Article published in:
Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 3360


Anderson, Stephen R. & Keenan, Edward L.
1985Deixis. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III, Timothy Shopen (ed.). Cambridge: CUPGoogle Scholar
Brandner, Ellen & Bräuning, Iris
2013Relative wo in Alemannic: Only a complementizer? Linguistische Berichte 234: 131-169.Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & van Alphen, Ingrid
(eds) 2012Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and Cross-disciplinary Perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934/1982Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache [Ullstein Taschenbuch 1159]. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger
1999Demonstratives. Form, Functions and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 42]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4): 463-489. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Bühler’s two-field theory of pointing and naming and the deictic origins of grammatical morphemes. In Grammaticalization and Language Change. New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 37-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2003Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1): 61-112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad
1987So – Überlegungen zum Verhältnis sprachlicher Formen und sprachlichen Handelns, allgemein und an einem widerspenstigen Beispiel. In Sprache und Pragmatik, Inger Rosengren (ed.). Malmö: Almquist und Wiksel.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2009Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, Tom
2008Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harbert, Wayne
2007The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda
1998Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277-334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2012Equative constructions in a world-wide perspective. Paper given at the conference Expressions of Similarity from an Africanist and Typological Perspective, Villejuif, July.
Hawkins, John
2004Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The Genesis of Grammar. A Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
1997Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hole, Daniel & Klumpp, Gerson
2000Definite type and indefinite token: The article son in Colloquial German. Linguistische Berichte 182: 231-244.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln, Linguistische Berichte 224: 467-493.Google Scholar
2012So manag so her bitharf: So als Vergleichspartikel und –korrelat in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
König, Ekkehard
2012Le rôle des déictiques de la manière dans le cadre d’une typologie de la deixis. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, CVII. 11-42.Google Scholar
2013The deictic identification of similarity. In Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Krasnoukhova, Olga
2012The Noun Phrase in the Languages of South America. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander B.
2012On some properties of sentential arguments in Russian. Voprosy jazykoznanija 5.Google Scholar
Schleburg, Florian
2002Altenglisch ‘swa’. Syntax und Semantik einer polyfunktionalen Partikel. Heiselberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
2001Vergleiche und Vergleichen. Eine Studie zu Form und Funktion der Vergleichsstrukturen im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, Michael, Carpenter, Malinda & Liszkowski, Ulf
2007A new look at infant pointing. Child Development 78: 705-722. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott Closs, Elizabeth & König, Ekkehard
1991The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 189-216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svarvik, Jan
1985A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Umbach, Carla
2007The role of so in equative comparison. Paper given at the Syntax and Semantics Conference CSSP, Paris.
2008Facts as proof. Paper given at the Workshop on Reference to Abstract Objects in Natural Language, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Umbach, Carla & Ebert, Cornelia
2009German demonstrative so – intensifying and hedging effects. In Sprache & Datenverarbeitung 33: 1-2, Henk Zeevat & Hans-Christian Schmitz (eds), 153-168.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3  pp. 403 ff. Crossref logo
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2022.  In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358],  pp. 310 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.