Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 271–290

What role for inscriptions in the study of syntax and syntactic change in the old Indo-European languages?

The pros and cons of an integration of epigraphic corpora

| University of Zurich and University of Grenoble)*
It happens that scholars dealing with syntactic problems (especially of a theoretical nature) tend to dismiss inscriptional records of ancient I.-E. languages as being “not useful” or “too difficult to investigate”. In this paper, I will try firstly to understand where this attitude towards inscriptions originates from. Secondly, I will present some case-studies useful to shed light on the specific characteristics of inscriptions, which are not only texts but also concrete objects, and I will explore the pros and cons of the integration of epigraphic texts in the study of syntactic problems in the case of ancient languages. Finally, I will provide some reflections on the fact that scholars who would like to use inscriptions in their studies still do not have suitable digital tools at their disposal.**
Keywords: Ancient Greek, epigraphic corpora, Latin, Ogham-Irish, syntax
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.11del
References

Editions

CEG: Carmina Epigraphica Graeca
1983-1989 P.A. Hansen. Vol. I (1983) Vol. II (1989) Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chandler, Richard
1774 Inscriptiones antiquae pleraeque nondum editae in Asia Minori et Graecia. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
CIL: Corpus inscriptionum Latinarum
Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
CLE: Carmina Latina Epigraphica
. Franz Buecheler 1895-1897 Vol. I (1895) Vol. II (1897) Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
IG: Inscriptiones Graecae
Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
IGASMG I: Renato Arena
19962. Iscrizioni greche arcaiche di Sicilia e Magna Grecia. I. Iscrizioni di Megara Iblea e Selinunte. Pisa: Nistri Lischi.Google Scholar
IGLSyr I: Inscriptions grecques et latines de la Syrie, I. Commagène et Cyrrhestique
. Louis Jalabert - René Mouterde 1929 Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
ILS: Inscriptiones Latinae selectae
. Hermann Dessau 1892-1916 Berlin.Google Scholar
CalderIII, William M.
1963 The Inscription from Temple G at Selinous [Greek, Roman and Byzantine Monographs 4]. London and Beccles: Duke University.Google Scholar
Macalister, R.A.S.
1945-1949 Corpus inscriptionum insularum Celticarum. 2 vols. Vol. I (1945) Vol. II (1949) Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Res gestae divi Augusti. Text, translation, and commentary
2009 Alison E. Cooley. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
SEG: Supplementum epigraphicum Graecum
Leiden: Brill.

Electronic Databases

Epigraphik-Datenbank Clauss / Slaby. Manfred Clauss
[URL]
Searchable Greek Inscriptions. A Scholarly Tool in Progress
. Los Altos: The Packard Humanities Centre. [URL]
CIL: Corpus inscriptionum Latinarum
Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften. [URL]
The Ancient Greek and Latin Dependency Treebank
. Perseus. [URL]

Secondary Literature

Adams, James N.
2003 Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Social Variation and the Latin Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alföldy, Géza
1989 Epigraphische Notizen aus Italien III. Inschriften aus Nursia (Norcia). Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 77: 155-180.Google Scholar
Babeu, Alison
2011 ‘Rome Wasn’t Digitized in a Day’: Building a Cyberinfrastructure for Digital Classics. Washington DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.Google Scholar
Bile, Monique
1988 Le dialecte crétois ancien, Étude de la langue des inscriptions, recueil des inscriptions postérieures aux IC, Paris: Geuthner.Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1955 The Greek Dialects. London: Bristol Classical (reprint 2001).Google Scholar
Clackson, James & Horrocks, Geoffrey
2007 The Blackwell History of the Latin Language. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Denizot, Camille
2011 Donner des ordres en grec ancien. Étude linguistique des forms de l’injonction[Cahiers de l’ERIAC 3, Fonctionnements linguistiques]. Mont-Saint-Aignan: Publication des universities de Rouen et du Havre.Google Scholar
Disterheft, Dorothy & Viti, Carlotta
2013[2010] Subordination. In Bloomsbury Companion to Historical Linguistics [Bloomsbury Companions], Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds), 230-249. London: BloomsburyGoogle Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2013 Syntactic change. In Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds), 365-388. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Fry, Carole
2012 (Review of) Ari Saastamoinen: The phraseology of Latin building inscriptions in Roman North Africa. Commentationes humanarum litterarum 127. Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters, Helsinki 2010, 646 p. Museum Helveticum 69: 231-232.Google Scholar
García Ramón, José Luis
2001 Impératif et infinitif pro impératif dans les textes grecs dialectaux: les Lois de Gortyne. Verbum 23(3): 341-360.Google Scholar
Hodot, René
1990 Le dialecte éolien d’Asie, la langue des inscriptions, VIIe s. a. C.-IVe s. p.C. Paris: Recherches sur les civilisations.Google Scholar
Horrocks, Geoffrey
2010 Syntax: From Classical Greek to the Koine. In A History of Ancient Greek: From the Beginnings to Late Antiquity, Anastasios-Phoivos Christidis, Maria Arapopoulou & Maria Chriti (eds), 618-631. Cambridge: CUP. Originally published in Greek, 2001.Google Scholar
20102. Greek: A History of the Language and its speakers. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Latin syntax. In A Companion to the Latin Language, James Clackson (ed.). Chichester : Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karvounis, Christos
20082 [2008] Aussprache und Phonologie im Altgriechischen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Kruschwitz, Peter
2000 Die sprachlichen Anomalien der Werbeinschrift CIL X 7296. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 130: 239-240.Google Scholar
2004 Römische Inschriften und Wackernagels Gesetz. Untersuchungen zur Syntax epigraphischer Texte aus republikanischer Zeit [Schriften der Philosophisch‑historischen Klasse der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, Band 31]. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Meiser, Gerhard
20103. Historische Laut und Formenlehre der lateinischen Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Minon, Sophie
2007 Les inscriptions éléennes dialectales (VIe-IIe s. av. J. C.), I Textes, II Grammaire et vocabulaire institutionnel. Genève: Droz.Google Scholar
2009 La stèle diglosse de Sigée en Troade (IG I3 1508, ca 550 a. C.). In Traduire, transposer, transmettre dans l'Antiquité gréco‑romaine [Textes, Images et Monuments de l’Antiquité au haut Moyen âge 9], Bernard Bortolussi, Madeleine Keller, Sophie Minon & Lyliane Sznajder (eds), 91-105. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Ringe, Don & Eska, Joseph F.
2013 Historical Linguistics. Towards a Twenty-First Century Reintegration. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ernest Stewart & Gardner, Ernest Arthur
1887-1905 An Introduction to Greek Epigraphy, Part I: The Archaic Inscriptions and the Greek Alphabet (1887). Part II: The Inscriptions of Attica 1905). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Saastamoinen, Ari
2010 The Phraseology of Latin Building Inscriptions in Roman North Africa [Commentationes humanarum litterarum 127]. Helsinki: Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.Google Scholar
Schick, Carla
1955A Appunti per una storia della prosa greca, I: La lingua delle iscrizioni. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica N. S. 33(1): 361-390.Google Scholar
1955B Una questione di sintassi storica. L’infinito imperativale e i varî modi di esprimere il commando in greco arcaico. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei. Rediconti. Anno 352. Classe di Scienze Morali, Storiche e Filologiche 10: 410-421.Google Scholar
Schwyzer, Eduard, et al.
1939-1971 Griechische Grammatik, 4 vols. München: Beck.Google Scholar
Threatte, Leslie
1980-1996 A Grammar of Attic Inscriptions. Phonology. Vol. I (1980), Morphology. Vol. II (1996) Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Treherne, George G.T.
1920 Eglwys Cymmin Epitaphs. Cartmarthen: Spurrell & Son.Google Scholar
Tribulato, Olga
2011 The stone-cutter’s bilingual inscription from Palermo (IG XIV 297 = CIL X 7296): A new interpretation. Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 177: 131-140.Google Scholar
2012  Siculi bilingues? Latin in the inscriptions of Early Roman Sicily. In Language and Linguistic Contact in Ancient Sicily [Cambridge Classical Studies], Olga Tribulato (ed.), 291-325. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Emde Boas, Evert & Huitink, Luuk
2010 Syntax. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), 134-150. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vatri, Alessandro
2013 Dead language processing: Can we build a corpus of natural classical Greek. Paper given at the HiCor workshop, Faculty of History, University of Oxford, 1 March.
Wachter, Rudolf
2010 Inscriptions. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), 47-61. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waldis, Joseph
1920 Sprache und Stil der großen griechischen Inschrift vom Nemrud-Dagh in Kommagene (Nordsyrien). Ein Beitrag zur Koine-Forschung. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Willets, Ronald F.
1967 The law code of Gortyn. Berlin: Göschen’sche Verlagshandlung. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, Sabine
1994 Die Sprache der Altirischen Ogam-Inschriften [Historische Sprachforschung, Ergänzungsheft 36]. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.Google Scholar