Cover not available
Part of
Perspectives on Historical Syntax
Edited by Carlotta Viti
[Studies in Language Companion Series 169] 2015
► pp. 293–316

The Gulf of Guinea creoles

A case-study of syntactic reconstruction

| University of Lisbon
This paper argues that creole languages do not face some of the typical problems that have been discussed with respect to syntactic reconstruction of older languages. Creoles often belong to young language families and are therefore expected to show a significant amount of syntactic identity among sister languages. Other factors, such as their isolating typology and geographical isolation, may be additional advantages in the success of syntactic reconstruction. This hypothesis is tested on the four Portuguese-related Gulf of Guinea creoles, where a high degree of identity and the use of other processes, such as directionality, prove to provide good insights into the syntactic features of the proto-language.
Keywords: creolization, directionality, Gulf of Guinea creoles, reconstruction, syntax
Published online: 29 April 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.169.12hag
References (65)
References
Adams, James N. 2007. The Regional Diversification of Latin, 200 BC–AD 600. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexandre, Nélia & Hagemeijer, Tjerk. 2007. Bare nouns and the nominal domain in Santome. In Noun Phrases in Creole Languages: A Multi-faceted Approach [Creole Language Library 31], Marlyse Baptista & Jacqueline Guéron (eds), 37-59. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arends, Jacques. 1995. Demographic factors in the formation of Sranan. In The Early Stages of Creolization [Creole Language Library 13], Jacques Arends (ed.), 233. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bakker, Peter, Daval-Markussen, Aymeric, Parkvall, Mikael & Plag, Ingo. 2011. Creoles are typologically distinct from non-creoles. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 5-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickerton, Derek.1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma.Google Scholar
.1984. The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruyn, Adrienne. 1995. Grammaticalization in Creoles: The Development of Determiners and Relative Clauses in Sranan. Amsterdam: IFOTT.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Arlindo. 2008. Tráfico de escravos e conflitualidade: O arquipelágo de São Tome e Príncipe e o reino do Congo durante o século XVI. Ciências & Letras 44: 55-76.Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle. & Harris, Alice C. 2002. Syntactic reconstruction and demythologizing ‘Myths and the prehistory of grammars’. Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 599-618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Hugo C. 2009. The Indo-Portuguese Language of Diu. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Chaudenson, Robert. 1992. Des îles, des Hommes, des Langues. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Clements, Joseph Clancy. 1996. The Genesis of a Language. The Formation and Development of Korlai Portuguese [Creole Language Library 16]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, Michel. 1999. Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony and Development. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Language acquisition in creolization and, thus, language change: Some Cartesian-Uniformitarian boundary conditions. Language and Linguistics Compass 3-4: 888-971. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit. 2001. Areal diffusion versus genetic inheritance: An African perspective. In Areal Diffusion and Genetic Inheritance, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 358-392. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Luiz I. 1979. The Creole of São Tomé. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. Portuguese creoles of West Africa and Asia. In Pidgins and Creole Languages: Essays in Memory of John E. Reinecke, Glen Gilbert (ed.), 337-60. Honolulu HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
de Granda, German. 1985. El ‘vocabulario fundamental’ del criollo portugués de Annobón. Rasgos caracterizadores. InEstudios de Lingüistica Afro-romanica, German de Granda, 157-196. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom. 2008. The macro-Sudan belt: Towards identifying a linguistic area in northern sub-Saharan African. In A Linguistic Geography of Africa, Bernd Heine & Derek Nurse (eds), 151-185. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Güldemann, Tom & Hagemeijer, Tjerk. 2006. Negation in the Gulf of Guinea creoles: Typological and historical perspectives, talk delivered at Encontro Anual da Associação de Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa e Espanhola, Coimbra.Google Scholar
Günther, Wilfried. 1973. Das Portugiesische Kreolisch der ilha do Príncipe. Marburg an der Lahn: Marburger Studien zur Afrika- und Asienkunde.Google Scholar
Hagemeijer, Tjerk 2001. Semi-lexicality and underspecification in serial verb constructions. In Semi-lexical Categories, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 415-451. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Clause Structure in Santome. PhD dissertation, Universidade de Lisboa.
. 2009a. Initial vowel agglutination in the Gulf of Guinea creoles. In Complex Processes in New Languages [Creole Language Library 35], Enoch Aboh & Norval Smith (eds), 29-50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Aspects of discontinuous negation in Santome. In Negation Patterns in West African Languages and Beyond [Typological Studies in Language 87], Norbert Cyffer, Erwin Ebermann, Georg Ziegelmeyer (eds), 139-165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Gulf of Guinea creoles: Genetic and typological relations. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 26(1): 111-154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagemeijer, Tjerk, Généreux, Michel, Hendrickx, Iris, Pereira, Amália, Tiny, Abigail & Zamora, Armando. 2014. The Gulf of Guinea creole corpora. In N. Calzolari et al. (eds), Proceedings of the he 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 523-529. Reykjavik: European Language Resources Association.
Hagemeijer, Tjerk & Ogie, Ota. 2011. Edo influence on Santome: Evidence from verb serialization and beyond. In Creoles, their Substrates, and Language Typology [Typological Studies in Language 95], Claire Lefebvre (ed.), 37-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2008. Reconstruction in syntax. In Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302], Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds), 73-95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. & Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2005. On reflexive forms in creoles. Lingua 115: 201-257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Bart. 2009. The Upper Guinea origins of Papiamentu. Linguistic and historical evidence. Diachronica 26(3): 319-379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. The Origins of Papiamentu: Linguistic and Historical Ties with Upper Guinea. PhD dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich.
Lewis, M. Paul. 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 16th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 2002. Myths and the prehistory of grammars. Journal of Linguistics 38(1): 113-136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe & Guardiano, Cristina. 2009. Evidence for syntax as a signal of historical relatedness. Lingua 119: 1679–1706. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lord, Carol. 1993. Historical Change in Serial Verb Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzino, Gerardo. 1998. The Angolar Creole Portuguese of São Tomé: Its Grammar and Sociolinguistic History. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.
Martinus, Efraim F. 1996. The Kiss of a Slave: Papiamentu’s West-African Connections. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Matos, Raimundo J. da Cunha. 1842. Corographia Histôrica das Ilhas de S. Thomé, Principe, Anno Bom e Fernando Pó. Porto: Typographia da Revista.Google Scholar
Maurer, Philippe. 1992. L’apport lexical bantou en Angolar. Afrikanische Arbeitspapiere 29: 163-174.Google Scholar
. 1995. L’Angolar: Un Créole Afro-portugaise Parlé à São Tomé. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
. 1999. El verbo locativo poner en santomense, principense y angolar. In Lenguas Criollas de Base Lexical Española y Portuguesa, Klaus Zimmermann (ed.), 89-100. Frankfurt/Madrid: Vervuert/ Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
. 2009. Principense. Grammar, texts, and vocabulary of the Afro-Portuguese creole of the island of Príncipe. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
. 2013. Papiamentu. In The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. II: Portuguese-based, Spanish-based, and French-based languagues, Susanne Michaelis, Phillipe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 163-181. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Melzian, Hans Joachim. 1937. A Concise Dictionary of the Bini Language of Southern Nigeria. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Susanne, Maurer, Philippe, Haspelmath, Martin & Huber, Magnus (eds). 2013. The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. II: Portuguese-based, Spanish-based, and French-based Languagues. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John. 2001. The world’s simplest grammars are creole grammars. Linguistic Typology 5(2-3): 125-166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Defining Creole. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Mufwene, Salikoko. 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muysken, Pieter & Smith, Norval. 1994. Reflexives. In Pidgins and Creoles. An Introduction [Creole Language Library 15], Jacques Arends, Pieter Muysken & Norval Smith (eds), 271-288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael. 2000. Out of Africa. London: Battlebridge.Google Scholar
Pires, Acrísio & Thomason, Sarah G. 2008. How much syntactic reconstruction is possible? In Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 302], Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach (eds), 27–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2008. Creoles as interlanguages: Syntactic structures. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 23: 307-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Post, Marike. 1992. The serial verb construction in Fa d’Ambu. In Actas do Colóquio sobre Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa, Ernesto d’Andrade & Alain Kihm (eds), 153-169. Lisbon: Colibri.Google Scholar
. 1997. Negation in Fa d’Ambô. In Afrolusitanistik – eine Vergessene Disziplin in Deutschland?, Ruth Degenhardt, Thomas Stolz & Hella Ulferts (eds), 292-316. Bremen: Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
Quint, Nicolas. 2000. Le Cap Verdien: Origines et Devenir d’une Langue Metisse. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sarah. 2000. Nativization and genesis of Hawaiian Creole. In Language Change and Language Contact in Pidgins and Creoles [Creole Language Library 21], John McWhorter (ed.), 257-300, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2008. The Emergence of Pidgin and Creole Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Thornton, John. 1992. Africa and Africans in the Making of the Atlantic World, 1400–1680. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Veenstra, Tonjes. 2008. Pidgin/creole genesis: The impact of the language bioprogram hypothesis. In The Handbook of Pidgin and Creole Studies, Silvia Kouwenberg & John Singler (eds), 219-241. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vogt, John. 1973. The early Sao Tome-Principe slave trade with Mina, 1500–1540. International Journal of African Studies VI(3): 453–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walkden, George. 2013. The correspondence problem in syntactic reconstruction. Diachronica 30(1): 95-122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zamora, Armando. 2010. Gramática Descriptiva del Fa d’Ambô. Barcelona: CEIBA Ediciones.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cardoso, Hugo C.
2020. Contact and Portuguese‐Lexified Creoles. In The Handbook of Language Contact, ► pp. 469 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.