Chapter published in:
Language Contact and Change in Mesoamerica and Beyond
Edited by Karen Dakin, Claudia Parodi and Natalie Operstein
[Studies in Language Companion Series 185] 2017
► pp. 264300
References
Bartholomew, Doris
1980Otomanguean influence on Pochutla Aztec. International Journal of American Linguistics 46: 106–116. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beekman, Christopher S.
2012El Grillo and epilogue. The reestablishment of community and identity in far western Mexico. Invited paper presented as part of a session organized for the 77th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Memphis TN.
2015Causes and consequences of migration in epiclassic northern Mesoamerica. In Migration and Disruptions: Toward a Unified Theory of Ancient and Contemporary Migrations, Brenda Baker & Takeyuki Tsuda (eds), 73–96. Gainesville FL: University Press of Florida. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beekman, Christopher S. & Christensen, Alexander F.
2003Controlling for doubt and uncertainty through multiple lines of evidence: A new look at the Mesoamerican Nahuat migrations. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 10: 111–164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beller, Richard & Beller, Patricia
1979Huasteca Nahuatl. In Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 2: Modern Aztec Grammatical Sketches, Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), 200–236. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Boas, Franz
1917El dialecto mexicano de Pochutla, Oaxaca. International Journal of American Linguistics 1: 9–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, Lyle & Langacker, Ronald W.
1978Proto-Aztecan vowels. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: Pt. I, 85–102; Pt. II, 197–210; Pt. III, 262–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canger, Una
1980Five Studies Inspired by Nahuatl Verbs in -oa [Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 19]. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
1988Nahuatl dialectology: A survey and some suggestions. International Journal of American Linguistics 54: 28–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Mexicanero de la Sierra Madre Occidental. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
2011El nahuatl urbano de Tlatelolco/Tenochtitlan, resultado de convergencia entre dialectos. Con un esbozo brevísimo de la historia de los dialectos. Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl 42: 243–258.Google Scholar
Canger, Una & Dakin, Karen
1985An inconspicuous basic split in Nahuatl. International Journal of American Linguistics 54: 258–261.Google Scholar
Carot, Patricia & Hers, Marie-Areti
2006La gesta de los toltecas chichimecas y de los purépechas en las tierras de los antiguos pueblo ancestrales. In Las vías del noroeste, I: Una macrorregión indígena americana, 47–82. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas.Google Scholar
Casad, Eugene H.
1984Cora. In Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Studies, Vol. 4: Southern Uto-Aztecan Grammatical Sketches, Ronald W. Langacker (ed.), 151–459. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Ciudad Real, Antonio
1993Tratado curioso y docto de las grandezas de la Nueva España: Relación breve y verdadera de algunas cosas de las muchas que sucedieron al padre fray Alonso Ponce en las provincias de la Nueva España, siendo comisario general de aquellas partes, 2 Vols, J. García Quintana & V. M. Castillo Farreras (eds). Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Cortés y Zedeño, Gerónimo Thomás de Aquino
1765Arte, vocabulario, y confessionario en el idioma mexicano, como se usa en el Obispado de Guadalaxara. Puebla.Google Scholar
Cortina-Borja, Mario, & Leopoldo Valiñas C.
1989Some remarks on Uto-Aztecan classification. International Journal of American Linguistics 55: 214–239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dakin, Karen
1970Fieldnotes, North Morelos Nahuatl (Tepoztlán, Santa Catarina Zacatepec).Google Scholar
1980Commentary on Wick Miller’s ‘The internal classification of Uto-Aztecan based on lexical evidence’, Symposium on Uto-Aztecan Historical Linguistics, Linguistic Institute, Albuquerque, June.Google Scholar
1982La evolución fonológica del protonáhuatl. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas.Google Scholar
1983Proto-Aztecan vowels and Pochutec: An alternative analysis. International Journal of American Linguistics 49: 196–203. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1990El origen de la ƛ en náhuatl: reconsideraciones. Paper presented at the IIº Coloquio Swadesh, Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, 2–9 October.
1991aPossession in Nahuatl: A historical explanation for irregularities. International Journal of American Linguistics 57: 298–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991bRaíces en ih- y ah-en el náhuatl y la **p protoyutoazteca. Estudios de Cultura Náhuatl 20: 261–280.Google Scholar
1994Nahuatl in Southern Uto-Aztecan: Some grammatical and phonological isoglosses. In Investigaciones lingüísticas en Mesoamerica, Carolyn Mackay & Verónica Vázquez (eds), 53–86. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas.Google Scholar
1996Long vowels and morpheme boundaries in Nahuatl and Uto-Aztecan: Comments on historical developments. Amerindia 21: 55–76.Google Scholar
2000Proto-Uto-Aztecan *p and the e-/ye- isogloss in Nahuatl dialectology. In Papers in Memory of Wick R. Miller by the Friends of Uto-Aztecan, Eugene H. Casad & Thomas L. Willett (eds), 213–220. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora, División de Humanidades y Bellas Artes, Editorial Unison.Google Scholar
2002Isoglosas e innovaciones yutoaztecas. In Avances y balances de lenguas Yutoaztecas, Homenaje a Wick R. Miller, in Noroeste de México (Número especial), José Luis Moctezuma Zamarrón & Jane H. Hill (eds), 313–344. Mexico City: Centro INAH-Sonora, CONACULTA-INAH.Google Scholar
2007Final features and proto-Uto-Aztecan: A contribution using morphological reconstruction. In Historical Linguistics 2005: Selected Papers from the XVII International Congress on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 284], Joseph Salmons & Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds), 295–309. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Del yutoazteca al *-hta- del náhuatl – y al itacate y el taco del español popular: Una contribución en homenaje a tres intereses lingüísticos de Yolanda Lastra. In Entre las lenguas indígenas, la sociolingüística y el español: Estudios en homenaje a Yolanda Lastra, Martha Ruth Islas (ed.), 342–365. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2013Infants in cradles and other odd-shaped objects: Tracing the formation of semantic categories through phonological changes in some Uto-Aztecan languages. Paper presented at the Friends of Uto-Aztecan Conference, Boise, ID, 14–15 June.
In preparation. A morphological conspiracy: New considerations on the origins of Aztec -tl- through the development of consonant clusters.
Dakin, Karen & Wichmann, Søren
2000Cacao and chocolate: A Uto-Aztecan perspective. Ancient Mesoamerica 11: 1–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Estrada Fernández, Zarina
1996Pima Bajo. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
García, Ricardo
2014Where bilingualism mattered: Nahuatl on the western and northern frontiers of New Spain. Voices 2: 13–23. http://​escholarship​.org​/uc​/item​/1058h69n
Gerhard, Peter
1982The North Frontier of New Spain. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T.
1973Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist’s field trip. Papers of the Chicago Linguistics Society 7: 394–415.Google Scholar
2009The Genesis of Syntactic Complexity: Diachrony, Ontogeny, Neuro-cognition, Evolution. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gran Diccionario Náhuatl
[online] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 2012 [ref del 14 November 2015] http://​www​.gdn​.unam​.mx
Grimes, E. José, with de la Cruz Avila, Pedro, Carrillo Vicente, José, Díaz, Filiberto, Díaz, Román, de la Rosa, Antonio & Rentería, Toribio
1981El Huichol, Apuntes sobre el léxico. Ithaca NY: Department of Modern Languages and Linguistics, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Guerra, Juan
1692Arte de la lengua mexicana según la acostumbran hablar los Indios en todo el obispado de Guadiana y del de Mechoacán. Reprinted by Alberto Santoscoy, Guadalajara: Ancira y Hns. 1900, Mexico City.Google Scholar
Harvey, H. R.
1972The Relaciones Geográficas 1579–1586: Native languages. In Handbook of Middle American Indians, Guide to Ethnohistorical Sources, Vol. 12, Part I, Robert Wauchope (gen. ed.), Howard F. Cline (vol. ed.). Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Hasler, Juan A.
1975Los dialectos de la lengua nahua. América Indígena 35: 179–188.Google Scholar
1976La situación dialectológica del pochuteco. International Journal of American Linguistics 42: 268–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Estudios nahuas. Jalapa: Universidad Veracruzana.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey
1977Uto-Aztecan morphophonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 43: 27–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1978Uto-Aztecan *na-class verbs. International Journal of American Linguistics 44: 211–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hers, Marie-Areti
1989Los toltecas en tierras chichimecas. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas.Google Scholar
Hilton, K. Simón
1959Diccionario tarahumara de Samachique, Chihuahua. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano & Tucson, AZ: Summer Institute of Linguistics. Revised edition 1993.Google Scholar
Hill, Kenneth C.
2010Wick Miller’s Uto-Aztecan cognate sets. Electronic file.Google Scholar
Iannucci, David Edmund
1973Numic Historical Phonology. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Iturrioz, José Luis & Gómez López, Paula
2006Gramática Wixarika I. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Terrence
1981 Comparative Uto-Aztecan phonology. Ms.Google Scholar
Lamb, Sydney
1958Linguistic prehistory in the Great Basin. International Journal of American Linguistics 25: 95–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1970The vowels of Proto-Uto-Aztecan. International Journal of American Linguistics 36: 169–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1977An Overview of Uto-Aztecan Grammar. Studies in Uto-Aztecan Grammar, Vol. 1. Arlington TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Lastra de Suárez, Yolanda
1986Las áreas dialectales del náhuatl moderno. Mexico City: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Walter
1920Zentral-Amerika. Erster Teil: Die Sprachen Zentral-Amerikas in ihren Beziehungen zueinander sowie zu Süd-Amerika und Mexiko, Teil I, Band II. Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar
Manaster-Ramer, Alexis
1993On lenition in some Northern Uto-Aztecan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 59: 334–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mason, J. Alden
1916Tepecano, A Piman language of western Mexico. Annals of the New York Academy of Science 25: 309–416. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, Ambrosio & Aiton de McMahon, María
1959Cora y español. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano en cooperación con la Dirección General de Asuntos Indígenas de la Secretaría de Educación Pública.Google Scholar
von Mentz, Brígida
2015Movimientos de población y topónimos en Europa central y en Mesoamérica: Un ejemplo de la complementariedad de la lingüística y la historia. Paper presented in the colloquium, Semana de la Historia, Comité Mexicano de Ciencias Históricas, 21–25 September 2015, Casa Chata, CIESAS.
Merrill, William L.
2013The genetic unity of Southern Uto-Aztecan. Language Dynamics and Change 3: 68–104.Google Scholar
Miller, Wick R.
1967Uto-Aztecan Cognate Sets. Berkeley CA: The University of California.Google Scholar
de Molina, fray Alonso
1571Vocabulario en lengua castellana y mexicana. Reprinted Leipzig, 1880; Puebla, 1910; facsimile edn, Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica, 1944; facsimile edn, Mexico City: Porrúa, S.A 1970 4™ edn 1970.Google Scholar
de Ortega, José
1732Vocabulario en lengua castellana y cora. Mexico City. Reprinted in the Boletín de la Sociedad Mexicana de Geografía y Estadística, 1ª época, 8: 561–605 1860; also reprinted in Tepic 1888.Google Scholar
Parra Gutiérrez, Rodrigo
2011¿Existe un sistema de clases nominales en cora mariteco? Un análisis de la posible motivación semántica de las clases. In Memorias de las Jornadas de Lenguas en contacto. Tepic: Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit. www​.cucsh​.uan​.edu​.mx​/linguistica​/jornadas
Pharao Hansen, Magnus
2014The east-west split in Nahuan dialectology: Reviewing the evidence and consolidating the grouping. 1. Paper presented at the Friends of Uto-Aztecan Workshop, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit, Tepic, Nayarit, 20 June.
Preuss, Karl Theodor
1932Grammatik der Cora-Sprache. International Journal of American Linguistics 7: 1–84. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1934Wörterbuch deutsch – Cora. International Journal of American Linguistics 8: 81–102.Google Scholar
Ramírez Flores, José
1980Lenguas indígenas de Jalisco. Guadalajara: Unidad Editorial del Gobierno de Jalisco.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1915Southern Paiute and Nahuatl, A Study in Uto-Aztecan, Part II. American Anthropologist 17: 98–120, 306–328. Also published 1914–1919, Journal de la Société des Americanistes de Paris, n. s. 11: 443–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steele, Susan M.
1976A law of order: Word order change in Classical Aztec. International Journal of American Linguistics 42: 31–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Brian D.
2011Uto-Aztecan: A Comparative Vocabulary. Flower Mound TX: Shumway Family History Services & Blanding UT: Rocky Mountain Books and Publications.Google Scholar
Valiñas Coalla, Leopoldo José Manuel
1979El náhuatl en Jalisco, Colima y Michoacán. Anales de Antropología 14: 325–344.Google Scholar
1981El náhuatl de la periferia occidental y la costa del Pacifico. Licenciatura thesis, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, INAH-SEP.Google Scholar
2009Historia lingüística: Migraciones y asentamientos. Relaciones entre pueblos y lenguas, Versión corta con mapas, archivo digital. Mexico City.Google Scholar
2010Historia lingüística: Migraciones y asentamientos. Relaciones entre pueblos y lenguas. In Historia Sociolingüística de México, Vol. 1, Rebeca BarrigaVillanueva & Pedro Martín Butragueño (eds), 97–160. Mexico City: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Voegelin, Carl F. Voegelin, Florence M. & Hale, Kenneth L.
1962Typological and Comparative Grammar of Uto-Aztecan, I: Phonology [Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, Memoir 17]. International Journal of American Linguistics.Google Scholar
Weigand, Phil C.
1985Considerations on the archaeology and ethnohistory of the Mexicaneros, Tequales, Coras, Huicholes, and Caxcanes of Nayarit, Jalisco, and Zacatecas. In Contributions to the Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Greater Mesoamerica, William J. Folan (ed.), 126–187. Carbondale TX: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
1992Consideraciones sobre la arqueología y la etnohistoria de los mexicaneros, los tecuales, los coras, los huicholes y los caxcanes de Nayarit, Jalisco y Zacatecas. In Ensayos sobre el Gran Nayar entre coras, huicholes y tepehuanos, 175–214. Mexico City: CEMCA-INI-El Colegio de Michoacán, A.C.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin L.
1937The origin of Aztec tl. American Anthropologist 39: 265–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willett, Thomas Leslie
1991A Reference Grammar of Southeastern Tepehuan. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics & University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Alexis
Online. Dictionnaire de la langue nahuatl classique. http://​sites​.estvideo​.net​/malinal​/nahuatl​.page​.html
Yáñez Rosales, Rosa H.
1994Dinámica del desplazamiento de las lenguas indígenas en el occidente de México: Época Colonial. In El Occidente de México en el Tiempo, P. R. Ávila (ed.), 59–75. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara.Google Scholar
2013Ypan altepet monotza san Antonio de padua tlaxomulco ‘En el pueblo que se llama San Antonio de Padua, Tlajomulco’, Textos en lengua náhuatl, siglos XVII y XVIII. Guadalajara: Instituto de Cultura, Recreación y Deportes, Gobierno Municipal de Tlajomulco de Zúñiga y Prometeo Editores.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

GRANT, ANTHONY
2020. Intimate Linguistic Contact and Spanish: Western Nahua (Nawa) Varieties of San Pedro Jícora and San Agustín Buenaventura, Durango, Mexico. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 97:1  pp. 11 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.