Article published in:
The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 171] 2015
► pp. 311334
References
Atlas, Jay D. & Levinson, Stephen C
1981It-clefts, informativeness and logical form. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 1–61. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C. Daniel
2009These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, Jean Decety & William Ickes (eds), 3–15. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1979To catch a metaphor: You as norm. American Speech 54: 194-209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Gilman, Albert
1960The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Style in Language, Thomas Albert Sebeoki (ed.), 253–276. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cartoni, Bruno, Zufferey, Sandrine & Meyer, Thomas
2013Using the Europarl corpus for cross-linguistic research. In Interference and Normalization in Genre-Controlled Multilingual Corpora [Belgian Journal of Linguistics 27], Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Mark H
1996Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf
in press). ‘Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects’. Journal of Pragmatics. Special issue on ‘Pronouns and perspective in literature’.)
Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan
2013Towards a typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1974Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Adrienne Lehrer
1990Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739–759. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linthe, Anna
2010Exploring the Function and Distribution of Generic Pronouns: The Example of German man and du. MPhil disssertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
1995Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, Sophia
2012Impersonal indexicals: One, you, man and du . Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15: 1–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike
2006Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257-281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Generalizing detached self-reference and the semantics of generic one . Mind and Language 25(4): 440–473. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg & Lampropoulou, Sofia
2012Impersonal you and stance-taking in social research interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 44:1206–1218. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Søren Beck, Fogtmann Fosgerau, Christina & Jensen, Torben Juel
2009From community to conversation and back. Exploring the interpersonal potentials of two generic pronouns in Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:116–142. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Patricia E
1994“You could feel it through the skin”: Agency and positioning in prisoners’ stabbing stories. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 14: 45–76. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Carl R
1959A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In Psychology: A Study of Science 3, Sigmund Koch (ed.), 184-256. New York NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1974Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy: Essays, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197-213. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley & Manderson, Lenore
2011About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1581–1602. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Gast, Volker & Vanderbiesen, Jeroen
2012Human impersonal pronouns in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 98(1): 27-64. Special issue A Germanic Sandwich , Esther Ruigendijk (ed.).Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai
2008What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22(1): 137–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht
2011Recent developments in ParaSol: Breadth for depth and XSLT based web concordancing with CWB. In Natural Language Processing, Multilinguality. Proceedings of Slovko 2011, Modra, Slovakia, 20–21 October 2011, Daniela Majchráková & Radovan Garabík (eds), 156-162. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen
2010What “you” and “I” mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2): 332–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zobel, Sarah
2012Impersonally Interpreted Personal Pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 6 other publications

Haas, Florian
2018.  In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85],  pp. 171 ff. Crossref logo
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
2019. Referential and pragmatic-discourse properties of Lithuanian reference impersonals: 2sg-imp, 3-imp and ma/ta-imp. Kalbotyra 72  pp. 32 ff. Crossref logo
Milà-Garcia, Alba
2022. Desacuerdo, atenuación y empatía en tutorías universitarias. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90  pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo
Sluchinski, Kerry
2021.  Ta as an emergent language practice of audience design in CMC. Narrative Inquiry Crossref logo
Sluchinski, Kerry
2022. Pronoun TA as a facilitator of empathy in Chinese digital narratives. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal Crossref logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Adri Breed
2018. Human impersonal pronouns in West Germanic. Studies in Language 42:4  pp. 798 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.