Manner deixis as source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages
Ekkehard König | Free University of Berlin & University of Freiburg
Recent typological and areal studies of demonstratives, such as Himmelmann (1997), Diessel 1999, 2006), Dixon (2003), Güldemann (2008) and Krasnoukhova (2012), have contributed extensively to our knowledge of possible deictic systems. What is notably absent from these descriptions, however, are demonstratives expressing the semantic dimensions MANNER, QUALITY and DEGREE in addition to their deictic components. As a result of this neglect, the relevant demonstratives (e.g. German so, Ital. cosi, Finn. näin, noin, niin, Jap. koo, soo, aa) are frequently analyzed only in an atomistic fashion as isolated particles, without relating them to existing systematic analyses of demonstratives. The first goal of this cross-linguistic study is to provide a general analysis of such demonstratives, which includes their morphological properties (simplex or composite), their syntactic behavior as members of various categories and their semantic properties of combining two dimensions of meaning, viz. a deictic dimension (proximal, medial, distal, visible, etc.) and a content dimension in terms of the ontological categories ‘manner’, ‘quality’ and ‘degree’. In the second and major part of this paper I will discuss another neglected aspect of the relevant demonstratives, viz. their role in processes of grammaticalization and thus in the genesis and development of various grammatical categories. Starting out from the well-known extensions from exophoric to anaphoric and cataphoric, these demonstratives also develop into propositional anaphors, comparative markers, adverbial connectives, as well as quotative, exclamative and approximative markers in a wide variety of languages.
Ehlich, Konrad. 1987. So – Überlegungen zum Verhältnis sprachlicher Formen und sprachlichen Handelns, allgemein und an einem widerspenstigen Beispiel. In Sprache und Pragmatik, Inger Rosengren (ed.). Malmö: Almquist und Wiksel.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2009. Cyclical Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 146]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The Linguistic Cycle: Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP.
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Harbert, Wayne. 2007. The Germanic Languages. Cambridge: CUP.
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda. 1998. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe,Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 277-334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Haspelmath, Martin. 2012. Equative constructions in a world-wide perspective. Paper given at the conference Expressions of Similarity from an Africanist and Typological Perspective, Villejuif, July.
Hawkins, John. 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: OUP.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: OUP.
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2007. The Genesis of Grammar. A Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 1997. Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase: Zur Emergenz syntaktischer Struktur. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Hole, Daniel & Klumpp, Gerson. 2000. Definite type and indefinite token: The article son in Colloquial German. Linguistische Berichte 182: 231-244.
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln, Linguistische Berichte 224: 467-493.
Jäger, Agnes. 2012. So manag so her bitharf: So als Vergleichspartikel und –korrelat in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
König, Ekkehard. 2012. Le rôle des déictiques de la manière dans le cadre d’une typologie de la deixis. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris, CVII. 11-42.
König, Ekkehard. 2013. The deictic identification of similarity. In Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Perspective, Yvonne Treis & Martine Vanhove (eds) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Krasnoukhova, Olga. 2012. The Noun Phrase in the Languages of South America. Utrecht: LOT.
Letuchiy, Alexander B. 2012. On some properties of sentential arguments in Russian. Voprosy jazykoznanija 5.
Schleburg, Florian. 2002. Altenglisch ‘swa’. Syntax und Semantik einer polyfunktionalen Partikel. Heiselberg: Carl Winter.
Thurmair, Maria. 2001. Vergleiche und Vergleichen. Eine Studie zu Form und Funktion der Vergleichsstrukturen im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Tomasello, Michael, Carpenter, Malinda & Liszkowski, Ulf. 2007. A new look at infant pointing. Child Development 78: 705-722.
Traugott Closs, Elizabeth & König, Ekkehard. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 189-216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svarvik, Jan. 1985. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
Umbach, Carla. 2007. The role of so in equative comparison. Paper given at the Syntax and Semantics Conference CSSP, Paris.
Umbach, Carla. 2008. Facts as proof. Paper given at the Workshop on Reference to Abstract Objects in Natural Language, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Umbach, Carla & Ebert, Cornelia. 2009. German demonstrative so – intensifying and hedging effects. In Sprache & Datenverarbeitung 33: 1-2, Henk Zeevat & Hans-Christian Schmitz (eds), 153-168.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Gentens, Caroline & Kasper Boye
2024. Introduction: the development of manner expressions into complementizers or quotatives. Linguistics 62:3 ► pp. 531 ff.
Guz, Wojciech
2024. Quotative uses of Polish similative demonstratives. Linguistics 62:3 ► pp. 541 ff.
Jaradat, Abdulazeez
2024. From nominal source to demonstrative: a case of grammaticalization in Standard Arabic. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 77:3 ► pp. 315 ff.
Krajewska, Dorota
2024. The diachrony of the Basque marker bait-: from a manner expression to subordinator. Linguistics 62:3 ► pp. 653 ff.
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Guérin, Valérie
2015. Demonstrative verbs: A typology of verbal manner deixis. Linguistic Typology 19:2 ► pp. 141 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.