Article published in:
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 85114
References

References

Baños Baños, José Miguel
(ed) 2009Sintaxis del latín clásico. Madrid: Liceus.Google Scholar
Bennet, Charles
1914Syntax of Early Latin, Vol. II. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Brucale, Luisa & Mocciaro, Egle
2011Continuity and discontinuity in the semantics of the Latin preposition per: A cognitive hypothesis. Language Typology and Universals 64(2): 148‒169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Samuel
1823A Praxis on the Latin Prepositions. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Cabrillana, Concepción
2011Purpose and result clauses. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax IV, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19‒92. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Calboli, Gualtiero
2009Latin syntax and Greek. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax 1, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 65-193. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1991Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dirven, René
1993Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual categories by means of English prepositions. In The Semantics of Prepositions, Cornelia Zelinski-Wibelt (ed.), 73-98. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine
1959Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: Histoire de mots. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Thomas, Francois
1964Syntaxe latine. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2003The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2, Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211-42. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Haudry, Jean
1968Les emplois double du datif et la fonction du datif indo-européen. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 63: 141-59.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike, Claudi & Hünnemeyer, Friederike
1991Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
van Hoecke, Willy
1996The Latin dative. In The Dative, Vol.1: Descriptive Studies [Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 2], William Van Belle & Willy Van Langendonck (eds), 3-38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, Johann & Szantyr, Anton
1965Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Stegmann, Carl
1912Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1993The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, Andrew Ortony (ed.), 202-251. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark
1999Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, Espenson, Jane, and Schwartz, Alan
1991Master Metaphor List (second edition). Cognitive Linguistics Group, University of California at Berkeley. http://​araw​.mede​.uic​.edu​/~alansz​/metaphor​/metaphorlist​.pdf.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
León Araúz, Pilar, Faber, Pamela & Montero Martínez, Silvia
2012Specialized language semantics. In A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language, Pamela Faber (ed.), 95-175. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Löfstedt, Einar
1911Philologischer Kommentar zur Peregrinatio Aetheriae: Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der lateinischen Sprache. Uppsala: Almqvist und Wiksell.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2001Syncretism and the classification of semantic roles. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 54(1): 35-51.Google Scholar
2005aPaths of semantic extension. From cause to beneficiary and purpose. In Historical Linguistics 2003 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 257], Michael Fortescue, Eva Skafte Jensen, Jens Erik Mogensen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 141‒57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005bPrepositions in cause expressions. In Papers on Grammar, Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 609‒619. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
2008Case in Cognitive Linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 136‒150. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010Adverbial phrases. In New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19‒108. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2014Plotting diachronic semantic maps: The role of metaphor. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 101-152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
1990Latin Syntax and Semantics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pokorny, Julius
1959Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Pottier, Bernard
1962Systématique des éléments de relation: Étude de morphosyntaxe structurale romane. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Prandi, Michele, Gross, Gaston & De Santis, Cristiana
2005La Finalità. Strutture concettuali e forme d’espressione in italiano. Florence: Olschki.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René
2007Cognitive English Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radden, Gunther
2003The metaphor time as space across languages. Zeitschrift für Interkulturellen Fremdsprachenunterricht 8(2-3): 226-239.Google Scholar
Radden, Günter
1985Spatial metaphors underlying prepositions of causality. In The Ubiquity of Metaphor [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 23], Wolf Paprotté & René Dirven (eds), 177-207. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Sintassi e formazione delle parole. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida
1995Case and semantic roles. In Handbook of Pragmatics, Jef Verschueren, Jan-Ola Östman, Jan Blommaert & Chris Bulcaen (eds), 1-32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996The Polish dative. In The Dative, Vol.1: Descriptive Studies [Case and Grammatical Relations Across Languages 2], William Van Belle & Willy Van Langendonck (eds), 341-394. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudzka-Ostyn, Brigida
2003Word Power: Phrasal Verbs and Compounds. A Cognitive ApproachBerlin. De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten
2009A Typology of Purpose Clauses [Typological Studies in Language 88]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010The role of benefactives and related notions in the typology of purpose clauses. In Benefactives and Malefactives [Typological Studies in Language 92], Fernando Zúñiga & Seppo Kittilä (eds), 121‒146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Serbat, Guy
1996Grammaire fondamentale du latin. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
1993Prepositions: Patterns of polysemization and strategies of disambiguation. In The Semantics of Prepositions, Cornelia Zelinsky-Wibbelt (ed.), 151-175. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Maria Esperanza
1989Caracterización funcional de los sintagmas preposicionales en latín: “pro - Abl., contra, aduersus, in + Ac”. In Actas del VII Congreso Español de Estudios Clásicos, Vol. 1, 609-616. Madrid: Universidad Complutense.Google Scholar
Tyler, Andrea & Evans, V.
2003The Semantics of English Prepositions. Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De la Villa, Jesus
1995Le contexte dans l’interprétation syntaxique de pro+ablatif. In De Usu: Etudes de syntaxe latine offertes en hommage a Maurius Lavency, Dominique Longreé (ed.), 329-344. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel
2008Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar