Article published in:
Embodiment in Latin Semantics
Edited by William Michael Short
[Studies in Language Companion Series 174] 2016
► pp. 209–236

Embodiment in Latin technical texts

| Cornell University
In this chapter I analyze Latin textual representations of the engagements between body and world entailed in the technical tasks of laying out spaces in the landscape and orienting oneself within them, emphasizing how rhetorical techniques of enargeia or “vividness” give the reader a sense of being physically present in those spaces. Drawing principally on the works of the Roman surveyors and Frontinus’s De aquae ductu urbis Romae, I focus on the road and water networks, and on the surveyed landscapes of Roman settlements. I give particular attention to linguistic techniques that vividly render the manual activities used to reify these spaces, from the surveyor’s manipulation of his instruments to the creation and decoding of the landscape of boundary markers.
Keywords: directives, distributed cognition, enargeia, fictive motion, orientation, tacit knowledge
Published online: 11 May 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.174.08rob
References

References

Adam, Jean-Pierre
1982 Groma et Chorobate. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome: Antiquité 94: 1003–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ariño Gil, Enrique & Gurt, Josep
2001 La inscripción catastral de Ilici. Ensayo de interpretación. Pyrenae: Revista de Prehistòria i Antiguitat de la Mediterrània Occidental 31-32: 223–26.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile
1958 De la subjectivité dans le langage. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 55: 257–265.Google Scholar
Bettini, Maurizio
2008 Weighty words, suspect speech: Fari in roman culture. Arethusa 41: 313–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Brian
1996 Shaping the rural environment: Surveyors in ancient Rome. Journal of Roman Studies 86: 74–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J.B.
2000 The Writings of the Roman Land Surveyors: Introduction, Text, Translation and Commentary. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Cavalieri-Manasse, Giuliana
2000 Un document cadastral du complexe capitolin de Vérone. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 26: 198–200. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chinn, Christopher
2007 Before your very eyes: Pliny Epistulae 5.6 and the ancient Theory of Ekphrasis. Classical Philology 102: 265–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chouquer, Gérard & Favory, François
2001 L’arpentage romain: Histoire des textes, droit, techniques. Paris: Errance.Google Scholar
Clark, Andy
1997 Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008 Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuomo, Serafina
2007 Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
DeLaine, Janet
1996  De aquis suis? The ‘Commentarius’ of Frontinus’. In Les littératures techniques dans l’Antiquité romaine, Claude Nicolet (ed.), 117–45. Geneva: Fondation Hardt.Google Scholar
Dilke, Oswald
1971 The Roman Land Surveyors: An Introduction to the Agrimensores. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.Google Scholar
Favory, François, Gonzalès, Antonio & Robin, Philippe
1994 Témoignages antiques sur le bornage dans le monde romain. Revue archéologique du Centre de la France 33: 214–38.Google Scholar
Fowler, David & Taisbak, C. Marinus
1999 Did Euclid’s circles have two kinds of radius? Historia Mathematica 26: 361–364. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gargola, Daniel
1995 Lands, Laws & Gods: Magistrates & Ceremony in the Regulation of Public Lands in Republican Rome. Chapel Hill NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
2004 The ritual of centuriation. In Augusto augurio: Rerum humanarum et divinarum commentationes, Christoph Konrad (ed.), 123–48. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Gibson, Roy
1998 Didactic poetry as ‘popular’ form: A study of imperatival expressions in Latin didactic verse and prose. In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, Catherine Atherton (ed.), 67–98. Bari: Levante.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald
2007 Distributed cognition without distributed knowing. Social Epistemology 21: 313–320. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gladigow, Burkhard
1992  Audi Juppiter, audite fines. Religionsgeschichtliche Einordnung von Grenzen, Grenzziehungen und Grenzbestätigungen. In Die Römische Feldmesskunst: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Okko Behrends & Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi (eds), 172–191. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Goldhill, Simon
1994 The naïve and knowing eye: Ekphrasis and the culture of viewing in the Hellenistic world. In Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture, Simon Goldhill & Robin Osborne (eds), 197–223. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gorges, Jean-Gérard
1993 Nouvelle lecture du fragment de Forma d’un territoire voisin de Lacimurga. Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez 29: 7–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guillaumin, Jean-Yves
1994 Géométrie grecque et agrimensorique romaine. La science comme justification d’une idéologie. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 20: 279–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hine, Harry
2009 Subjectivity and objectivity in Latin scientific and technical literature. In Authorial Voices in Greco-Roman Technical Writing, Liba Chaia Taub & Aude Doody (eds), 13–30. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Hübner, Wolfgang
1992 Himmel und Erdvermessun. In Die Römische Feldmesskunst: interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu ihrer Bedeutung für die Zivilisationsgeschichte Roms, Okko Behrends & Luigi Capogrossi Colognesi (eds), 140–71. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin
1995 Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, Carel & Pollmann, Monique
2001 On round numbers: Pragmatic aspects of numerical expressions. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 8: 187–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lachmann, Karl
(ed.) 1848 Die Schriften der römischen Feldmesser, 2 vols. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
2008 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen
2003 Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Michael
2001 Surveying Instruments of Greece and Rome. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 Greek and Roman surveying and surveying instruments. In Ancient Perspectives: Maps and their Place in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and Rome, Richard Talbert (ed.), 129–62. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane
2006 From personal deixis to spatial deixis: The semantic evolution of demonstratives from Latin to French. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds), 103–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, Marc & Olesti Vila, Oriol
2001 La sortitio de Ilici. Del documento epigráfico al paisaje histórico. Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 27: 109–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Mark
2007 Theocritus and the Invention of Fiction. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Piganiol, André
1962 Les documents cadastraux de la colonie romaine d’Orange. Paris: Centre national de la recherche scientifique.Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie
1993 Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Roby, Courtney
2014 Experiencing geometry in Roman surveyors’ texts. Nuncius 29(1): 9–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016 Technical Ekphrasis in Greek and Roman Science and Literature: The Written Machine between Alexandria and Rome. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sáez Fernández, Pedro
1990 Estudio sobre una inscripción catastral colindante con Lacimurga. Habis 21: 205–228.Google Scholar
Scheidel, Walter
1996 Finances, figures and fiction. The Classical Quarterly 46: 222–238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1989 How performatives work. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 535–558. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Von Staden, Heinrich
1994 Author and authority: Celsus on the construction of a scientific self. In Tradición e Innovación de la Medicina latina de la Antigüedad y de la Alta Edad Media Manuel Enrique Vázquez Buján (ed.), 103–17. Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1994 The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
2001 Blended spaces and performativity. Cognitive Linguistics 11: 305–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torelli, Mario
1966 Un templum augurale d’età repubblicana a Bantia. Rendiconti della Accademia di archeologia, lettere e belle arti 21: 293–315.Google Scholar
Varela, Francisco J., Thompson, Evan & Rosch, Eleanor
1991 The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Webb, Ruth
2009 Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Williams, Sandra & Power, Richard
2013 Hedging and rounding in numerical expressions. Pragmatics & Cognition 21: 193–223. CrossrefGoogle Scholar