Part of
The Pragmatics of Personal Pronouns
Edited by Laure Gardelle and Sandrine Sorlin
[Studies in Language Companion Series 171] 2015
► pp. 311334
References (28)
References
Atlas, Jay D. & Levinson, Stephen C. 1981. It-clefts, informativeness and logical form. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 1–61. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C. Daniel. 2009. These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In The Social Neuroscience of Empathy, Jean Decety & William Ickes (eds), 3–15. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1979. To catch a metaphor: You as norm. American Speech 54: 194-209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Roger & Gilman, Albert. 1960. The pronouns of power and solidarity. In Style in Language, Thomas Albert Sebeoki (ed.), 253–276. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cartoni, Bruno, Zufferey, Sandrine & Meyer, Thomas. 2013. Using the Europarl corpus for cross-linguistic research. In Interference and Normalization in Genre-Controlled Multilingual Corpora [Belgian Journal of Linguistics 27], Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds), 23–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Mark H. 1996. Empathy: A Social Psychological Approach. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gast, Volker, Lisa Deringer, Florian Haas & Olga Rudolf (in press). ‘Impersonal uses of the second person singular: A pragmatic analysis of generalization and empathy effects’. Journal of Pragmatics. Special issue on ‘Pronouns and perspective in literature’.)
Gast, Volker & van der Auwera, Johan. 2013. Towards a typology of human impersonal pronouns, based on data from European languages. In Languages Across Boundaries: Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska, Dik Bakker & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri. 1974. Presupposition and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato & Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 739–759. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Linthe, Anna. 2010. Exploring the Function and Distribution of Generic Pronouns: The Example of German man and du. MPhil disssertation, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malamud, Sophia. 2012. Impersonal indexicals: One, you, man and du . Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 15: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike. 2006. Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257-281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Generalizing detached self-reference and the semantics of generic one . Mind and Language 25(4): 440–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Myers, Greg & Lampropoulou, Sofia. 2012. Impersonal you and stance-taking in social research interviews. Journal of Pragmatics 44:1206–1218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, Søren Beck, Fogtmann Fosgerau, Christina & Jensen, Torben Juel. 2009. From community to conversation and back. Exploring the interpersonal potentials of two generic pronouns in Danish. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 41:116–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Connor, Patricia E. 1994. “You could feel it through the skin”: Agency and positioning in prisoners’ stabbing stories. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse 14: 45–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Carl R. 1959. A theory of therapy, personality and interpersonal relationships, as developed in the client-centered framework. In Psychology: A Study of Science 3, Sigmund Koch (ed.), 184-256. New York NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy: Essays, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197-213. New York NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley & Manderson, Lenore. 2011. About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 1581–1602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Gast, Volker & Vanderbiesen, Jeroen. 2012. Human impersonal pronouns in English, Dutch and German. Leuvense Bijdragen 98(1): 27-64. Special issue A Germanic Sandwich , Esther Ruigendijk (ed.).Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2008. What is presupposition accommodation, again? Philosophical Perspectives 22(1): 137–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht. 2011. Recent developments in ParaSol: Breadth for depth and XSLT based web concordancing with CWB. In Natural Language Processing, Multilinguality. Proceedings of Slovko 2011, Modra, Slovakia, 20–21 October 2011, Daniela Majchráková & Radovan Garabík (eds), 156-162. Bratislava.Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen, 2010. What “you” and “I” mean to each other: Person indexicals, self-ascription, and theory of mind. Language 86(2): 332–365. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zobel, Sarah. 2012. Impersonally Interpreted Personal Pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Göttingen.Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Fastrich, Bridgit
2024. Construal and impersonalization in German and English: Comparing impersonal pronouns in online hotel reviews. Lingua 308  pp. 103773 ff. DOI logo
Sorlin, Sandrine
2024. How pragmatically (in)definite are you and one?. In Structures in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 345],  pp. 36 ff. DOI logo
Yonezawa, Yoko
2024. Generic and vague uses of a second-person singular pronoun in an open-class person-reference system and speaker creativity in reported speech: the case of anata in Japanese. Linguistics DOI logo
Sluchinski, Kerry
2023. Pronoun TA as a facilitator of empathy in Chinese digital narratives. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 14:2  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Sluchinski, Kerry
2024.  Ta as an emergent language practice of audience design in CMC. Narrative Inquiry 34:1  pp. 78 ff. DOI logo
Milà-Garcia, Alba
2022. Desacuerdo, atenuación y empatía en tutorías universitarias. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Sangers, Nina, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul & Hans Hoeken
2022. Addressing the student. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 11 DOI logo
Yatziv‑Malibert, Il‑Il & Zohar Livnat
2021. Usages non déictiques et impersonnels de la deuxième personne du singulier en hébreu moderne parlé : trois approches. Yod 23  pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica
2019. Referential and pragmatic-discourse properties of Lithuanian reference impersonals: 2sg-imp, 3-imp and ma/ta-imp. Kalbotyra 72  pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Haas, Florian
2018. “You can’t control a thing like that”. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 85],  pp. 171 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Adri Breed
2018. Human impersonal pronouns in West Germanic. Studies in Language 42:4  pp. 798 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.