Cover not available
Part of
Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 47–82

Defining Focusing Modifiers in a cross-linguistic perspective

A discussion based on English, German, French and Italian

ORCID logo | University of Basel

The goal of this chapter is to reconnect with the research agenda of the “classic” studies on the so-called Focusing Modifiers (such as E. also, only, even) by tackling questions related to the intension (i.e. the defining properties) and the extension (i.e. the inventories) of the category. Since very few classic studies are devoted to Focusing Modifiers in more than one language, these issues are particularly pressing to address in a cross-linguistic perspective. In the present chapter, these questions will be discussed on the basis of data belonging to four languages of two distinct groups: two Germanic – English and German – and two Romance languages – French and Italian.

Published online: 24 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.03ces
References
Altmann, Hans
1976 Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1978 Gradpartikelprobleme. Zur Beschreibung von gerade, genau, eben, ausgerechnet, vor allem, insbesondere, zumindest, wenigstens. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2009 Gradpartikel. In Handbuch der deutschen Wortarten, Ludger Hoffmann (ed.), 357–385. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia
1999 Avverbi focalizzanti in italiano. Parametri per un’analisi. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 28(1): 43–83.Google Scholar
2000 Focalizzatori fra connessione e messa a fuoco. Il punto di vista delle varietà di apprendimento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar
2005 Additive and restrictive particles in Italian as a second language. Embedding in the verbal utterance structure. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, Henriëtte Hendriks (ed.), 405–444. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Ancora su anche, anche su ancora. Per uno studio comparativo dell’apprendimento e della gestione di strategie coesive in IL. In Diachronica et Synchronica. Studi in onore di Anna Giacalone Ramat, Romano Lazzeroni, Emanuele Banfi, Giuliano Bernini, Marina Chini & Giovanna Marotta (eds), 29–52. Pisa: ETS edizioni.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1996 Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baptiśta, Jorge & Català, Dolors
2011 Adverbes focalisateurs et analyse syntaxique automatique de groupes nominaux. In Passeurs de mots, passeurs d’espoir. Lexicologie, terminologie et traduction face au défi de la diversité, Marc Van Campenhoudt, Teresa Lino & Rute Costa (eds), 97–110. Paris: Editions des Archives Contemporaines.Google Scholar
Beaver, David & Clark, Brady
2003  Always and only. Why not all focus sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics 11: 323–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra
1996a L’acquisition des particules de portée dans une langue étrangère: auch / aussi, nur / seulement, immer / toujours . Mémoire de DEA, Université de Paris VIII.
1996b  I focalizzatori anche, ancora, sempre. Ms, Freie Universität Berlin.
Benazzo, Sandra & Giuliano, Patrizia
1998 Marqueurs de négation et particules de portée en français L2: où les placer ? AILE 11: 35–62.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Peter
1985  Aussi et auch: deux faux amis? Französisch heute 2: 144–150.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Hartmann, Katarina
2001 The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19: 229–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Charolles, Michel & Lamiroy, Béatrice
2007 Du lexique à la grammaire: Uniquement, seulement et simplement . Cahiers de lexicologie 90(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Clément, Daniele & Thümmel, Wolf
1975 Grundzüge einer Syntax der deutschen Standardsprache. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1990 Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2000 Sulla semantica di alcuni tipi di intensificazione in italiano: “Davvero, è proprio molto interessante!”, Romanistisches Jahrbuch 51: 87–107. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Fra teoria e pratica: Sintassi, semantica e traduzioni inglesi dell’avverbio proprio . Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata 30(1): 143–169.Google Scholar
2002a Intensification, modalisation et focalisation. Les différents effets des adverbes proprio, davvero et veramente. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
2002b Gli usi e le funzioni dell’avverbio proprio . Italica 79(4): 453–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Soprattutto tra avverbio focalizzante e congiunzione testuale . In Proceedings of the 12th Euralex International Congress, Vol. II, Elisa Corino, Carla Marello & Cristina Onesti (eds), 1129–1135. Alessandria-Torino: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2008 Gli avverbi paradigmatizzanti. In L’interfaccia lingua-testo. Natura e funzioni dell’articolazione informativa dell’enunciato, Angela Ferrari, Luca Cignetti, Anna-Maria De Cesare, Letizia Lala, Magda Mandelli, Claudia Ricci & Carlo Enrico Roggia (eds), 340–361. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita
2014 The contribution of the Basel Model to the description of polyfunctional discourse markers. The case of It. anche, Fr. aussi and Sp. también . In Discourse Segmentation in Romance Languages [ Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 250], Salvador Pons Bordería (ed.), 55–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2015 Additive particles in canonical word orders: A cross-linguistic, corpus-based study on Italian anche, French aussi and English also . In Focus Particles in the Romance and Germanic languages. Corpus-based and Experimental Approaches, Anna-Maria De Cesare & Cecilia Andorno (eds). Linguistik Online 71(2).Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1991 A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English. Tokio: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine
2004 Fokuspartikeln und Informationsgliederung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine & Klein, Wolfgang
1996 Fokuspartikeln in Lernervarietäten: Ein Analyserahmen und einige Beispiele. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 104: 73–114.Google Scholar
Ferrari, Angela & De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2004 L’interprétation de l’adverbe italien proprio entre lexique, syntaxe et textualité. In Structures et Discours. Mélanges offerts à Eddy Roulet, Antoine Auchlin, Lauarent Filliettaz, Anna Grobet, Jacques Moechler, Laurent Perrin, Corinne Rossari & Louis de Saussure (eds), 195–210. Québec: Éditions Nota Bene.Google Scholar
Foolen, Ad
1993 De Betekenis van Partikels. Een Dokumentatie van de Stand van het Onderzoek, met Bijzondere Aandacht voor maar . PhD dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen.
Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan
2011 Scalar additive operators in the languages of Europe. Language 87(1): 2–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
1989 Introduction. Prospects and problems of prototype theory. Linguistics 27: 587–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gezundhajt, Henriette
2000 Adverbes en -ment et opérations énonciatives. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney
2000 The Oxford Reference Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grevisse, Maurice & Goosse, André
. 111980 Le bon usage. Grammaire française avec des remarques sur la langue française d’aujourd’hui. Paris: Duculot.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude
1996 Les adverbes du français. Le cas des adverbes en -ment. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde
2010 Adjunct Adverbials in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard
1994 Lexikon deutscher Partikeln. Leipzig: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Elke & Weydt, Harald
. 32003 Handbuch der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R
1969 A presuppositional analysis of only and even . In Paper from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert I. Binnick, Alice Green & Jerry Morgan (eds), 98–107. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Joachim
1983 Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1977 Zur Syntax und Semantik von Gradpartikeln. Versuch einer allgemeinen Charakterisierung. In Semantik und Pragmatik, Akten des 11. Ling. Kolloquiums Aachen 1976, Konrad Sprengel, Wolf-Dietrich Bald & Heiz Werner Viethen (eds), 63–70. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1981 The meaning of scalar particles in German. In Words, Worlds, and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Rieser (eds), 107–132. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
1991a The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991b Gradpartikeln. In Semantik: ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung / An international Handbook of Contemporary Research, Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 786–803. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
1991c Identical values in conflicting roles: The use of German ausgerechnet, eben, genau and gerade as focus particles. In Discourse Particles. Descriptive and Theoretical Investigations on the Logical, Syntactic and Pragmatic Properties of Discourse Particles in German [Pragmatics & Beyond 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 11–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993 Focus Particles. In Syntax. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung / An international Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, Joachim Jacobs, Arnim von Stechow, Wolfgang Sternefeld & Theo Vennemann (eds), 978–987. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard, Stark, Detlef
& Requardt, Susanne 1990 Adverbien und Partikeln. Ein deutsch-englisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.Google Scholar
Koktova, Eva
1987 On the scoping properties of negation, focusing particles and sentence adverbials. Theoretical Linguistics 14: 173–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 Word-Order Based Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1999 Additive particles under stress. In Proceedings of SALT 8, Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 111–128. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
La Forgia, Francesca
2006 Alcune osservazioni sui focalizzatori. Studi italiani di linguistica teorica e applicata 35(2): 359–385.Google Scholar
Lonzi, Lidia
1991 Il sintagma avverbiale. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. 2, Lorenzo Renzi & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 341–412. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia & Schäfer, Martin
2011 Adverbs and adverbials. In Semantics. An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1392–1420. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Miller, Jim
2006 Focus in the languages of Europe. In Pragmatic Organization of Discourse in the Languages of Europe, Giuliano Bernini & Marcia L. Schwartz (eds), 121–214. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Molinier, Christian & Levrier, Françoise
2000 Grammaire des adverbes. Description des formes en -ment. Genève/Paris: Droz.Google Scholar
Moser, Megan
1992 Focus Particles: Their definition and relational structure. Papers from the 28th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, Costas P. Canakis & Grace P. Chan (eds), 397–411. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1991 BUT, ONLY, JUST: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English 1500-1900. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nølke, Henning
1982 Problems in the semantic/pragmatic description of French adverbials like même, aussi, surtout and seulement . Acta Linguistica 17: 157–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1983 Les adverbes paradigmatisants: Fonction et analyse. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
1996 Les adverbes paradigmatisants révisés: Non sur tout mais surtout sur surtout . RASK 4: 3–33.Google Scholar
Pecoraro, Walter & Pisacane, Chiara
1984 L’avverbio. Bologna: Zanichelli.Google Scholar
Perrin-Naffakh, Anne-Marie
1996  Aussi adjonctif: De la syntaxe à la sémantique. Le français moderne 64(2): 136–154.Google Scholar
Poźlewicz, Agnieszka
2011a Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der Operatorpartikeln des Deutschen. Versuch einer Systematik. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
2011b Versuch einer Subklassifikation deutscher Operatorpartikeln. In Felder der Sprache – Felder der Forschung, Dorota Kaczmarek, Jacek Makowski, Marcin Michoń & Zenon Weigt (eds), 126–133. Łódź: Primum Verbum.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1972 A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide
1994 Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity / radiality of the notion of adverb. Rivista di Linguistica 6(2): 289–326.Google Scholar
Rauh, Gisa
2002 Word classes as prototypical categories. In Language: Context and cognition. Papers in Honour of Wolf-Dietrich Bald’s 60th Birthday, Sybil Scholz, Monika Klages, Evelyn Hantson & Ute Römer (eds), 259–270. München: Langenscheidt-Longman.Google Scholar
Ricca, Davide
1999 Osservazioni preliminari sui focalizzatori in italiano. In Grammatica e discorso. Studi sull’acquisizione dell’italiano e del tedesco, Norbert Dittmar & Anna Giacalone Ramat (eds), 146–164. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats
1985 Association with Focus. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Ross, John R. & Cooper, William E
1979  Like syntax. In Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies presented to Merrill Garret, William E. Cooper & Edward C.T. Walker (eds), 343–418. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2013 Le parti del discorso. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Vanelli, Laura
2004 Nuova grammatica italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Schlyter, Suzanne
1977 La place des adverbes en -ment en français. PhD dissertation, Universität Konstanz.
Schwarze, Christoph
1995 [1988] Grammatik der italienischen Sprache, 2nd revised edn. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Grammatica della lingua italiana, edizione interamente riveduta dall’autore. Adriano Colombo (ed.). Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Serianni, Luca
2010 [11988] Grammatica italiana. Italiano comune e lingua letteraria. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
Sudhoff, Stefan
2010 Focus Particles in German. Syntax, Prosody, and Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 151]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Fokuspartikelinventare des Niederländischen und Deutschen. In Nicht-flektierende Wortarten, Björn Rothstein (ed.), 203–223. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taglicht, Josef
1984 Message and Emphasis. On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ureña Gómez-Moreno, Pedro
2009 Los focalizadores del ingles: Análisis morfosintáctico y semántico-pragmático de even y also basado en corpus. Granada: Editorial de la Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Wandruszka, Ulrich
1982 Studien zur italienischen Wortstellung: Worstellung – Semantik – Informationsstruktur. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Andorno, Cecilia & Anna-Maria De Cesare
2017. Chapter 6. Mapping additivity through translation. In Focus on Additivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 278], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Andrushenko, Olena
2023. PARTICULARIZING FOCUS MARKERS IN OLD ENGLISH: JUST A CASE OF ADVERB POLYSEMY?. Lege artis. Language yesterday, today, tomorrow ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Atayan, Vahram
2017. Chapter 3. On the distribution of additive focus particles addirittura and perfino/persino in Italian. In Focus on Additivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 278], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Chantavarin, Suphasiree, Emily Morgan & Fernanda Ferreira
2022. Robust Processing Advantage for Binomial Phrases with Variant Conjunctions. Cognitive Science 46:9 DOI logo
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2017. Introduction. In Focus on Additivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 278], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2018. French adverbial cleft sentences. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2022. To be or not to be focus adverbials?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 204 ff. DOI logo
Favaro, Marco
2020. Chapter 4. From focus marking to illocutionary modification. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 112 ff. DOI logo
Fiorentini, Ilaria
2017. Chapter 10. Ënghe, ence and also anche. In Focus on Additivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 278], ► pp. 311 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien
2018. Interpersonal adverbs in FDG. In Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series, 205], ► pp. 48 ff. DOI logo
König, Ekkehard
2017. Chapter 1. Syntax and semantics of additive focus markers from a cross-linguistic perspective. In Focus on Additivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 278], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
TROTZKE, ANDREAS & LAIA MAYOL
2021. Catalan focus markers as discourse particles. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 871 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.