Chapter 3. Free self-forms in discourse-pragmatic functions
The role of viewpoint and contrast in picture NPs
This paper contributes to the study of picture NPs, as one of various contexts that encourage the use of unbound self-forms. The paper emphasises the need for a clear terminological distinction between different self-forms, of which standard reflexives are only one type. Based on findings from the British National Corpus, the Northern Ireland Corpus of Transcribed Speech, and the Freiburg Corpus of English Dialects, an extended definition of picture NPs is proposed for cases with and without representational nouns (That’s (a picture of) myself) which can be attributed to the conversational context. A Pronoun Usage Questionnaire is used to test constraints and explanations proposed in previous studies on self-forms in picture NPs (in particular Cantrall 1974 and Kuno 1987), and to assess their general acceptability among English native speakers. The results presented provide strong evidence against a ‘one form-one meaning’ approach, showing that pronoun choice in conversation is frequently influenced by discourse-pragmatic factors, such as viewpoint and contrast.
References
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
Baker, Carl L
1995 Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English.
Language 71(1): 63-101.
Cantrall, William R
1973 Reflexive pronouns and viewpoint.
Linguistische Berichte 28: 42-50.
Cantrall, William R
1974 Viewpoint, Reflexives, and the Nature of Noun Phrases. The Hague: Mouton.
Carroll, Susanne
1986 On non-anaphor reflexives.
Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 15(2): 135-165.
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding [
Studies in Generative Grammar 9]. Dordrecht: Foris.
Drogosz, Anna
2008 Reflexivization in English and Polish – A Cognitive Grammar Approach. Olsztyn: Instytut Neofilologii UWM.
Emonds, Joseph
1986 Grammatically deviant prestige constructions. In
A Festschrift for Sol Saporta,
Michael Brame,
Heles Contreras &
Frederick J. Newmeyer (eds), 93-129. Seattle WA: Noit Amrofer.
Filppula, Markku
1999 The Grammar of Irish English – Language in Hibernian Style. London: Routledge.
Filppula, Markku
2004 Irish English: Morphology and syntax. In
A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax,
Bernd Kortmann &
Edgar Schneider (eds), 73-101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gast, Volker
2004 The interpretation of logophoric self-forms, and some consequences for a model of reference and denotation. In
Proceedings of the 5th Discourse Anaphora and Anaphora Resolution Colloquium DAARC,
António Branco, Tony McEnery &
Ruslan Mitkov (eds), 75-80. Lisbon: Ediçôes Colibri.
Goldwater, Micah B. & Runner, Jeffrey T
2006 Coreferential interpretations of reflexives in picture noun phrases: An experimental approach. In
Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference. Issues at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface, Pascal Denis,
Eric McCready, Alexis Palmer &
Brian Reese (eds), 28-34. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Grano, Thomas
2006 ‛Me and Her’ Meets ‛He and I’: Case, Person, and Linear Ordering in English Coordinated Pronouns. BA thesis, Stanford University.
[URL]
Hagège, Claude
1974 Les pronoms logophoriques.
Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69: 287-310.
Harris, John
1993 The grammar of Irish English. In
Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles,
James Milroy &
Lesley Milroy (eds), 139-186. London: Longman.
Heacock, Paul
(ed.) 2008 Cambridge Dictionary of American English, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hernández, Nuria
2002 A context hierarchy of untriggered self-forms in English.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik (ZAA) – A Quarterly of Language, Literature and Culture 3: 269-284. Special issue
Reflexives and Intensifiers: The Use of Self-Forms in English
,
Ekkehard König &
Volker Gast (eds).
Hernández, Nuria
2012 Personal Pronouns in the Dialects of England: A Corpus Study of Grammatical Variation in Spontaneous Speech. PhD dissertation, Freiburg University.
[URL]
Jespersen, Otto
1949 (1909) A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. VII: Syntax. Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard.
Kirk, John M
1992 The Northern Ireland transcribed corpus of speech. In
New Directions in English Language Corpora: Methodology, Results, Software Developments,
Gerhard Leitner (ed.), 65-73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kjellmer, Göran
1986 ‛Us Anglos are a cut above the field’: On objective pronouns in nominative contexts.
English Studies 67(5): 445-449.
Kleinedler, Steven R. & Eggert, Randall
Indexi-lexicography. In
Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [
Studies in Language Companion Series 80],
Betty J. Birner &
Gregory Ward (eds) 195 215 Amsterdam John Benjamins
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter
Kuno, Susumu
1987 Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
Kuno, Susumu
2006 Empathy and direct discourse perspectives. In
The Handbook of Pragmatics,
Laurence R. Horn &
Gregory Ward (eds), 315-343. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lees, Robert B. & Klima, Edward S
1963 Rules for English pronominalization.
Language 39(1): 17-28.
Levinson, Stephen C
1983 Pragmatics. Cambridge: CUP
Levinson, Stephen C
2006 Deixis. In
The Handbook of Pragmatics,
Laurence R. Horn &
Gregory Ward (eds), 97-121. Oxford: Blackwell.
Miller, Jim
1993 The grammar of Scottish English. In
Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles,
James Milroy &
Lesley Milroy (eds), 99-138. London: Longman.
Parker, Frank, Riley, Kathryn & Meyer, Charles F
1988 Case assignment and the ordering of constituents in coordinate constructions.
American Speech 63(3): 214-233.
Parker, Frank, Riley, Kathryn & Meyer, Charles F
1990 Untriggered reflexive pronouns in English.
American Speech 65(1): 50-69.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rooryck, Johan & Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido
2007 The syntax of spatial anaphora. Tromsø Working Papers on Language & Linguistics: Nordlyd 34(2), special issue on Space, Motion, and Result, Monika Bašić,
Marina Pantcheva,
Minjeong Son &
Peter Svenonius (eds), 33-85. Tromsø: Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics.
Runner, Jeffrey T., Sussman, Rachel S. & Tanenhaus, Michael K
2003 Assignment of reference to reflexives and pronouns in picture noun phrases: Evidence from eye movements.
Cognition 81(1): B1-B13.
Sankoff, David, Thibault, Pierrette & Bérubé, Hélène
1978 Semantic field variability. In
Linguistic Variation: Models and Methods,
David Sankoff (ed.), 23-43. New York NY: Academic Press.
Schütze, Carson T
2001 On the nature of default case.
Syntax 4(3): 205-238.
Siemund, Peter
2003 Varieties of English from a cross-linguistic perspective: Intensifiers and reflexives. In
Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English,
Günter Rohdenburg &
Britta Mondorf (eds), 479–506. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stein, Dieter
1997 Syntax and varieties. In
Taming the Vernacular – From Dialect to Written Standard Language,
Jenny Cheshire &
Dieter Stein (eds), 35-50. London: Longman.
Stern, Nancy
2004 The semantic unity of reflexive, emphatic, and other –self pronouns.
American Speech 79(3): 270-280.
Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid
1994 Standard and non-standard pronominal usage in English, with special reference to the eighteenth century. In
Towards a Standard English 1600–1800,
Dieter Stein &
Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), 217-242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Warshawsky, Florence
1965 Reflexivization. Mimeographed, MIT.
Zribi-Hertz, Anne
1989 Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse.
Language 65(4): 695-727.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Hernández, Nuria
2021.
Personal Pronouns: Variation and Ambiguity.
Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 69:3
► pp. 237 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.