Article published in:Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 33–60
Manner deixis as source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages
Recent typological and areal studies of demonstratives, such as Himmelmann (1997), Diessel 1999, 2006), Dixon (2003), Güldemann (2008) and Krasnoukhova (2012), have contributed extensively to our knowledge of possible deictic systems. What is notably absent from these descriptions, however, are demonstratives expressing the semantic dimensions MANNER, QUALITY and DEGREE in addition to their deictic components. As a result of this neglect, the relevant demonstratives (e.g. German so, Ital. cosi, Finn. näin, noin, niin, Jap. koo, soo, aa) are frequently analyzed only in an atomistic fashion as isolated particles, without relating them to existing systematic analyses of demonstratives. The first goal of this cross-linguistic study is to provide a general analysis of such demonstratives, which includes their morphological properties (simplex or composite), their syntactic behavior as members of various categories and their semantic properties of combining two dimensions of meaning, viz. a deictic dimension (proximal, medial, distal, visible, etc.) and a content dimension in terms of the ontological categories ‘manner’, ‘quality’ and ‘degree’. In the second and major part of this paper I will discuss another neglected aspect of the relevant demonstratives, viz. their role in processes of grammaticalization and thus in the genesis and development of various grammatical categories. Starting out from the well-known extensions from exophoric to anaphoric and cataphoric, these demonstratives also develop into propositional anaphors, comparative markers, adverbial connectives, as well as quotative, exclamative and approximative markers in a wide variety of languages.
Keywords: adverbial connectives, comparative markers, degree, demonstratives, grammaticalization, manner, quality
Published online: 29 April 2015
Anderson, Stephen R. & Keenan, Edward L
Brandner, Ellen & Bräuning, Iris
Buchstaller, Isabelle & van Alphen, Ingrid
2012 Bühler’s two-field theory of pointing and naming and the deictic origins of grammatical morphemes. In Grammaticalization and Language Change. New Reflections [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 37-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dixon, Robert M.W
van Gelderen, Elly
Haspelmath, Martin & Buchholz, Oda
2012 Equative constructions in a world-wide perspective. Paper given at the conference Expressions of Similarity from an Africanist and Typological Perspective, Villejuif, July.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P
Hole, Daniel & Klumpp, Gerson
2012 So manag so her bitharf: So als Vergleichspartikel und –korrelat in der Geschichte des Deutschen. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
Letuchiy, Alexander B
Tomasello, Michael, Carpenter, Malinda & Liszkowski, Ulf
Traugott Closs, Elizabeth & König, Ekkehard
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svarvik, Jan
2007 The role of so in equative comparison. Paper given at the Syntax and Semantics Conference CSSP, Paris.
2008 Facts as proof. Paper given at the Workshop on Reference to Abstract Objects in Natural Language, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Cited by 2 other publications
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.