Cover not available
Part of
Adverbs: Functional and diachronic aspects
Edited by Karin Pittner, Daniela Elsner and Fabian Barteld
[Studies in Language Companion Series 170] 2015
► pp. 157–178

On the distinction between adverbs and adjectives in Middle High German

| University of Hamburg

The distinction between adverbs and adjectives is problematic for German. In New High German, for instance, adjective stems can be used adverbially and there is a debate whether they should be categorised as adjective or as adverb. In this paper, I propose three parameters that are related to the adnominal, adverbial and predicative function in order to distinguish between different types of modifiers instead of just distinguishing between adverb and adjective. These parameters are then used for a subset of Middle High German modifiers. It is shown that the suffixes -e and -lich(e) exhibit functional profiles that are neither typical for adverbs nor for adjectives. This leads to the conclusion that they are therefore neither adjective- nor adverb-deriving suffixes, but suffixes with a different function: deriving modifying words that are used both adverbially and adnominally but not predicatively.

Published online: 24 September 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.170.07bar
References
Braune, Wilhelm
2004 Althochdeutsche Grammatik, I: Laut- und Formenlehre, Ingo Reiffenstein (ed.), 15th edn. [Sammlung Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte / A]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2003 Typology and Universals, 2nd edn. [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.] Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Diepeveen, Janneke
2011 Adverb formation and modification: English, German and Dutch adverbial morphology in contrast. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 47(4): 710–731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diepeveen, Janneke & Van de Velde, Freek
2010 Adverbial morphology: How Dutch and German are moving away from English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(4): 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
2006 Grundriss der Deutschen Grammatik, Band 2: Der Satz, 3rd edn. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler.Google Scholar
Helbig, Gerhard & Buscha, Joachim
2001 Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht, 22nd edn. Berlin: Langenscheidt.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees
2005 Parts of speech. In Crucial Readings in Functional Grammar [Functional Grammar Series], Matthew P. Anstey & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 79–106. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Parts-of-speech systems and morphological types. ACLC Working Papers 2(1): 31–48.Google Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & van Lier, Eva
2010 An implicational map of parts of speech. Linguistic Discovery 8(1): 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-Based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klein, Thomas, Solms, Hans-Joachim & Wegera, Klaus-Peter
2009 Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, Teil III: Wortbildung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W
2008 Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paraschkewoff, Boris
1967 Entwicklung der Adjektivadverbien im Ostmitteldeutschen vom Beginn der Überlieferung bis Luther. PhD dissertation, Karl-Marx-Universität.
1974 Zur Entwicklung des qualitativen Adverbs im Deutschen. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 11: 288–291.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
2007 Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 25th edn. [Sammlung Kurzer Grammatiken Germanischer Dialekte A, 2]. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pounder, Amanda
2001 Adverb-marking in German and English. System and standardization. Diachronica 18(2): 301–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo
2011 Adverbial grammaticalization. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization [Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics], Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 502–510. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan
2013 Flexible Word Classes: Typological Studies of Underspecified Parts of Speech. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmid, Hans Ulrich
1998 -lîh-Bildungen. Vergleichende Untersuchungen zu Herkunft, Entwicklung und Funktion eines Althochdeutschen Suffixes. Studien zum Althochdeutschen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Vogel, Petra M
1997 Unflektierte Adjektive im Deutschen. Zum Verhältnis von semantischer Struktur und syntaktischer Funktion und ein Vergleich mit flektierten Adjektiven. Sprachwissenschaft 22: 403–432.Google Scholar
1999 Sprachwandel und der ‘Zusammenbruch’ von Wortartensystemen. In Elemente des Sprachwandels, Siegfried Kanngießer & Petra M. Vogel (eds), 163–194. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
2000 Grammaticalisation and part-of-speech systems. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology], Petra M. Vogel & Bernard Comrie (eds), 259–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Gertraud
1995 Die Wortbildung mit -lich im Alt-, Mittel- und Frühneuhochdeutschen [Sprache – Literatur und Geschichte]. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar