Part of
Language Contact and Change in the Americas: Studies in honor of Marianne Mithun
Edited by Andrea L. Berez-Kroeker, Diane M. Hintz and Carmen Dagostino
[Studies in Language Companion Series 173] 2016
► pp. 315338
References (57)
References
Adelaar, Willem F.H. 1977. Tarma Quechua: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2002. Language Contact in Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic perspective. In Grammars in Contact: A Cross-linguistic Typology, A. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 1-66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Babel, Anna M. 2010. Contact and Contrast in Valley Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Babel, Anna & Pfänder, Stefan. 2014. Doing copying: Why typology doesn’t matter to language speakers. In Congruence in Contact-induced Language Change: Language Families, Typological Resemblance, and Perceived Similarity, Juliane Besters-Dilger, Cynthia Dermarkar, Stefan Pfänder & Achim Rabus (eds), 239-257. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bravo, Domingo A. 1965. Estado actual del quichua santiagueño. Tucumán, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.Google Scholar
Bruil, Martine. 2008. Innovations in Ecuadorian Converb Systems. MA thesis, Leiden University.
Bybee, Joan. 1998. The emergent lexicon. Chicago Linguistic Society 34: 421‑35.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere, & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate. 1992. Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In Diachronic Studies on the Languages of the Anabaptists [Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 17], Kate Burridge & Werner Enninger (eds), 199-241. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1976. Gramática quechua: Junín-Huanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
. 2003. Castellano Andino: Aspectos sociolingüísticos, pedagógicos y gramaticales. Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
. 1983. Switch reference in two Quechua languages. In Switch Reference and Universal Grammar [Typological Studies in Language 2], John Haiman & Pamela Munro (eds), 1-15. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coombs, David, Coombs, Heidi, & Weber, Robert. 1976. Gramática quechua: San Martín. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Curnow, Timothy Jowan. 2001. What language features can be ‘borrowed’? In Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance, Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 412-436. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cusihuamán, Antonio. 1976. Gramática quechua: Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W. 2010. Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Escobar, Anna María. 2011. Spanish in contact with Quechua. In The Handbook of Hispanic Sociolinguistics, Manuel Diaz-Campo (ed.), 323-352. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Godenzzi, Juan C., Pfänder, Stefan, Fernandez Mallat, Victor, & Dankel, Philipp (eds). 2012. El español andino: Espacios comunicativos y cambios gramaticales. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Haboud, Marleen. 1998. Quichua y castellano en los Andes Ecuatorianos: Los efectos de un contacto prolongado. Quito: Abya-Yala.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hintz, Daniel J. 2000. Características distintivas del quechua de Corongo [Serie Lingüística Peruana 50]. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
. 2002. The emergent substitutive construction in Quechua. In Proceedings from the Fifth Workshop on American Indigenous Languages [Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 13], Jeanie Castillo (ed.), 10-22. Santa Barbara CA: Department of Linguistics, University of California Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
. 2009. Reordenamiento sintáctico en construcciones verbales analíticas del quechua por el contacto con el castellano. Lingüística 22: 187-201.Google Scholar
. 2011. Crossing Aspectual Frontiers: Emergence, Evolution, and Interwoven Semantic Domains in South Conchucos Quechua [University of California Publications in Linguistics 146]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hintz, Diane M. 2003. Word Order in South Conchucos Quechua. MA thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Kuteva, Tania. 2001. Auxiliation: An Enquiry into the Nature of Grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul, Simons, Gary F., & Fennig, Charles D. (eds). 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 17th edn. Dallas: SIL International. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron & Sakel, Jeanette. 2007. Investigating the mechanisms of pattern replication in language convergence. Studies in Language 31(4): 829-865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1992. External triggers and internal guidance in syntactic development: Coordinating conjunction. In Internal and External Factors in Syntactic Change, Marinel Gerritsen & Dieter Stein (eds), 89-129. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Divergence and Confluence: Typology, Diachrony, and Contact. Keynote address, Conference on Diversity and Universals in Language: The Consequences of Variation. Stanford University.
. 2005. Expanding the Explicable: Windfalls from an Iconicity Anomaly. Colloquium sponsored by the Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.
. 2007. Grammar, contact and time. Journal of Language Contact THEMA 1: 144-167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012a. Core argument patterns and deep genetic relations: Hierarchical systems in Northern California. In Argument Structure and Grammatical Relations. A Crosslinguistic Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 126], Pirkko Suihkonen, Bernard Comrie & Valery Solovyev (eds), 257-294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012b. Exuberant complexity: The interplay of morphology, syntax, and prosody in Central Alaskan Yup’ik. Linguistic Discovery 10(1): 1-21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012c. Morphologies in contact: Form, meaning, and use in the grammar of reference. In Morphologies in Contact [Studia Typologica 10], Thomas Stolz, Martine Vanhove, Hitomi Otsuka & Anna Urdzu (eds), 13‑35. Berlin: Akademia Verlag.Google Scholar
. 2012d. Questionable relatives. In Typological Aspects of Relative Clauses. A Typological Overview [Typological Studies in Language 103], Bernard Comrie & Zarina Estrada (eds), 269-300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Edith A. 1978. Language contact. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 1: Method and Theory, Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 93-122. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Muysken, Pieter. 1977. Syntactic Developments in the Verb Phrase of Ecuadorian Quechua. Lisse: Peter de Ridder.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. 1996. Sounds Like Life: Sound-symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Orconi, Eugenio. 1987. Manuelito, El Oso. In Juan del Oso, David J. Weber (ed.), 211-237. Yarinacocha, Peru: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Pache, Matthias. 2013. Surprise! … and its encoding in Kamsá and other languages of western South America. In Wege im Garten der Ethnologie: Zwischen dort und hier, Hanna Heinrich & Harald Grauer (eds), 203-221. Sankt Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Quesada, Félix. 1976. Gramática quechua: Cajamarca-Cañaris. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Liliana. 2004. Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua Spanish bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 7(2): 147-162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Santo Tomás, Domingo. [1560]1995. Grammatica o arte de la lengua general de los Indios de los Reynos del Peru. Valladolid. (facsim. ed. 1951). Lima: Santa María.Google Scholar
Soto, Clodoaldo. 1976. Gramática quechua: Ayacucho-Chanca. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gerald. 2000. Estudios lingüísticos sobre Chachapoyas. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey. 2001. Contact-induced typological change. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1640-1648. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Torero, Alfredo. 1964. Los dialectos quechuas. Anales Científicos de la Universidad Agraria 2:446‑78.Google Scholar
. 2002. Idiomas de los Andes: Lingüística e historia. Lima: Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos.Google Scholar
Waskosky, Kristine E. 1992. Affixes of Salasaca Quichua: With Special Attention to Derivational Affixes which Attach to Verbs. MA thesis, University of North Dakota.
Weber, David J. 1989. A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua [University of California Publications in Linguistics 112]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar