Cover not available
Part of
The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 171] 2015
► pp. 125–146

Chapter 7. Breaking the fourth wall

The pragmatic functions of the second person pronoun in House of Cards

| Aix-Marseille University, LERMA, IUF

This paper focuses on the American TV series version of House of Cards, paying specific attention to the second person pronoun used by the protagonist (Francis Underwood) in his address to the viewer, thus breaking the classical fourth wall. It both evinces the similarities of the use of the second person pronoun in literature and in the TV series and highlights the differences due to the specificity of the TV medium. It also points out the subtle manipulation of the viewer generated by the versatile nature and various pragmatic functions of “you” in House of Cards. Leaning on psycho-cognitive research, it finally discusses the success of the series in assigning the viewer the place of the protagonist’s complicit partner.

Published online: 10 November 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.171.07sor
References
Allbritton, David W. & Gerrig, Richard J
1991 Participatory responses in text understanding. Journal of Memory and Language 30: 603-626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
1974 Problèmes de linguistique générale II. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1979 To catch a metaphor: You as norm. American Speech 54(3): 194-209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blank, Paula C
2014 To figure out House of Cards, read a lot of Shakespeare. The Star, February 12 2014, <[URL] (14 March 2014).Google Scholar
Bonheim, Helmut
1982 Conative solicitude and the anaphoric pronoun in the Canadian short story. In Sprachtheorie und Angewandte Linguistik: Festschrift für Alfred Wollmann zum 60. Geburstag [Tübingen Beiträge zur Linguistik 195], Werner Wolte (ed.), 77-86. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1983 Narration in the second person. Recherches Anglaises et Américaines 16: 69-80.Google Scholar
Booth, Wayne
1983 The Rhetoric of Fiction (1961). Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brontë, Charlotte
2006 Jane Eyre (1847). London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C
1987 Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bubel, Claudia
2008 Film audiences as overhearers. Journal of Pragmatics 40: 55-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, Carrol
2005 Embodying “you”: Levinas and a question of the second person. Journal of Literary Semantics 34: 995-105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Haugh, Michael
2014 Pragmatics and the English Language. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & McIntyre, Dan
2006 Drama: Stylistic aspects. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol 3, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed.), 772-85. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DelConte, Matt
2003 Why you can’t speak: Second-person narration, voice, and a new model for understanding narrative. Style 37(2): 204-219.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Michael
1989 House of Cards. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Duchan, Judith F., Bruder, Gail A. & Hewitt, Lynne E
(eds) 1995 Deixis in Narrative: A Cognitive Science Perspective. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta
2010 Not hearing things—Hearer/listener categories in polylogues. mediAzioni 1974-43829. [URL]
2011a “You talking to me?” The viewer as a ratified listener to film discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1628-1644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Goffman's postulates on participant statuses in verbal interaction. Language and Linguistics 5/7: 454-465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fludernik, Monica
1993 Second-person fiction. NarrativeYouas addressee and/or protagonist. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 18: 217-247.Google Scholar
1994 Introduction: Second-person narrative and related issues.Style 28(3): 281-311.Google Scholar
1996 Towards a “natural” Narratology. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gavins, Joanna
2007 Text World Theory: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrig, Richard J
1993 Experiencing Narrative World. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hantzis, Darlene Marie
1988 “You are about to begin reading”: The Nature and Function of Second Person Point of View. PhD dissertation, Louisiana State University.
Heritage, John
1985 Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 3, Teun A. van Dijk(ed.), 95-119. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Herman, David
1994 Textual “You” and double deixis in Edna O’Brien’s A Pagan Place . Style 28(3): 378-411.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Mary Frances & Perkins, Leon
1980 Second person point of view in narrative. In Critical Survey of Short Fiction, Frank N. Magill (ed.), 119-32. Hackensack NJ: Salem.Google Scholar
Horton, William S & Rapp, David N
2003 Out of sight, out of mind: occlusion and the accessibility of information in narrative comprehension. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10(1) : 104-110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House of Cards
. Intégrale saisons 1 et 2. Robin Wright, David Fincher and James Foley (directors).
Iser, Wolfgang
1974 The Implied Reader. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kacandes, Irene
1990 Narrative Apostrophe: Case Studies in Second Person Fiction. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
1993 Are you in the text? The “Literary Performative” in postmodernist fiction. Text and Performance Quaterly 13: 139-53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitawaga, Chisato & Lehrer, Adrienne
1990 Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739-759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kozloff, Sarah
2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Margolin, Uri
1990 Narrative “you” revisited. Language and Style 23(4): 425-46.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Dan
2008 Integrating multimodal analysis and the stylistics of drama: A multimodal perspective on Ian McKellen’s Richard III . Language and Literature 17: 309-334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morrissette, Bruce
1965 Narrative “you” in contemporary literature. Comparative Literature Studies 2: 1-24.Google Scholar
Polichak, James W. & Gerrig, Richard J
2002 “Get up and win!”: Participatory responses to narrative. In Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations, Melanie C. Green, Jeffrey J. Strange & Timothy C. Brock (eds), 71-95: Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald
1985 The narratee revisited. Style 19: 299-303.Google Scholar
1987 A Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Rapp, Davis N. & Gerrig, Richard J
2006 Predilections for narrative outcomes: The impact of story contexts and reader preference. Journal of Memory and Language 54: 54-67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Brian
1991 The poetics and politics of second-person narrative. Genre 24: 309-30.Google Scholar
2006 Unnatural Voices. Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Colombus OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Semino, Elena
1997 Language and World Creation in Poems and Other Texts. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William
1981 King Richard III, Anthony Hammond (ed.). London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine
2015 Person deixis and impersonation in Iain Banks’s Complicity . Language and Literature 24(1): 40-53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. Language and Manipulation in House of Cards. A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stirling, Lesley & Manderson, Lenore
2011 About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1581-1602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wales, Katie
1996 Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English [Studies in English Language]. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul
1999 Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Youngs, Ian
2007 Richardson’s rule in House of Cards. London BBC 9 Feb 2007. [URL] [8 December 2014].Google Scholar
Zurawick, David
2014 Kevin Spacey’s old-Hollywood values shape cutting-edge “House of Cards”. Interview with Kevin Spacey for the Baltimore Sun , February 2014, <[URL] [4 December 2014].
Zwaan, Rolf A
1999 Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. American Psychological Society 8(1): 15-18.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Haas, Florian
2018. “You can’t control a thing like that”. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85], ► pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Montoro, Rocío
2016. The year’s work in stylistics 2015. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 25:4 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Schoenmakers, Gert-Jan, Jihane Hachimi & Helen de Hoop
2024. Can You Make a Difference? The Use of (In)Formal Address Pronouns in Advertisement Slogans. Journal of International Consumer Marketing 36:2 ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Sorlin, Sandrine
2016. Aesthetic Manipulation. In Language and Manipulation in House of Cards, ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
Sorlin, Sandrine
2018. Strategies of involvement and moral detachment inHouse of Cards. Journal of Literary Semantics 47:1 ► pp. 21 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.