Article published in:
New Approaches to English Linguistics: Building bridges
Edited by Olga Timofeeva, Anne-Christine Gardner, Alpo Honkapohja and Sarah Chevalier
[Studies in Language Companion Series 177] 2016
► pp. 117–140

Dialect contact influences on the use of get and the get-passive

| Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich
get is a highly frequent and multifunctional English verb but has so far gone unnoticed in variationist studies of World Englishes. This study aims at exploring to what extent dialect contact contributes to the variation of get in British, Jamaican, and Singaporean English, in particular to variation in the frequencies of its word-forms and in the use of the get-passive. For that purpose, all tokens of get in the ICE (International Corpus of English) corpora of Great Britain, Jamaica, and Singapore were analysed for form and meaning. The results demonstrate that influence from the major standard varieties British and American English as well as substrate influence can be made responsible for the variation of get.
Keywords: GET-passive, word-forms, World Englishes, substrate influence, dialect contact
Published online: 01 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.177.05bru
References

References

Allsopp, Richard
(ed.) 2003[1996] Dictionary of Caribbean English Usage. Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.Google Scholar
Bao, Zhiming & Wee, Lionel
1999 The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes 18(1): 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2009 A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Leech, Geoffrey
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biewer, Carolin
2009 Passive constructions in Fiji English: A corpus-based study. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29), Andreas H. Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 361–377. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Burchfield, Robert W.
(ed.) 1996 The New Fowler’s Modern English Usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Yao, Xinyue
2013 Colloquial features in World Englishes. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(4): 479–505. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, David
1971 Toward a generative analysis of a post-creole speech continuum. In Pidginization and Creolization of Languages, Dell Hymes (ed.), 349-370. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1998 Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 4: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Deterding, David
2007 Singapore English. Edinburgh: EUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W.
2005 A Semantic Approach to English Grammar, 2nd edn. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Farquharson, Joseph T.
2013a Jamaican. In The Survey of Pidgin and Creole Languages, Vol. 1: English-based and Dutch-based Languages, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 81–91. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013b Jamaican structure dataset. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​apics​-online​.info​/contributions​/8 (27 November 2013).
Givón, Talmy
1993 English Grammar: A Function-Based Introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy & Yang, Lynne
1994 The rise of the English get-passive. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 119–149. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Stefan T.
2011 Corpus data in usage-based linguistics: What’s the right degree of granularity for the analysis of argument structure constructions? In Cognitive Linguistics: Convergence and Expansion [Human Cognitive Processing 32], Mario Brdar, Stefan T. Gries & Milena Žic Fuchs (eds), 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2013 Passive constructions. In The Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures, Susanne Maria Michaelis, Philippe Maurer, Martin Haspelmath & Magnus Huber (eds), 358–361. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela
1994 Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2): 237–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hübler, Axel
1998 The Expressivity of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, Marianne
2001 What corpora tell us about the grammaticalisation of voice in get-constructions. Studies in Language 25(1): 49–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin
(eds) 2013 The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​ewave​-atlas​.org (3 November 2014).
Lee, Nala Huiying, Ping, Ling Ai & Nomoto, Hiroki
2009 Colloquial Singapore English got: Functions and substratal influences. World Englishes 28(3): 293–318. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa
2012 Standards of English in South-East Asia. In Standards of English: Codified Varieties Around the World, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 274–293. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Lisa & Ansaldo, Umberto
2013a Colloquial Singapore English (Singlish). In The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​ewave​-atlas​.org​/languages​/57 (17 March 2014).
2013b Singlish structure dataset. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole Language Structures Online, Susanne Maria Michaelis et al. (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​apics​-online​.info​/contributions​/21 (27 November 2013).
Lindquist, Hans
2009 Corpus Linguistics and the Description of English. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2007 Varieties of English around the world: Collocational and cultural profiles. In Phraseology and Culture in English, Paul Skandera (ed.), 437–468. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Newman, John & Rice, Sally
2006 Transitivity schemas of English eat and drink in the BNC. In Corpora in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus-Based Approaches to Syntax and Lexis, Stefan T. Gries & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 225–260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Patrick, Peter
2013 Jamaican Creole. In The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​ewave​-atlas​.org​/languages​/27 (17 March 2014).
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sand, Andrea
2013 Jamaican English. In The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​ewave​-atlas​.org​/languages​/26 (17 March 2014).
Schneider, Edgar W.
2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties Around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John McHardy
1991 Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald
1993 Predication in Caribbean English Creoles [Creole Language Library 10].Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar