Article published in:
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 209236
References

References

Adam, Jean-Pierre
1982Groma et Chorobate. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome: Antiquité 94: 1003–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariño Gil, Enrique & Gurt, Josep
2001La inscripción catastral de Ilici. Ensayo de interpretación. Pyrenae: Revista de Prehistòria i Antiguitat de la Mediterrània Occidental 31-32: 223–26.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1958De la subjectivité dans le langage. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 55: 257–265.Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio
2008Weighty words, suspect speech: Fari in roman culture. Arethusa 41: 313–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Brian
1996Shaping the rural environment: Surveyors in ancient Rome. Journal of Roman Studies 86: 74–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.B.
2000The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Cavalieri-Manasse, Giuliana
2000Un document cadastral du complexe capitolin de Vérone. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 26: 198–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, Christopher
2007Before your very eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the ancient Theory of Ekphrasis. Classical Philology 102: 265–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chouquer, Gérard & Favory, François
2001L’arpentage romain: Histoire des textes, droit, techniques. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy
1997Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuomo, Serafina
2007Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeLaine, Janet
1996 De aquis suis? The ‘Commentarius’ of Frontinus’. In Les littératures techniques dans l’Antiquité romaine, Claude Nicolet (ed.), 117–45. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Dilke, Oswald
1971The Roman Land Surveyors: An Introduction to the Agrimensores. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.Google Scholar
Favory, François, Gonzalès, Antonio & Robin, Philippe
1994Témoignages antiques sur le bornage dans le monde romain. Revue archéologique du Centre de la France 33: 214–38.Google Scholar
Fowler, David & Taisbak, C. Marinus
1999Did Euclid’s circles have two kinds of radius? Historia Mathematica 26: 361–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gargola, Daniel
1995Lands, Laws & Gods: Magistrates & Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
2004The ritual of centuriation. In Augusto augurio: Rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes, Christoph Konrad (ed.), 123–48. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Gibson, Roy
1998Didactic poetry as ‘popular’ form: A study of imperatival expressions in Latin didactic verse and prose. In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Catherine Atherton (ed.), 67–98. Bari: Levante.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald
2007Distributed cognition without distributed knowing. Social Epistemology 21: 313–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gladigow, Burkhard
1992 Audi Juppiter, audite fines. Religionsgeschichtliche Einordnung von Grenzen, Grenzziehungen und Grenzbestätigungen. In Die Römische Feldmesskunst: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Okko Behrends & Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi (eds), 172–191. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon
1994The naïve and knowing eye: Ekphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world. In Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, Simon Goldhill & Robin Osborne (eds), 197–223. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gorges, Jean-Gérard
1993Nouvelle lecture du fragment de Forma d’un territoire voisin de Lacimurga. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez 29: 7–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillaumin, Jean-Yves
1994Géométrie grecque et agrimensorique romaine. La science comme justification d’une idéologie. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 20: 279–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hine, Harry
2009Subjectivity and objectivity in Latin scientific and technical literature. In Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing, Liba Chaia Taub & Aude Doody (eds), 13–30. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Hübner, Wolfgang
1992Himmel und Erdvermessun. In Die Römische Feldmesskunst: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Okko Behrends & Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi (eds), 140–71. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
1995Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Carel & Pollmann, Monique
2001On round numbers: Pragmatic aspects of numerical expressions. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 187–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lachmann, Karl
(ed.) 1848Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser, 2 vols. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2003Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Michael
2001Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Greek and Roman surveying and surveying instruments. In Ancient Perspectives: Maps and their Place in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, Richard Talbert (ed.), 129–62. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2006From personal deixis to spatial deixis: The semantic evolution of demonstratives from Latin to French. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 103–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Marc & Olesti Vila, Oriol
2001La sortitio de Ilici. Del documento epigráfico al paisaje histórico. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 27: 109–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Mark
2007Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piganiol, André
1962Les documents cadastraux de la colonie romaine d’Orange. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie
1993Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Roby, Courtney
2014Experiencing geometry in Roman surveyors’ texts. Nuncius 29(1): 9–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sáez Fernández, Pedro
1990Estudio sobre una inscripción catastral colindante con Lacimurga. Habis 21: 205–228.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter
1996Finances, figures and fiction. The Classical Quarterly 46: 222–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1989How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Staden, Heinrich
1994Author and authority: Celsus on the construction of a scientific self. In Tradición e Innovación de la Medicina latina de la Antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media Manuel Enrique Vázquez Buján (ed.), 103–17. Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
2001Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 305–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torelli, Mario
1966Un templum augurale d’età repubblicana a Bantia. Rendiconti della Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti 21: 293–315.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan & Rosch, Eleanor
1991The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth
2009Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Williams, Sandra & Power, Richard
2013Hedging and rounding in numerical expressions. Pragmatics & Cognition 21: 193–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar