Cover not available
Part of
Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 133–156

Between inflection and derivation

Adverbial suffixes in English and German

| University of Bochum
The question of whether adverbial suffixes are derivational or inflectional elements has been controversially discussed in recent decades. Based on general differences between inflection and derivation, we argue that the English adverbial suffix -ly has more characteristics of an inflectional than of a derivational element and has acquired great generality as an adverb marker in present-day English. German, in contrast, has not developed a general adverb marker. Due to phonological changes, a widespread adverb marker in earlier stages of German and English (OHG -o, OE and MHG -e) disappeared. The element -lich which was a frequent adverbial suffix in MHG, is no longer productive. Another possible candidate in German for becoming a new adverb marker was -(er)weise, which, however, has been used since the 19th century for a differentiation between sentence adverbs and manner adverbs. We argue that this lexical differentiation between sentence and manner adverbs, which has no parallel in English or the Romance languages, can be related to the more flexible word order in German. Whereas English and some Romance languages differentiate between sentence adverbs and manner adverbs by their positions in the sentence, German employs lexical means for this differentiation.
Published online: 24 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.06pit
References (45)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis 1997. Adverb Placement: A Case Study in Antisymmetric Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. On the status of Adverb in a grammar without a lexicon. In Das Adverb. Zentrum und Peripherie einer Wortklasse, Friederike Schmöe (ed.), 25–42. Wien: Edition Praesens.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Renouf, Antoinette. 1996. Chronicling the Times: productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72(1): 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Leila. 1998. Ambiguität und Alternation. Methodologie und Theoriebildung in der Lexikonforschung. Habilitation thesis, University of Munich.
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology. A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Gulielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Confais, Jean Paul. 1989. Grammaire explicative. Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Barz, Irmhild. 2012. Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2003. Syntactic conditions on adjunct classes. In Modifying Adjuncts, Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen, Ewald Lang & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 163–209. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frey, Werner & Pittner, Karin. 1998. Zur Positionierung von Adverbialen im deutschen Mittelfeld. Linguistische Berichte 176: 489–534.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbialpositionen im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Sprachspezifische Aspekte der Informationsverteilung [Studia Grammatica 47], Monika Doherty (ed.), 14–40. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz J. 2012. The morphology of -ly and the categorial status of ‘adverbs’ in English. English language and linguistics 16(3): 341–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimm, Jacob. 1890. Deutsche Grammatik, Teil 3. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.Google Scholar
Guimier, Claude. 1985. On the origin of the suffix -ly . In Historical Semantics, Historical Word Formation, Jaçek Fisiak (ed.), 155–170. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heinle, Eva-Maria. 2000. Wortbildung des Neuhochdeutschen bis zur Mitte des 20. Jahrhunderts. In Sprachgeschichte. Ein Handbuch zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und ihrer Erforschung, 2. Vols, Werner Besch, Anne Betten & Oskar Reichmann (eds), 1911–1918. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. et al. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Killie, Kristin. 1998. The spread of -ly to present participles. In Advances in English Historical Linguistics, Jaçek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds), 119–134. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kjellmer, Göran. 1984. Why great:greatly but not big:*bigly? On the formation of English adverbs in -ly . Studia Linguistica 38: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenker, Ursula. 2000. Is it, stylewise or otherwise, wise to use -wise? Domain adverbs and the history of English -wise . In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on English Historical Linguistics. Santiago de Compostela, 7-11 September, 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 223] Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds), 157–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A focus on adverbial connectors: Connecting, partitioning and focusing attention in the history of English. In Connectives in Synchrony and Diachrony in European Languages [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 8], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Ursula Lenker (eds). Helsinki: VARIENG. <[URL]>Google Scholar
. 2014. Knitting and Splitting Information: Medial Placement of Linking Adverbials in the History of English. In Contact, Variation and Change in the History of English [Studies in Language Companion Series 159], Simone E. Pfenninger, Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja, Marianne Hundt & Daniel Schreier (eds), 11–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntosh, Angus. 1991. Old English adjectives with derivative -lic partners: Some semantic problems. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 9(3): 297–310.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1994. Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modem English. In Studies in Early Modern English, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 243–259. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Opdahl, Luise. 2000. LY or zero suffix? A Study in the Function of Dual Form Adverbs in Present-day English, 2 Vols. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Paraschkewoff, Boris. 1976. Zur Entstehungs- und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Bildungen auf -weise (Teil l). Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur (PBB Halle) 97: 165–211.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann 1920[1968]. Deutsche Grammatik, Band V. Teil V: Wortbildungslehre. Reprint Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Payne, John, Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 2010. The distribution and category status of adjectives and adverbs. Word Structure 3(1): 31–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 2004. Where syntax and semantics meet: Adverbial positions in the German middle field. In Adverbials. The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 70], Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelberg & Gisa Rauh (eds), 253–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 2003. Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. New York NY: Longman.Google Scholar
Pounder, Amanda. 2001. Adverb‐marking in German and English. System and standardization. Diachronica 18(2): 301–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo & Ricca, Davide. 1994. Prototypical adverbs: On the scalarity/radiality of the notion ADVERB. Rivista di Linguistica 6: 289–326.Google Scholar
. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, Johan van der Auwera (ed.), 187–275. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1988. Inflection and derivation. Linguistics 26: 561–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sugioka, Yoko & Lehr, Rachel. 1983. Adverbial -ly as an inflectional affix. In Papers from the Parasession on the Interplay of Phonology, Morphology and Syntax, John F. Richardson, Mitchell Marks & Amy Chukerman (eds), 293–300. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Swan, Toril. 1988. Sentence Adverbials in English. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
. 1991. Adverbial shifts: Evidence from Norwegian and English. In Historical English Syntax, Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 409–438. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Ito, Rika. 2002. Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English dual form adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2): 236–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1986. From polysemy to internal semantic reconstruction. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting, Mary Niepokuj, Mary VanClay, Vassiliki Nikiforidou & Deborah Feder (eds), 389–405. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65: 31–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhler, Karl. 1926. Die Bedeutungsgleichheit der altenglischen Adjektiva und Adverbia mit und ohne -lic (-lice). Anglistische Forschungen 62: 1–68.Google Scholar
Wilmanns, Wilhelm. 1899. Deutsche Grammatik, 2. Abteilung. Berlin: Truebner.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1995. Why English -ly is not inflectional. In Papers from the 31st Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS 31), Vol.1, Audra Dainora, Rachel Hemphill, Barbara Luka, Barbara Need & Sheri Pargman (eds), 523–535. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

De Cesare, Anna-Maria, Ana Albom, Doriana Cimmino & Marta Lupica Spagnolo
2020. Domain adverbials in the news. Languages in Contrast 20:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2017. Chapter 1. Adjectives with adverbial functions in Romance. In Adjective Adverb Interfaces in Romance [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 242], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.