Article published in:
Language Contact and Change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun
Edited by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz and Carmen Jany
[Studies in Language Companion Series 173] 2016
► pp. 315–338

Auxiliation and typological shift

The interaction of language contact and internallymotivated change in Quechua

| SIL International
This paper documents the formation of auxiliary verbs and suffixes in Quechua and examines how processes of language evolution and contact introduce new aspectual contrasts expressed through verbal periphrases. Quechuan languages provide an excellent opportunity to examine the interaction of internal and external motivations for change because the auxiliation process suggests sequences of regular developments and also provides evidence for changes induced by contact with Spanish. The creation of numerous auxiliaries, coupled with stimulation of their productivity, enlarges the role for grammatical expression through periphrasis. Additionally, the contact-induced obstruction of verbal suffix formation weakens the sustainability of polysynthesis via renewal. Although the initial effects are minor, these contact phenomena initiate a shift toward an increasingly analytic, less polysynthetic morphology.
Keywords: Andean Spanish, auxiliary verb, language contact, Quechua, typological shift
Published online: 19 April 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.173.14hin
References

References

Adelaar, Willem F.H.
1977 Tarma Quechua: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2002 Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2006 Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Grammars in Contact: A Cross-linguistic Typology, A. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 1-66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Babel, Anna M.
2010 Contact and Contrast in Valley Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Babel, Anna & Pfänder, Stefan
2014 Doing copying: Why typology doesn’t matter to language speakers. In Congruence in Contact-induced Language Change: Language Families, Typological Resemblance, and Perceived Similarity, Juliane Besters-Dilger, Cynthia Dermarkar, Stefan Pfänder & Achim Rabus (eds), 239-257. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, Domingo A.
1965 Estado actual del quichua santiagueño. Tucumán, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.Google Scholar
Bruil, Martine
2008 Innovations in Ecuadorian Converb Systems. MA thesis, Leiden University.
Bybee, Joan
1998 The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society 34: 421‑35.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere, & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate
1992 Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In Diachronic Studies on the Languages of the Anabaptists [Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 17], Kate Burridge & Werner Enninger (eds), 199-241. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo
1976 Gramática quechua: Junín-Huanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
2003 Castellano Andino: Aspectos sociolingüísticos, pedagógicos y gramaticales. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter
1982 Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
1983 Switch reference in two Quechua languages. In Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds), 1-15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, David, Coombs, Heidi, & Weber, Robert
1976 Gramática quechua: San Martín. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan
2001 What language features can be ‘borrowed’? In Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 412-436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cusihuamán, Antonio
1976 Gramática quechua: Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2010 Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Anna María
2011 Spanish in contact with Quechua. In The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, Manuel Diaz-Campo (ed.), 323-352. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Godenzzi, Juan C., Pfänder, Stefan, Fernandez Mallat, Victor, & Dankel, Philipp
(eds) 2012 El español andino: Espacios comunicativos y cambios gramaticales. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haboud, Marleen
1998 Quichua y castellano en los Andes Ecuatorianos: Los efectos de un contacto prolongado. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 Language Contact and Grammatical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J.
2000 Características distintivas del quechua de Corongo [Serie Lingüística Peruana 50]. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
2002 The emergent substitutive construction in Quechua. In Proceedings from the Fifth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 13], Jeanie Castillo (ed.), 10-22. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
2009 Reordenamiento sintáctico en construcciones verbales analíticas del quechua por el contacto con el castellano. Lingüística 22: 187-201.Google Scholar
2011 Crossing Aspectual Frontiers: Emergence, Evolution, and Interwoven Semantic Domains in South Conchucos Quechua [University of California Publications in Linguistics 146]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hintz, Diane M.
2003 Word Order in South Conchucos Quechua. MA thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Kuteva, Tania
2001 Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F., & Fennig, Charles D.
(eds) 2013 Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edn. Dallas: SIL International. http://​www​.ethnologue​.comGoogle Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette
2007 Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4): 829-865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1992 External triggers and internal guidance in syntactic development: Coordinating conjunction. In Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change, Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds), 89-129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Divergence and Confluence: Typology, Diachrony, and Contact. Keynote address, Conference on Diversity and Universals in Language: The Consequences of Variation. Stanford University.
2005 Expanding the Explicable: Windfalls from an Iconicity Anomaly. Colloquium sponsored by the Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
2007 Grammar, contact and time. Journal of Language Contact THEMA 1: 144-167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012a Core argument patterns and deep genetic relations: Hierarchical systems in Northern California. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds), 257-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b Exuberant complexity: The interplay of morphology, syntax, and prosody in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. Linguistic Discovery 10(1): 1-21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012c Morphologies in contact: Form, meaning, and use in the grammar of reference. In Morphologies in Contact [Studia Typologica 10], Thomas Stolz, Martine Vanhove, Hitomi Otsuka & Anna Urdzu (eds), 13‑35. Berlin: Akademia Verlag.Google Scholar
2012d Questionable relatives. In Typological Aspects of Relative Clauses. A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 103], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada (eds), 269-300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A.
1978 Language contact. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 1: Method and Theory, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 93-122. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter
1977 Syntactic Developments in the Verb Phrase of Ecuadorian Quechua. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1996 Sounds Like Life: Sound-symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orconi, Eugenio
1987 Manuelito, El Oso. In Juan del Oso, David J. Weber (ed.), 211-237. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Pache, Matthias
2013 Surprise! … and its encoding in Kamsá and other languages of western South America. In Wege im Garten der Ethnologie: Zwischen dort und hier, Hanna Heinrich & Harald Grauer (eds), 203-221. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Quesada, Félix
1976 Gramática quechua: Cajamarca-Cañaris. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Liliana
2004 Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 147-162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Santo Tomás, Domingo
[1560]1995 Grammatica o arte de la lengua general de los Indios de los Reynos del Peru. Valladolid. (facsim. ed. 1951). Lima: Santa María.Google Scholar
Soto, Clodoaldo
1976 Gramática quechua: Ayacucho-Chanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gerald
2000 Estudios lingüísticos sobre Chachapoyas. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey
2001 Contact-induced typological change. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1640-1648. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence
1988 Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Torero, Alfredo
1964 Los dialectos quechuas. Anales Científicos de la Universidad Agraria 2:446‑78.Google Scholar
2002 Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e historia. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Waskosky, Kristine E.
1992 Affixes of Salasaca Quichua: With Special Attention to Derivational Affixes which Attach to Verbs. MA thesis, University of North Dakota.
Weber, David J.
1989 A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua [University of California Publications in Linguistics 112]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1953 Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar