Article published in:Outside the Clause: Form and function of extra-clausal constituents
Edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Evelien Keizer and Arne Lohmann
[Studies in Language Companion Series 178] 2016
► pp. 125–156
Mirativity and rhetorical structure
The development and prosody of disjunct and anaphoric adverbials with ‘no’ wonder
This paper studies from a synchronic-diachronic perspective the formal and semantic-discursive properties of adverbial expressions with a negative quantifier + wonder (henceforth ‘no’ wonder). They are used as mirative qualifiers which assess a proposition as ‘not surprising’, typically motivated by an explicit justification. As a result, the ‘no’ wonder adverbials function in a larger rhetorical structure, within which they convey the ‘causally justified expectedness’ of a state-of-affairs. We point out that in Present-day English, there are two types of ‘no’ wonder adverbials that are in different ways ‘outside of the clause’ they assess. On the one hand, there are disjunct uses of ‘no’ wonder, which in our data always occur in sentence-initial position, scoping over the following proposition, with the justification either preceding or following the miratively qualified proposition. On the other hand, there is the anaphoric adverbial ‘no’ wonder, which retrospectively qualifies a proposition in a preceding clause or sentence, but is itself part of a separate complex containing the justification. We argue that historically these two adverbial subtypes are related to different multi-clausal patterns involving clauses with be + no wonder: disjuncts to extraposition constructions and anaphoric adverbials to clauses that qualify a preceding clause. We also show that in Present-day spoken data the anaphoric mirative qualifier is prosodically more independent, while the disjunct uses tend to be prosodically integrated with the proposition.
Published online: 03 October 2016
Beckman, Mary E., Hirschberg, Julia & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie
2001 Praat. A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5(9-10): 341-345.
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2015 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.08. Retrieved 24 March 2015 from http://www.praat.org/
Boye, Kasper & Harder, Peter
Brazil, David, Coulthard, Malcolm & Johns, Catherine
1980 Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.
Brinton, Laurel J.
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
1998 The British National Corpus. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=1810868
, Harper Collins. http://www.collinslanguage.com/content-solutions/wordbanks
1986 Intonation. Cambridge: CUP.
1975 The English Tone of Voice. Essays in Intonation, Prosody and Paralanguage. London: Arnold.
Davidse, Kristin, De Wolf, Simon & Van linden, An
Dehé, Nicole & Braun, Bettina
Dehé, Nicole & Wichmann, Anne
1993 English Historical Syntax: Verbal Constructions. London: Longman.
De Smet, Hendrik
2005 A corpus of Late Modern English Texts. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.
2008 Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Gerunds, Participles and for…To-infinitives. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
. The Corpus of Late Modern English Texts (Extended Version). University of Leuven. https://perswww.kuleuven.be/~u0044428/clmetev.htm
Gimson, Alfred C.
1989 An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English, 4th edn. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A.K.
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Greaves, William S.
2008 Intonation in the Grammar of English. London: Equinox.
Halliday, Michael A.K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
2012 Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In English Historical Linguistics 2010. Selected Papers from the Sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 16), Pécs, 23-27 August 2010 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 325], Irén Hegedüs & Alexandra Fodor (eds), 153-175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hulk, Aafke & van Kemenade, Ans
2014 Clausal and Adverbial Modifiers with no Wonder: Mirative Qualification and its Justification. MA dissertation, University of Leuven.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann
2000 Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn. University of Pennsylvania. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCME2-RELEASE-3/index.html
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren
2004 Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English. University of Pennsylvania. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCEME-RELEASE-2/index.html
Martin, James R.
1983 Conjunction. The logic of English text. In Micro and Macro Connexity of Texts, János Petöfi & Emel Sözer (eds), 1-72. Hamburg: Buske.
Mann, William & Thompson, Sandra A.
1988 Rhetorical structure theory. Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8: 243-281.
McGregor, William B.
1997 Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Nelson, Gerard, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas
O’Connor, Joseph. D. & Arnold, Gordon F.
1961 Intonation of Colloquial English: A Practical Handbook, 1st edn. London: Longmans.
2013 Key Concepts in Phonetics and Phonology. Houndmills: Palgrave.
Parkes, Malcolm B.
1992 Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Aijmer, Karin
Schwenter, Scott A. & Waltereit, Richard
1990 The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: LUP.
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank
2003 York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose. University of York. http://www-users.york.ac.uk/~lang22/YCOE/YcoeHome.htm
1996 The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassel.
Thompson, Paul & Nesi, Hilary
2001 The British Academic Spoken English (BASE) corpus project. Language Teaching Research 5(3): 263–64.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1992 Syntax. The Cambridge History of the English Language, I: Old English, Richard Hogg (ed.), 168-289. Cambridge: CUP.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & König, Ekkehard
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
1985 Foreground-background information and the syntax of subordination. Text 5: 85-122.
Van linden, An
Van linden, An, Davidse, Kristin & Lennart, Matthijs
2016 Miracles and mirativity: From lexical it’s a wonder to grammaticalised it’s no wonder in Old English. Leuvense Bijdragen 99.
Van linden, An & Van de Velde, Freek
1972 An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vol. 2. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
2012 On the origins of grammaticalization and other types of language change in discourse strategies. In Grammaticalization and Language Change. New Reflections Ekkehard [Studies in Language Companion Series 130], Kristin Davidse, Tine Breban, Lieselotte Brems & Tanja Mortelmans (eds), 51-72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2011 Grammaticalization and prosody. In The Cambridge Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 331-354. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by other publications
No author info given
Lewis, Diana M.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 july 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.