Cover not available
Part of
Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017
► pp. 53–78

Imperatives and evidentiality in Innu

| Université du Québec à Montréal

Languages with a rich morphology such as Innu, an aboriginal language of Canada, which clearly mark phenomena that are less obvious in analytic languages, have contributed significantly to our understanding of language in several domains. Innu is of particular interest for the typology of imperatives because the imperative in this language is more than just a grammatical mood: it has three different paradigms of specialized imperative verbal forms with specific semantic overtones. The so-called indirect imperative paradigm is the focus of the present chapter. It is a type of absential imperative, where the action is expected to be performed in the absence of the speaker. We argue that it actually expresses evidentiality. It is a type of imperative which is not very well-known: it seems to be rare cross-linguistically and difficult to demonstrate. The analysis of the Innu imperative here sheds new light on the issue.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Key characteristics of the inflectional verb system of Innu
    • 2.1Three sets of conjugations
    • 2.2Moods and modalities
    • 2.3Evidentiality
  • 3.Directive strategies
    • 3.1Non-specialized forms
      • 3.1.1Tshe + conjunct
      • 3.1.2Verbless sentences
    • 3.2Specialized forms
  • 4.An evidential imperative
    • 4.1Previous analyses of imperative 3
    • 4.2Our analysis of imperative 3
    • 4.3Argument in favor of our analysis
      • 4.3.1Evidentiality in imperatives in general
      • 4.3.2Evidentiality in imperatives in Innu
      • 4.3.3Is the imperative a mood or a speech act?
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.02bar
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y
2006 Evidentiality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010 Imperatives and Commands. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B
1986 Evidentials, paths of change and mental maps: Typologically regular asymmetries. In Evidentiality. The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, Wallace Chafe & Johanna Nichols (eds), 273–312. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Baraby, Anne-Marie
1985 Aspects de la morphologie des flexions verbales du montagnais de Sheshatshit. MA dissertation, Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
2004 Guide de conjugaisons en langue innue. Sept-Îles: Institut culturel et éducatif Montagnais.Google Scholar
2009 Un impératif indirect en innu, Paper presented at the 41st Algonquian Conference , Montréal, October.
Baraby, Anne-Marie & Junker, Marie-Odile
2014 Conjugaisons des verbes innus. [URL] (17 March 2015).
Birjulin, Leonid A. & Xrakovskij, Victor S
2001 Imperative sentences: Theoretical problems. In Xrakovskij (ed.), 3–54.Google Scholar
Bhat, D. N. S
1999 The Prominence of Tense, Aspect and Mood [Studies in Language Companion Series 49]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chung, Sandra & Timberlake, Alan
1985 Tense, aspect and mood. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. III, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 203–258. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Clarke, Sandra
1982 North West River (Sheshatshit) Montagnais. A Grammatical Sketch. Ottawa: National Museum of Man.Google Scholar
Dolinina, Inga B
2001 The imperative paradigm: Meaning and forms. In Xrakovskij (ed.), 501–509.Google Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn
1984 Le traitement de l’information chez les Montagnais. Recherches amérindiennes au Québec 1(4): 24–35.Google Scholar
1986 Entre le rêve et la réalité: Le mode subjectif en montagnais. In Actes dudix-septième Congrès des Algonquinistes, William Cowan (ed.), 101–120. Ottawa: Carleton University.Google Scholar
2005 The epistemic dimension of modality in Innu-Montagnais. Paper presented at the 37th Algonquian Conference , Gatineau, October.
2014 Grammaire de la langue innue. Quebec: Presses de l’Université du Québec.Google Scholar
Drapeau, Lynn & Lambert-Brétière, Renée
2012 Clause chaining in Innu. Paper presented at the 44th Algonquian Conference , Chicago, October.
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness. Theoretical and Empirical Foundations, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ford, Alan & Bacon, Joséphine
1978 Cours programmé d’une langue. Langue montagnaise. Montreal: Université de Montréal.Google Scholar
Gruzdeva, Ekaterina
2001 Imperative sentences in Nivkh. In Victor S. Xrakovskij (ed.), 59–77.Google Scholar
Krejnovič, Eruxim A
1979 Nivikhskij jazyk (The Nivkh language). In Jazyki Azii i Afriki: III (Languages of Asia and Africa), 295–329. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Marguerite & Clarke, Sandra
1981 Dialect relations in Cree / Montagnais / Naskapi: Verb paradigms. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 135–192.Google Scholar
Mailhot, José, MacKenzie, Marguerite & Junker, Marie-Odile
(eds) 2013 Online Innu dictionary. [URL] (19 March 2015).Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne
1999 The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R
2001 Mood and Modality. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shipley, William F
1964 Maidu Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
St-Onge André, Anne-Marie
1997 An-Mani utipatshimunissima (Anne-Marie’s little stories). Sept-Îles: Institut culturel et éducatif Montagnais.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan, Dobrushina, Nina & Goussev, Valentin
2013 The imperative-hortative systems. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (20 March 2015).Google Scholar
Xrakovskij, Victor S
(ed.) 2001 Typology of Imperative Constructions. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Willett, Thomas
1988 A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticization of evidentiality. Studies in Language 12(1): 51–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
2018. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.