Part of
Exploring the Turkish Linguistic Landscape: Essays in honor of Eser Erguvanlı-Taylan
Edited by Mine Güven, Didar Akar, Balkız Öztürk and Meltem Kelepir
[Studies in Language Companion Series 175] 2016
► pp. 320
References (40)
References
Abrahamsson, Niclas. 1999. Vowel epenthesis of /sCC/ onsets in Spanish/Swedish interphonology: A longitudinal study. Language Learning 49: 473-508. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Jessica. 2001a. Preliminary typology of initial clusters in acquisition. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 15: 9-13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001b. The structure of /s/ sequences: Evidence from a disordered system. Journal of Child Language 28: 291-324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2005. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 5.4.12. <[URL]> (28 December 2014).Google Scholar
Broselow, Ellen. 1993. Transfer and universals in second language epenthesis. In Language Transfer in Language Learning [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 5], Susan M. Gass & Larry Selinker (eds), 71-86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, Walcir. 2008. The development of sC onset clusters in interlanguage: Markedness versus frequency effects. In Proceedings of the 9th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA) 2007, Roumyana Slabakova, Jason Rothman, Paula Kempchinsky & Elena Gavruseva (eds), 15-29. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Cardoso, Walcir & Liakin, Denis. 2009. When input frequency patterns fail to drive learning acquisition of sC onset clusters. In Recent Research in Second Language phonetics /phonology: Perception and Production, Michael A. Watkins, Andreia S. Rauber & Barbara O. Baptista (eds), 174-202. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Carlisle, Robert Stephen. 2006. The sonority cycle and the acquisition of complex onsets. In English with Latin Beat: Studies in Portuguese /Spanish –English Interphonology [Studies in Bilingualism 31], Barbara O. Baptista & Michael A. Watkins (eds), 105-137. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The influence of environment on vowel epenthesis in Spanish/English interphonology. Applied Linguistics 3: 15-23.Google Scholar
. 1992. Environment and markedness as interacting constraints on vowel epenthesis. In New Sounds 92: Proceedings of the 1992 Amsterdam Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, Jonathan Leather & Allan James (eds), 64-75. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. The modification of onsets in a markedness relationship: Testing the interlanguage structural conformity hypothesis. Language Learning 47: 327-361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlisle, Robert Stephen & Cutillas Espinosa, Juan Antonio. 2015. The production of /sC/ onsets in a markedness relationship: Investigating the Ontogeny and Phylogeny model with longitudinal data. In Unusual Productions in Phonology: Universal and Language –Specific Considerations, Mehmet Yavaş (ed.), 183-205. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
CELEX Lexical Database. <[URL]> (28 December 2014).
Clements, George N. 1990. The role of core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 1: Between Grammar and Physics of Speech, John Kingston & Mary Beckman (eds), 283-333. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 1990. Italian onset structure and the distribution of il and lo . Linguistics 28: 43-55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enochson, Kelly. 2014. The effect of continuance on the L2 production of L2 clusters. In Selected proceedings of the 5th Conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition-North America, Chia-Ying Chu, Caitlin E. Coughlin, Beatriz Lopez Prego, Utako Minai & Annie Tremblay (eds), 1-9. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Fikkert, Paula. 1994. On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Fleischhacker, Heidi. 2001. Cluster-dependent epenthesis asymmetries. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 7, Papers in Phonology 5: 71-116.Google Scholar
Giegerich, Heinz. 1992. English Phonology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gierut, Judith. 1999. Syllable onsets: Clusters and adjuncts in acquisition. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 42: 708-726. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrits, Eric. 2010. Acquisition of /s/ clusters in Dutch-speaking children with phonological disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 24(3): 199-209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerrits, Eric & Zumach, Anne. 2006. The acquisition of #sC clusters in Dutch. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 4: 218-230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goad, Heather. 2011. The representation of sC clusters. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elisabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 898-923. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hogg, Richard & McCully, Chris. 1987. Metrical Phonology: A Coursebook. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kager, Rene & Zonneveld, Wim. 1986. Schwa, syllables, and extrametricality in Dutch. The Linguistic Review 5: 197-221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1994. Phonology in Generative Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil & Simonsen, Hanne Gram. 2006. The acquisition of #sC clusters in Norwegian. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 4(3): 231-240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kucera, Henry & Francis, Winthrop Nelson. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present-day American English. Providence RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Parker, Steven. 2002. Quantifying the Sonority Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Rebello, Jeanne Teixeria & Baptista, Barbara. 2006. The influence of voicing on the production of initial /s/-clusters. In English with Latin Beat: Studies in Portuguese/Spanish Interphonology [Studies in Bilingualism 31], Barbara Baptista & Michael Alan Watkins (eds), 139-154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samarajiwa, Carlton & Abeysekara, R.M. 1964. Some pronunciation difficulties of Sinhalese learners of English as a foreign language. Language Learning 14: 45-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Singh, Rajendra. 1985. Prosodic adaptation in interphonology. Lingua 67: 269-282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Daniel. 1988. Review article: CV phonology: A generative theory of syllable. Language 64: 118-129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trommolen, Meike. 1984. The Syllable in Dutch: With Special Reference to Diminutive Formation. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Vitevitch, Michael & Luce, Paula. 2004. A web-based interface to calculate phonotactic probability for words and nonwords in English. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers 36(3): 481-487. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yavaş, Mehmet. 2006a. Sonority and the acquisition of #sC clusters, Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 4(3): 154-168.Google Scholar
Yavaş, Mehmet & Core, Cynthia. 2006b. Acquisition of #sC clusters in English-speaking children. Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders 4(3): 169-181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yavaş, Mehmet, Ben-David, Avivit, Gerrits, Ellen, Kristoffersen, Kristian Emil & Simonsen, Hanne Gram. 2008. Sonority and cross-linguistic acquisition of initial s-clusters. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 22(6): 421- 441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yavaş, Mehmet & McLeod, Sharynne. 2010. Acquisition of #sC onsets in English-speaking children with phonological disorders. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 24(3): 177-187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira. 1988. The obligatory contour principle and phonological rules: A loss of identity. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 65-100.Google Scholar