Cover not available
Part of
Argument Realisation in Complex Predicates and Complex Events: Verb-verb constructions at the syntax-semantic interface
Edited by Brian Nolan and Elke Diedrichsen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 180] 2017
► pp. 278–304

Chapter 10
Verb-verb compounds and argument structure in Tepehua

| SIL International and University of North Dakota
In Tepehua (Totonacan, Mexico), verb-verb constructions are of two kinds: verb-verb compounds and verb-as-operator constructions. In verb-verb compounds, the second verb is the head of the construction and the two verbs may or may not be separated by inflection. These compounds parallel adverb-incorporation constructions and are subject to a constraint: if the first verb is transitive, the second verb must also be formally transitive, even if its semantic contribution is intransitive. Beyond this transitivity constraint, verb selection is only restricted by pragmatics. In the verb-as-operator constructions, the head verb is the first member of the construction, the modifying verb is a member of a closed class, and it may not be separated from the head verb by inflection. In some instances, the second verb functions as an operator specifying aspect or position. The complex predicate construction has made it possible for what was historically a verb root, tʃuqu, to become a very common productive suffix in Tepehua.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Verb-verb compounds
    • 2.1Kinds of compounds
    • 2.2Transitivity of compounds
  • 3.Compounding in Tepehua
  • 4.Verb-verb constructions in Tepehua
  • 5.Right-headed verb-verb compounds
  • 6.Left-headed verb-verb constructions
  • 7.V2 as inflection
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 26 January 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.180.10wat
References (27)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2006. Serial verb constructions in typological perspective’. In Serial Verb Constructions: A Cross-linguistic Typology, [Explorations in Linguistic Typology 2], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & Robert M.W. Dixon (eds), 1–68. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Amberber, Mengistu, Baker, Brett & Harvey, Mark. 2010. Introduction: complex predicates. In Complex Predicates Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aschmann, Herman P. 1962. Vocabulario totonaco de la Sierra. México, DF: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1989. Object sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 513–553.Google Scholar
Beck, David. 2011. Lexical, quasi-inflectional, and inflectional compounding in Upper Necaxa Totonac. In Multi-verb Constructions: A View from the Americas, Alexandra Aikhenvald & Pieter Muysken (eds), 63–106. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 1993. The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu. PhD dissertation, Stanford University CA.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 1997. Argument sharing in serial verb constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 461–497.Google Scholar
Dowty, David J. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1982. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica 6: 222–254.Google Scholar
Fukushima, Kazuhiko. 2005. Lexical V-V compound in Japanese: Lexicon vs. syntax. Language 81: 568–612. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2015. The serial verb construction: Comparative concept and cross-linguistic generalizations. <[URL]> (19 May 2015).
Kageyama, Taro. 2009. Isolateː Japanese. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 512–526. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
MacKay, Carolyn & Trechsel, Frank. 2008. Tepehua de Pisaflores, Veracruz. México DF: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1991. The Indo-Aryan Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Yo. 1996. Complex Predicates in Japaneseː A Syntactic and semantic Study of the Notion ‘Word’. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
McFarland, Teresa Ann. 2009. The Phonology and Morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Narasimhan, B. 1998. A lexical semantic explanation for ‘quirky’ case marking in Hindi. Studia Linguistica 52: 48–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, Kunio & Ogawa, Yoshiki. 2014. Auxiliation, atransitivity, and transitivity harmony in Japanese V-V compounds. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences 20: 71–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, Aileen A. & Bishop, Ruth G. 1974. Diccionario Totonaco de Xicotepec de Juárez. México DF: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
Smythe Kung, Susan. 2007. A Descriptive Grammar of Huehuetla Tepehua. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 2005. Exploring the Syntax-semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wald, Bemni & Besserman, Lawrence. 2003. The emergence of the verb-verb compound in twentieth century English and twentieth century linguistics. In Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective, Donka Minkova & Robert P. Stockwell (eds), 417–448. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Watters, James K. 1988. Topics in Tepehua Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
1996. Frames and semantics of applicatives in Tepehua. Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods [Cognitive Linguistics Research 6] Eugene H. Casad (ed.), 971–996. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013a. Tlachichilco Tepehua: Semantics and function of verb valence change. Workshop on Verb Valency Change. Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo.Google Scholar
2013b. Transitivity, constructions, and the projection of argument structure in RRG. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Nolan, Brian & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 23–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmer, Karl. 1971. Some general observations about nominal compounds. Working Papers on Language Universals 5C:1–21. Stanford CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar