax

Problems, materials, methods, hypotheses

| University of Zurich
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.01vit
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. & Dixon, Robert M.W.
(eds) 2001 Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen
1977 On mechanisms by which languages become ergative. In Li (ed.), 317-364.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Quentin D. & Gray, Russell D.
2006 How old is the Indo-European language family? Illumination or more moths to the flame. In Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds), 91-109. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, Umberto
2013 Contact Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Anttila, Raimo
1977 Analogy. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter & Matras, Yaron
(eds) 2013 Contact Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baldi, Philip
(ed.) 1990 Linguistic Change and Reconstruction Methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2001 Case in Icelandic: A Synchronic, Diachronic and Comparative Approach. PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2012 Reconstructing syntax: Construction grammar and the comparative method. In Sign-Based Construction Grammar, Hans C. Boas & Ivan Sag (eds), 257-308. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat, Hernanz, Maria-Lluïsa, Picallo, Carmen & Roca, Francesc
2005 Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte
1995 The Emergence and Development of SVO Patterning in Latin and French: Diachronic and Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2000 Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belardi, Walter
2002 L'etimologia nella storia della cultura occidentale. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
Bertram, Georg
2011 Sprachphilosophie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette
2004 Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire
2013 The life, growth, and death of languages. In L’interface langage-cognition, Actes du 19e Congrès International des Linguistes, Genève, 22-27 juillet 2013, Stephen Anderson, Jacques Moeschler & Fabienne Reboul ( eds), 59-81. Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1925 Die Syntax des einfachen Satzes im Indogermanischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985 Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Formal universals as emergent phenomena: The origins of structure preservation. In Good (ed.), 108-121.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle
2001 What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113-161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Harris, Alice
2002 Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing ‘Myths and the prehistory of grammars’. Journal of Linguistics 38: 599-618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1977 The evolution of third person verb agreement in the Iroquoian languages. In Li (ed.), 317-364.Google Scholar
Crespo, Emilio & García Ramón, José Luis
(eds) 1997 Berthold Delbrück y la sintaxis indoeuropea hoy, Actas del Coloquio de la Indogermanische Gesellschaft; Madrid, 21-24 de septiembre de 1994. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Crisma, Paola & Longobardi, Giuseppe
(eds) 2009 Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, Bhattacharya, Tanmoy, Kleinschmidt, Dave, Smith, Eric & Jaeger, Florian
2011 Greenbergian universals, diachrony and statistical analyses. Linguistic Typology 15: 433-453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curd, Martib, Cover, Jan & Pincock, Christopher
(eds) 20132. Philosophy of Science. The Central Issues. New York NY: Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen
2004 The Growth and Maintenance of Linguistic Complexity [Studies in Language Companion Series 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold
1878 Die altindische Wortfolge aus dem Śatapathabrāhmaṇa dargestellt [Syntaktische Forschungen 3]. Halle: Buchhandlung des Weisenhauses.Google Scholar
1879 Die Grundlagen der griechischen Syntax [Syntaktische Forschungen 4]. Halle: Buchhandlung des Weisenhauses.Google Scholar
1888 Altindische Syntax [Syntaktische Forschungen 5]. Halle: Buchhandlung des Weisenhauses.Google Scholar
1893-1900 Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew & Stephens, Laurence
1999 Discontinuous Syntax. Hyperbaton in Greek. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
1997 The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dorian, Nancy
1993 Internally and externally motivated change in language contact settings: Doubts about dichotomy. In Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, Charles Jones (ed.), 131-155. London: LongmanGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Terrill, Angela, Reesink, Ger, Foley, Robert & Levinson, Stephen
2005 Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309: 2072–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Levinson, Stephen, Lindström, Eva, Reesink, Ger & Terrill, Angela
2008 Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: Methodological explorations applied in Island Melanesia. Language 84: 710-759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durie, Mark & Ross, Malcolm
(eds) 1996 The Comparative Method Reviewed. Regularity and Irregularity in Language Change. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Dyen, Isidore, Kruskal, Joseph & Black, Paul
1992 An Indoeuropean Classification: A Lexicostatistical Experiment [Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 82, Part 5]. Philadelphia PA: The American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Embleton, Sheila
1986 Statistics in Historical Linguistics. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Faarlund, Jan
1990 Syntactic Change: Towards a Theory of Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella & Goldbach, Maria
(eds) 2008 Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferraresi, Gisella & Lühr, Rosemarie
(eds) 2010 Diachronic Studies on Information Structure. Language Acquisition and Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1988 The mechanisms of ‘construction grammar’. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds), 35-55. Berkeley CA: BLS.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, Norde, Muriel & Perridon, Harry
(eds) 2004 Up and Down the Cline – The Nature of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 59]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fisiak, Jacek
(ed.) 1984 Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin
2003 An approach to semantic change. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 648-666. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Anthony
1995 Linguistic Reconstruction. An Introduction to Theory and Method. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew
2006 Convergence in the formation of Indo-European subgroups: Phylogeny and chronology. In Phylogenetic Methods and the Prehistory of Languages, Peter Forster & Colin Renfrew (eds), 139-151. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
2012 The historical syntax problem: Reanalysis and directionality. In Jonas, Whitman & Garrett (eds), 52-72.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2011 The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna & Hopper, Paul
(eds) 1998 The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gianollo, Chiara, Guardiano, Cristina & Longobardi, Giuseppe
2008 Three fundamental issues in parametric linguistics. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 109-142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Anna
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006 Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Good, Jeff
(ed.) 2008 Linguistic Universals and Language Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Russell & Atkinson, Quentin
2003 Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426: 435-439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob
1870-18982. Deutsche Grammatik. Göttingen: Dieterich.Google Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina & Longobardi, Giuseppe
2005 Parametric comparison and language taxonomy. In Batllori, Picallo & Roca (eds), 149-174.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
1993 The Language Builder. An Essay on the Human Signature in Linguistic Morphogenesis [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice
2008 On the explanation of typologically unusual structures. In Good (ed.), 54-76.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice & Campbell, Lyle
1995 Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrison, Shelly P.
2003 On the limits of the comparative method. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 213-243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartshorne, Charles & Weiss, Paul
(eds) 1931-1958 Peirce, Collected Papers. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John
2004 Complexity and Efficiency in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2003 Grammaticalization. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 575-601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2003 Contact-induced grammaticalization. Studies in Language 27: 529-572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 The Genesis of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Bubenik, Vit
2006 From Case to Adposition: The Development of Configurational Syntax in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 280]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton
1965 Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hymes, Dell
(ed.) 1974 Studies in the History of Linguistics. Traditions and paradigms. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard
2001 Beyond ‘pathways’ and ‘unidirectionality’: On the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 265-340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janda, Richard & Joseph, Brian
2003 Introduction: On language, change, and language change – Or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 1-180. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jeffers, Robert
1976 Syntactic change and syntactic reconstruction. In Current Progress in Historical Linguistics: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Historical Linguistics, William M. Christie, 1-15. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Jonas, Diane, Whitman, John & Garrett, Andrew
(eds) 2012 Grammatical Change. Origins, Natures, Outcomes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian
2001 Is there such a thing as ‘grammaticalization’? Language Sciences 23: 163-186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization. In Fischer, Norde & Perridon (eds), 45-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Multiple sources and multiple causes multiply explored. Studies in Language 37: 675-691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian & Janda, Richard
(eds) 2003 The Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, Joshua
2010 Etymology. In The Classical Tradition, Anthony Crafton, Glenn Most & Salvatore Settis (eds). Cambridge MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2008 Universals constrain change; Change results in typological generalizations. In Good (ed.), 23-53.Google Scholar
2012 Grammaticalization as optimization. In Jonas, Whitman & Garrett (eds), 15-51.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Kortmann, Bernd
1991 On the reanalysis of verbs as prepositions. In Prepositions, Gisa Rauh (ed.), 109-125. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1992 Categorial reanalysis: The case of deverbal preposition. Linguistics 30: 671-698.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1991 The pragmatics-semantics of grammaticalization revisited. In Traugott & Heine (eds), 189-218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Vezzosi, Letizia
2004 The role of predicate meaning in the development of reflexivity. In What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components, Walter Bisang, Nikolaus Himmelmann & Björn Wiemer (eds), 213–244. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
2001 Syntactic change. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 699-730. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1945 La nature des procès dits analogiques. Acta Linguistica 5: 15-37.Google Scholar
1964 The Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1994 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. I: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. II: Social Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1977 Syntactic reanalysis. In Li (ed.), 57-140.Google Scholar
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
LaPolla, Randy J.
2009 Causes and effects of substratum, superstratum and adstratum influence, with reference to Tibeto-Burman languages. Senri Ethnological Studies 75: 227-237.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger
1997 Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Remarks on (uni)directionality. In Pathways of Change. Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 207-227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1982 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. A Programmatic Sketch, Vol. 1 [Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts 48]. Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
2002 Thoughts on Grammaticalization, revised version [Arbeitspapiere des Seminars für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Erfurt 9]. Erfurt: University of Erfurt.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred
1974 Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1976 From topic to subject in Indo-European. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 447-456. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000 Pre-Indo-European [Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series 41]. Washington DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2009 Sprachphilosophie. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Charles N.
(ed.) 1977 Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1991 How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002a Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002b Myths and the prehistory of grammar. Journal of Linguistics 38: 619-626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002c More myths. Journal of Linguistics 38: 113-136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 How New Languages Emerge. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe
2003 On parameters and parameter theory. In Syntaxtheorien: Modelle, Methoden, Motive, Elisabeth Stark & Ulrich Wandrusza (eds), 273-290. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe & Guardiano, Cristina
2009 Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness. Lingua 119: 1679-1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Seoane, Elena
(eds) 2008 Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives [Typological Studies in Language 76]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2010 The rise (and possible downfall) of configurationality. In A Companion to Historical Linguistics, Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubnik (eds), 212-229. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mańczak, Witold
1958 Tendences générales des changements analogiques, Lingua 7: 298-325; 387-420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980 Laws of analogy. In Historical Morphology, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 283-288. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matić, Dejan, van Gijn, Rick, Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2014 Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences: An overview. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language 105], Rick van Gijn, Jeremy Hammond, Dejan Matić, Saskia van Putten & Ana Vilacy Galucio (eds), 1-44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron
2009 Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McMahon, April & McMahon, Robert
2005 Language Classification by Numbers. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1921 Linguistic historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
1925 La méthode comparative en linguistique historique. Oslo: Aschehoug & Co.Google Scholar
1931 Caractère secondaire du type thématique indo-européen. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 32: 194-203.Google Scholar
von Mengden, Ferdinand
2008 Reconstructing complex structures: A typological perspective. In Ferraresi & Goldbach (eds), 97-119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti, Sinnemäki, Kaius & Karlsson, Fred
(eds) 2008 Language Complexity: Typology, Contact, Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 94]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miklosich, Franz
1874 Vergleichende Syntax der slavischen Sprachen. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1984 Levels of linguistic structure and the rate of change. In Fisiak (ed.), 301-332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakhleh, Luay, Ringe, Donald & Warnow, Tandy
2005 Perfect phylogenetic networks: A new methodology for reconstructing the evolutionary history of natural languages. Language 81: 382–420. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newen, Albert & Schrenk, Markus
2008 Einführung in die Sprachphilosophie. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick
2001 Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences 23: 187-229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna
1992 Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009 Degrammaticalization. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okasha, Samir
2002 Philosophy of Science. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann
19205. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
2003 Variationist approaches to syntactic change. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 509-528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Thomason, Sarah
2008 How much syntactic reconstruction is possible? In Ferraresi & Goldbach (eds), 27-72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polomé, Edgar & Winter, Werner
(eds) 1992 Reconstructing Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Puhvel, Jaan
1960 The present state of laryngeal studies. In Evidence for Laryngals, Werner Winter (ed.), 1-12. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rankin, Robert
2003 The comparative method. In Joseph & Janda (eds), 183-212. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, McMahon, April & Trask, Robert
(eds) 2000 Time Depth in Historical Linguistics. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Rexovà, Katerina, Frynta, Daniel & Zrzavý, Jan
2003 Cladistic analysis of languages: The Indo-European classification based on lexico-statistical data. Cladistics 19: 120–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald, Warnow, Tandy & Taylor, Ann
2002 Indo-European and computational cladistics. Transactions of the Philological Society 100: 59–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ringe, Donald & Eska, Joseph
2013 Historical Linguistics. Towards a Twenty-first Century Reintegration. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne
1981 The Transparency Principle: What it is and why it doesn’t work. Lingua 55: 277-300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard
1950 Griechische Grammatik, Band 2: Syntax und syntaktische Stilistik. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Sinnemäki, Kaius
2011 Language Universals and Linguistic Complexity: Three Case Studies in Core Argument Marking. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.
Speyer, Augustin
2007 Die Bedeutung der Centering Theory für Fragen der Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 83-115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speyer, Jacob
1886 Sanskrit Syntax. Leiden.Google Scholar
1896 Vedische und Sanskrit Syntax. Strassburg: Trübner. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stathi, Ekaterina, Gehweiler, Elke & König, Ekkehard
(eds) 2010 Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, Morris
1951 Diffusional cumulation and archaic residue as historical explanations. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 7: 1-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah
2001 Language Contact: An Introduction. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah & Kaufmann, Terrence
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Alan
1977 Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Li (ed.), 141-180.Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael
2004 What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Studies in Language 28: 642–645 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd
(eds) 1991 Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vols. I-II [Typological Studies in Language 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2011 Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vendryes, Joseph
1955 Sur l’étymologie croisé. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 51: 1-8.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1997 The emergence of the D-system in Romance. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 149-169. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2015 Variation und Wandel in der Syntax der alten indogermanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1926-1928 Vorlesungen über Syntax. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2013 The correspondence problem in syntactic reconstruction, Diachronica 30: 95–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1964 Preliminaries to the reconstruction of Indo-European sentence structure. In Proceedings of the IX International Congress of Linguists, Horace Lunt (ed.), 1035-1045. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1976 Towards Proto-Indo-European syntax. Problems and pseudo-problems. In Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax, April 22, 1976, Sanford Steever, Carol Walker & Salikoko S. Mufwene (eds), 305-326. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1995 How to Kill a Dragon. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001 An Indo-European linguistic area and its characteristics: Ancient Anatolia. Areal diffusion as a challenge to the Comparative Method? In Aikhenvald & Dixon (eds). 44-63.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1977 Sprachen in Kontakt. Ergebnisse und Probleme der Zweisprachigkeitsforschung. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Winter, Werner
1984 Reconstructional comparative linguistics and the reconstruction of the syntax of undocumented stages in the development of languages and language families. In Fisiak (ed.), 613-625. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipser, Katharina
2012 Spracherwerb und syntaktischer Wandel. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Carling, Gerd & Chundra Cathcart
2021. Evolutionary dynamics of Indo-European alignment patterns. Diachronica 38:3 ► pp. 358 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.