Article published in:
Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 251270
References

References

Allan, Rutger J.
2007Sense and sentence complexity. Sentence structure, sentence connection, and tense-aspect as indicators of narrative mode in Thucydides' Histories . In The Language of Literature. Linguistic Approaches to Classical Texts, Rutger J. Allan, Michael Buijs, Irene. J.F. de Jong & Albert Rijksbaron (eds), 93-121. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariel, Mira
2010Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J.
1997Poetry in Speech: Orality and Homeric Discourse. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar
2012Of Ens ’n’ Ands: Observations on the phonetic make-up of a coordinator and its uses in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech 55: 35-56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bäumlein, Wilhelm
1861Untersuchungen über griechische Partikeln. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Bloch, Alfred
1955Was bedeuted das “epische” ΤΕ? Museum Helveticum 12: 145-153.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna, Drummen Annemieke, De Kreij, Mark
Forthcoming. Particles in Ancient Greek Discourse. Pragmatic studies of particle use across genres. Washington DC & Cambridge, MA: Center for Hellenic Studies & Harvard University Press.
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George
1983Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper III, Guy L.
1998Attic Greek Prose Syntax, Vol. 2. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Denniston, John D.
1950The Greek Particles, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Devarius, Matthaeus
1588Liber de graecae linguae particulis. Rome: F. Zannetti.Google Scholar
Dover, Kenneth J.
1997The Evolution of Greek Prose Style. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Van Erp Taalman Kip, A. Maria
2009 Kai mên, kai dê and êdê in tragedy and comedy. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Gerry C. Wakker & Stephanie J. Bakker (eds), 111-133. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gonda, Jan
1954The history and original function of the Indo-European particle *kwe, especially in Greek and Latin. Mnemosyne 4: 177-214 and 265-296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grégoire, Antoine
1930Notes sur la place occupée par les particules γε and δέ dans la versification homérique. Serta Leodiensia 44: 154-176.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41-58. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Griffith, Mark
(ed.) 1999Sophocles: Antigone. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hajnal, Ivo
2004 e-ke-qe oder e-ke? – Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit in den mykenischen Palastarchiven. In Analecta Homini Universalis Dicata. Arbeiten zur Indogermanistik, Linguistik, Philologie, Politik, Musik und Dichtung. Festschrift für Oswald Panagl zum 65. Geburtstag, Thomas Krisch, Thomas Lindner & Ulrich Müller (eds), 233-251. Stuttgart: Hans-Dieter Heinz.Google Scholar
Hammer, Bruno
1904De τε [te] particulae usu Herodoteo, Thucydideo, Xenophonteo. Leipzig: Noske.Google Scholar
Hammond, Martin
2009Thucydides. The Peloponnesian War. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey
(ed.) 2000Aristophanes: Birds, Lysistrata, Women at the Thesmophoria. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hilgard, Alfred
1901Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam. Grammatici Graceci 1.3. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A. & Melchert, Craig H.
2008A Grammar of the Hittite language. Winona Lake IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Hoogeveen, Hendrick
1769Doctrina particularum linguae graecae. Leiden.Google Scholar
Humbert, Jean
1960Syntaxe grecque, 3rd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Klein, Jared. S.
1992Some Indo-European systems of conjunction: Rigveda, Old Persian, Homer. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 1-51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1971If’s, and’s, and but’s about conjunctions. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles. J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langendoen (eds), 114-49. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Lattimore, Richard
1967The Odyssey of Homer. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1988The grammaticization of coordination. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 331-359. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, Bruce. R.
1972Doublets. Notes on Translation 43: 3-34.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Eugene
1938Aristophanes. Women at the Thesmophoria. New York NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Orlandini, Anna & Poccetti, Paolo
2007L’expression de la coordination connective et copulative en latin et dans les langues de l’Italie ancienne, In Actes du XIII Colloque International de Linguistique Latin, Gérald Prunelle (ed.), 129-142. Liège: Université de Liège.Google Scholar
Race, William H.
(ed.) 1997Pindar: Nemean Odes, Isthmian Odes, Fragments. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rijksbaron, Albert
1997Adverb or connector? The case of kai ... de . In New Approaches to Greek Particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 187-208. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Ruijgh, Cornelis J.
1971Autour de ‘TE epique’: Études sur la syntaxe grecque. Amsterdam: Hakkert.Google Scholar
Segal, Erwin M., Duchan, Judith F. & Scott, Paula J.
1991The role of interclausal connectives in narrative structuring: Evidence from adults' interpretations of simple stories. Discourse Processes 14: 27-54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmerling, Susan F.
1975Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 211-231. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W.
1920Greek Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stephens, Edward
1837A Treatise On The Greek Expletive Particles. Oxford: Talboys.Google Scholar
Stuart Jones, Henry & Powell, John E.
1942Thucydidis historiae, 2 Vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre & Wouters, Alfons
2002Grammatical Theory and Philosophy of Language in Antiquity. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Titrud, Kermit
1991The overlooked καί [kai] in the Greek New Testament. Notes on Translation 5: 1-28.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth
1986On the origins of “and” and “but” connectives in English. Studies in Language 10: 137-150. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trenkner, Sophie
1960Le style καί [kaí] dans le récit attique oral. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Vigerus, Franciscus
1834[originally published in 1627]. De praecipuis graecae dictionis idiotismis liber cum animdsversionibus H. Hoogevenii, et I.c. Zeunii. Ed. et annotationes addidit G. Hermannus, 4th edn. Leipzig: Sumtibus Librariae Hahnianae.Google Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2006AND in the Early Indo-European languages. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 91: 129-165.Google Scholar
2008The meanings of coordination in the early Indo-European languages. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 24: 35-64.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard
2005Co-compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wentzel, Eduard
1847Über den Gebrauch der Part. τε [te] bei Homer. Glogau: Flemming.Google Scholar