Second person forms of pronouns (e.g. Engl. you, Germ. du) or verbs (e.g. Russian pišeš ‘you write’) have a basically deictic function and refer to the addressee. In uses that have been called “impersonal” or “non-canonical”, the second person forms are used in a generalizing way (e.g. You only live once), often in combination with predicates that are not literally true of the addressee (e.g. As the Pope you have to be righteous, said by the Pope to a reporter). In this contribution we pursue two main goals. First, we propose a taxonomy of non-canonical uses of the second person as a frame of reference for future, especially quantitative, studies. Our second goal is to determine the pragmatic (non-truth-conditional) interpretive effects of impersonal uses of the second person. We argue that all instances of such forms imply, at an interactional level, the establishment of solidarity between the interlocutors, and at an expressive level, the presence of empathy with the members of the category over which a generalization is made. Accordingly, we propose the term “generalized empathy” as the main function of the relevant uses of the second person.
1981It-clefts, informativeness and logical form. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 1–61. New York NY: Academic Press.
Batson, C. Daniel
2009These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, Jean Decety & William Ickes (eds), 3–15. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Bolinger, Dwight
1979To catch a metaphor: You as norm. American Speech 54: 194-209.
Brown, Roger & Gilman, Albert
1960The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Style in Language, Thomas Albert Sebeoki (ed.), 253–276. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cartoni, Bruno, Zufferey, Sandrine & Meyer, Thomas
2013Using the Europarl corpus for cross-linguistic research. In Interference and Normalization in Genre-Controlled Multilingual Corpora [Belgian Journal of Linguistics 27], Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Davis, Mark H
1996Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf
in press). ‘Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects’. Journal of Pragmatics. Special issue on ‘Pronouns and perspective in literature’.)
Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan
2013Towards a typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Karttunen, Lauri
1974Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194.
Kitagawa, Chisato & Adrienne Lehrer
1990Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739–759.
Levinson, Stephen C
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Linthe, Anna
2010Exploring the Function and Distribution of Generic Pronouns: The Example of German man and du. MPhil disssertation, University of Sheffield.
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
Lyons, John
1995Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.
Malamud, Sophia
2012Impersonal indexicals: One, you, man and du. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15: 1–48.
Moltmann, Friederike
2006Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257-281.
Moltmann, Friederike
2010Generalizing detached self-reference and the semantics of generic one. Mind and Language 25(4): 440–473.
Myers, Greg & Lampropoulou, Sofia
2012Impersonal you and stance-taking in social research interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 44:1206–1218.
Nielsen, Søren Beck, Fogtmann Fosgerau, Christina & Jensen, Torben Juel
2009From community to conversation and back. Exploring the interpersonal potentials of two generic pronouns in Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:116–142.
O’Connor, Patricia E
1994“You could feel it through the skin”: Agency and positioning in prisoners’ stabbing stories. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 14: 45–76.
Rogers, Carl R
1959A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In Psychology: A Study of Science 3, Sigmund Koch (ed.), 184-256. New York NY: McGraw Hill.
Stalnaker, Robert
1974Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy: Essays, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197-213. New York NY: New York University Press.
Stirling, Lesley & Manderson, Lenore
2011About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1581–1602.
van der Auwera, Johan, Gast, Volker & Vanderbiesen, Jeroen
2012Human impersonal pronouns in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 98(1): 27-64. Special issue A Germanic Sandwich
, Esther Ruigendijk (ed.).
von Fintel, Kai
2008What is presupposition accommodation, again?Philosophical Perspectives 22(1): 137–170.
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht
2011Recent developments in ParaSol: Breadth for depth and XSLT based web concordancing with CWB. In Natural Language Processing, Multilinguality. Proceedings of Slovko 2011, Modra, Slovakia, 20–21 October 2011, Daniela Majchráková & Radovan Garabík (eds), 156-162. Bratislava.
Wechsler, Stephen
2010What “you” and “I” mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2): 332–365.
Zobel, Sarah
2012Impersonally Interpreted Personal Pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Göttingen.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.