This paper studies from a synchronic-diachronic perspective the formal and semantic-discursive properties of adverbial expressions with a negative quantifier + wonder (henceforth ‘no’ wonder). They are used as mirative qualifiers which assess a proposition as ‘not surprising’, typically motivated by an explicit justification. As a result, the ‘no’ wonder adverbials function in a larger rhetorical structure, within which they convey the ‘causally justified expectedness’ of a state-of-affairs. We point out that in Present-day English, there are two types of ‘no’ wonder adverbials that are in different ways ‘outside of the clause’ they assess. On the one hand, there are disjunct uses of ‘no’ wonder, which in our data always occur in sentence-initial position, scoping over the following proposition, with the justification either preceding or following the miratively qualified proposition. On the other hand, there is the anaphoric adverbial ‘no’ wonder, which retrospectively qualifies a proposition in a preceding clause or sentence, but is itself part of a separate complex containing the justification. We argue that historically these two adverbial subtypes are related to different multi-clausal patterns involving clauses with be + no wonder: disjuncts to extraposition constructions and anaphoric adverbials to clauses that qualify a preceding clause. We also show that in Present-day spoken data the anaphoric mirative qualifier is prosodically more independent, while the disjunct uses tend to be prosodically integrated with the proposition.
Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
2005The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Prosodic Typology. The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Sun-Ah, Jun (ed.), 9-54. Oxford: OUP.
Boersma, Paul
2001Praat. A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5(9-10): 341-345.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2015Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.08. Retrieved 24 March 2015 from [URL]
Bolinger, Dwight
1947American English intonation, (review of K. L. Pike, The Intonation of American English 1945). American Speech 22(2):134-136.
2005A corpus of Late Modern English Texts. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.
De Smet, Hendrik
2008Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Gerunds, Participles and for…To-infinitives. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
De Smet, Hendrik
The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (Extended Version). University of Leuven. [URL]
Gimson, Alfred C
1989An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English, 4th edn. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A.K
1994[1985]An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Greaves, William S
2008Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Haselow, Alexander
2012Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23-27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 153-175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haselow, Alexander
2013Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47(2): 375-424.
Hopper, Paul & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Hulk, Aafke & van Kemenade, Ans
1993Subjects, nominative case, agreement, and functional heads. Lingua 89(2-3): 181–215.
Jacobs, Gilles
2014Clausal and Adverbial Modifiers with no Wonder: Mirative Qualification and its Justification. MA dissertation, University of Leuven.
2010Presupposition accomodation and language change. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 75-102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Svartvik, Jan
1990The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: LUP.
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank
2003York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. University of York. [URL]
Tench, Paul
1996The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassel.
Thompson, Paul & Nesi, Hilary
2001The British Academic Spoken English (BASE) corpus project. Language Teaching Research 5(3): 263–64.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1992Syntax. The Cambridge History of the English Language, I: Old English, Richard Hogg (ed.), 168-289. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & König, Ekkehard
1991The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. I: Focus on Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 189-218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
Tomlin, Russel
1985Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5: 85-122.
Van linden, An
2012Modal Adjectives: English Deontic and Evaluative Constructions in Diachrony and Synchrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van linden, An, Davidse, Kristin & Lennart, Matthijs
2016Miracles and mirativity: From lexical it’s a wonder to grammaticalised it’s no wonder in Old English. Leuvense Bijdragen 99.
Van linden, An & Van de Velde, Freek
2014(Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic-pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60: 226-250.
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2002The functional value of non-integration in clause combining: Interpersonal versus discursive independence. WORD 53(1): 37-65.
Visser, Frederik
1972An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vol. 2. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
2011Grammaticalization and prosody. In The Cambridge Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 331-354. Oxford: OUP.
Wichmann, Anne, Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Aijmer, Karin
2010How prosody reflects semantic change: A synchronic case study of ‘of course’. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 103-154. Berlin: Mouton.
2022. ‘Wonder’ Nouns and the Development of a Mirative Constructional Network: An Exercise in Semiotic Diachronic Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.