Cover not available
Part of
Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches
Edited by Valentina Vapnarsky and Edy Veneziano
[Studies in Language Companion Series 182] 2017
► pp. 1–31

Lexical Polycategoriality: Cross-linguistic, cross-theoretical and language acquisition approaches

An introduction

| LESC/EREA-CNRS & Université Paris Nanterre
| MoDyCo & LPPS, Université Paris Descartes
Article outline
  • Cross-linguistic and cross-theoretical analysis of polycategoriality
  • 1.Polycategoriality: Descriptive and theoretical issues
    • 1.1Identical or zero-related forms and their interpretation
    • 1.2What are the relevant criteria?
      • 1.2.1Distributional properties
      • 1.2.2Syntactic function
      • 1.2.3Semantic predictability
    • 1.3At which level(s) does polycategoriality apply?
      • 1.3.1Cross-linguistic morphosyntactic properties and polycategoriality
      • 1.3.2Diachronic changes
  • 2.Lexical categories in acquisition
  • 3.The contributions to this volume
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.182.01val
References (95)
References
Aksu-Koç, A. 1998. The role of input vs. universal predispositions in the emergence of tense-aspect morphology: Evidence from Turkish. First Language 18: 255–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambridge, B., Pine, J. & Lieven, E. 2014. Child language acquisition: Why universal grammar doesn't help. Language 90(3): e53–e90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arad, M. 2005. Roots and Patterns. Hebrew Morpho-syntax. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Armon-Lotem, S. & Berman, R. A. 2003. The emergence of grammar: Early verbs and beyond. Journal of Child Language 30: 845–877. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M. 2003. Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 102]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassano, D. 2000. Early development of nouns and verbs in French: Exploring the interface between lexicon and grammar. Journal of Child Language 27: 521–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, L. & Varela, S. (eds). 2005. Approaches to Conversion/Zero derivation. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Becquey, C. 2014. Diasystème, diachronie: Etudes comparées dans les langues cholanes. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics). <[URL]> Google Scholar
Berman, R. A. & Armon-Lotem, S. 1996. How grammatical are early verbs? In Actes du Colloque International sur L’acquisition de la Syntaxe en Langue Maternelle et en Langue Étrangère, C. Martinot (ed.), 17–59. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Bernal, S., Lidz, J., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A. 2007. Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development 3: 325–341. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bisang, W. 2008. Precategoriality and argument structure. In Archaic Chinese, Constructional Reorganization [Constructional Approaches to Languages 5], J. Leino (ed.), 55–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L. 1971. Why not pivot grammar? Journal of Speech and Disorder 36: 40–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1973. One Word at a Time. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bloom, L. & Harner, L. 1989. On the developmental contour of child language: A reply to Smith & Weist. Journal of Child Language 16: 207–215. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bottari, P., Cipriani, P. & Chilosi, A. M. 1993–1994. Protosyntactic devices in the acquisition of Italian free morphology. Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics 3: 327–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braine, M. D. S. 1963. The ontogeny of English phrase structure: The first phase. Language 39: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1976. Children's first word combinations. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 41(1, serial no. 164). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brusini, P., de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Gutman, A., Cauvet, E., Millotte, S., Amsili, P. & Christophe, A. To appear. Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, Contexts, and Learners, M. Hickmann, E. Veneziano & H. Jisa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Carter, R. 2006. Polycategoriality and predictability: Problems and prospects. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 343–390. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2010. What have we learned, and what do we need to do to learn more about lexical categories? Paper presented at the International Conference on Polycategoriality “How Flexible are Lexical Categories ?” , 4–6 October, ENS, Paris.
Chung, S. 2012. Are lexical categories universal? The view from Chamorro. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 1–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. V. 1987. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Mechanisms of language acquisition, B. MacWhinney (ed), 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. 1969. Sur l'étude du langage enfantin. Enfance 3(3–4): 181–249.Google Scholar
. 1969. Sur l'étude du langage enfantin. Enfance 22(3–4): 203–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 1991. Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations: The Cognitive Organization of Information. Chicago IL: University Press of Chicago.Google Scholar
. 2000. Parts of speech as typological universals and language particular categories. In Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes, P. M. Vogel & B. Comrie (eds), 65–102. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Word classes, parts of speech and syntactic argumentation (Commentary on Evans and Osada, “Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes”). Linguistic Typology 9: 431–41.Google Scholar
Croft, W. & van Lier, E. 2012. Language universal without universal categories. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 57–72.Google Scholar
Danziger, E. 2008. A person, a place, or a thing? Whorfian consequences of syntactic bootstrapping in Mopan Maya. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure, M. Bowerman & P. Brown (eds), 29–48. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Demuth, K. 2001. A prosodic approach to filler syllables. Journal of Child Language 28: 246–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Don, J. 2005. On conversion, relisting and zero derivation. SKASE 2(2): 2–16. <[URL]> Google Scholar
Embick, D. 2010. Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. & Osada, T. 2005. Mundari: The myth of a language without word classes. Linguistic Typology 9(3): 351–390.Google Scholar
Franchetto, B. 2006. Are Kuikuro roots lexical categories? In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 33–68. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2010. The ergativity effect in Kuikuro (Southern Carib, Brazil). In Ergativity in Amazonia [Typological Studies in Language 89], S. Gildea & F. Queixalós (eds), 121–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., Sebastian, E. & Soto, P. 1999. The early acquisition of Spanish verbal morphology: Across-the-board or piecemeal knowledge? International Journal of Bilingualism 3: 133–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gerken, L. & McIntosh, B. 1993. Interplay of function morphemes and prosody in early language. Developmental Psychology 29(3): 448–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gildea, S. O. 1998. On Reconstructing Grammar: Comparative Cariban Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gleitman, L. R. 1990. The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1: 3–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gold, E. M. 1967. Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10: 447–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, J. 1981. Form, function, and the language acquisition device. In The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition, C. L. Baker & J. J. McCarthy (eds), 165–182. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Grégoire, A. 1937. L’apprentissage du langage. Vol. 1. Paris: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
. 1947. L’apprentissage du langage. Vol. 2. Paris: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Guillaume, P. 1927. Le développement des éléments formels dans le langage de l’enfant. Journal de Psychologie Normale et Pathologique 24: 203–229.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Marantz, A. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], A. Carnie & H. Harley (eds), 275–288. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2012. Escaping ethnocentrism in the study of word-class universals. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 91–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, K. 1992. Non-verbal Predication: Theory, Typology, Diachrony. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Prototypical and non-prototypical noun phrases in functional discourse grammar. In The Noun Phrase in Functional Discourse Grammar, D. García Velasco & J. Rijkhoff (eds), 43–62. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoff-Ginsburg, E. & Shatz, M. 1982. Linguistic input and the child's acquisition of language. Psychological Bulletin 92: 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houis, M. 1981. Les schèmes d’énoncé en bambara. Mandenkan 1: 17–24.Google Scholar
Höhle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A. & Schmitz, M. 2004. Functional elements in infants' speech processing: The role of determiners in the syntactic categorization of lexical elements. Infancy 5: 341–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Katz, N., Baker, E. & Macnamara, J. 1974. What’s in a name? A study of how children learn common and proper names. Child Development 45: 469–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kerleroux, F. 1996. La coupure invisible. Lille: Septentrion, Presses Universitaires de Lille.Google Scholar
. 2000. Identification d?un procédé morphologique: La conversion. Faits de Langue 14: 89–100.Google Scholar
Küntay, A. & Slobin, D.I. 2002. Putting interaction back into child language: Examples from Turkish. Psychology of Language and Communication 6: 5–14.Google Scholar
Laaha, S., Gillis, S., Kilani-Schoch, M., Korecky-Kröll, K., Xanthos, A. & Dressler, W. U. 2007. Weakly inflecting languages: French, Dutch, and German. In Typological Perspectives on the Acquisition of Noun and Verb Morphology [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 112], S. Laaha & S. Gillis (eds), 21–33. Antwerp: Antwerp University.Google Scholar
Launey, M. 1994. Une grammaire omniprédicative. Paris: CNRS-Editions.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. 2008. Roots, stems and word classes. Studies in Languages 32(3): 546–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, R. 2006. The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16: 247–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieven, E. 2014. First language development: A usage-based perspective on past and current research. Journal of Child Language 41: 48–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Lier, E. 2012. Reconstructing multifunctionality. Theoretical Linguistics 38(1–2): 119–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lléo, C. 1997. Filler syllables, proto-articles and early prosodic constraints in Spanish and German. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge, Representation, and Processing [Proceedings GALA], A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds), 251–256. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Lois, X. 2011. Roots and patterns in Yucatecan languages. In Proceedings of Formal Approaches to Mayan Linguistics [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 63], K. Shklovksy, P. Mateo Pedro & J. Coon (eds), 147–169. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Lois, X. & Vapnarsky, V. 2006. Introduction. In Lexical Categories and Root Classes in Amerindian Languages, X. Lois & V. Vapnarsky (eds), 1–30. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Luuk, E. 2009. The noun/verb and predicate/argument structures. Lingua 119: 1707–1727. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacNamara, J. 1982. Names for Things. A Study of Human Learning. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, A. 1997. No escape from syntax. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, A. Dimitriadis & I. Siegel (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Miller, W. & Ervin, S. 1964. The development of grammar in child language. In The Acquisition of Language [Child Development Monographs 29], U. Belugi & R. Brown (eds). Chicago IL: Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. & Menn, L. 1993. False starts and filler-syllables: Ways to learn grammatical morphemes. Language 69: 742–777. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. 1984. Language Learnability and Language Development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pizzuto, E. & Caselli, M. C. 1992. The acquisition of Italian morphology: Implications for models of language development. Journal of Child Language 19: 491–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rijkhoff, J. & van Lier, E. (eds). 2013. Flexible Word Classes: A Typological Study of Underspecified Parts-of-speech. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robert, S. (ed). 2003. Perspectives synchroniques sur la grammaticalisation. Polysémie, transcatégorialité et échelles syntaxiques. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Rumsey, A., San Roque, L., & Schieffelin, B. 2013. The acquisition of ergative marking in Kaluli, Ku Waru and Duna (Trans New Guinea). In The Acquisition of Ergativity, E.. Bavin and S. Stoll (eds), 133–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. M. 1999. The nominalist theory of Eskimo: A case study of scientific self-deception. International Journal of American Linguistics 65(4): 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schieffelin, B. B. 1985. The acquisition of Kaluli. In The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition, Vol. 1, D. Slobin (ed.), 525–593. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
. 1990. The Give and Take of Everyday Life: Language Socialization of Kaluli Children. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Scholz, B. C. 2004. Gold's theorems and the logical problem of language acquisition. Journal of Child Language 31: 959–961. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, R., Werker, J. & Cutler, A. 2006. Recognition and representation of function words in English-learning infants. Infancy 10: 187–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, R. & Lepage, M. 2008. The effect of functional morphemes on word segmentation in pre-verbal infants. Developmental Science 11(3): 407–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, R. & Melançon, A. 2010. Syntactic categorization in French-learning infants. Infancy 15: 517–533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D.I. 1973. Cognitive prerequisites for the development of grammar. In Studies of Child Language Development, C. A. Ferguson & D. I. Slobin (eds), 175–208. New York NY: Holt Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A. (eds). 1977. Talking to Children: Language Input and Acquisition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. 1992. First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vapnarsky, V. & Haag, M. (org). 2009. Workshop ‘Typological Perspectives on Polycategoriality’ , ALT 8, July, Berkeley CA.
Vapnarsky, V. & Lois, X. 2009. Morphosyntactic and semantic issues on polycategoriality in Yucatecan Mayan languages. Talk presented at Workshop ‘Typological Perspectives on Polycategoriality’ , ALT 8, July, Berkeley CA.
Veneziano, E. 2004. The emergence of expressive options in early child language: A constructivist account. In Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, D. Ravid & H. Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds), 203–218. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C. In press. Retrieving meaning from noun and verb grammatical contexts: Interindividual variation among 2- to 4-year-old French-speaking children. In Sources of Variation in First Language Acquisition: Languages, Contexts, and Learners, M. Hickmann, E. Veneziano & H. Jisa (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Veneziano, E. & Sinclair, H. 2000. The changing status of 'filler syllables' on the way to grammatical morphemes. Journal of Child Language 27: 461–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veneziano, E. & Parisse, C. 2011. Retrieving the meaning of words from syntactic cues: A comprehension study. XIIIth International Conference on the Study of Child Language , Montreal, Canada.
Waxman, S. R., Lidz, J. L., Braun, I. E. & Lavin, T. 2009. Twenty four-month-old infants' interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology 59(1): 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wexler, K. & Culicover, P. 1980. Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar