Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives
Edited by Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó
[Studies in Language Companion Series 186] 2017
► pp. 1–33

Introduction
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles

What do we know and where do we go from here?

| University of Genoa
| University of Insubria
Article outline
  • 1.Preliminary remarks
  • 2.PMs, DMs, their definitions and delimitations: What do we know?
  • 3.PMs, DMs, their definitions and delimitations: Where do we go from here?
  • 4.The status of modal particles: What do we know and where do we go from here?
  • 5.The diachrony of PMs/DMs: What do we know?
  • 6.The diachrony of PMs/DMs: Where do we go from here?
  • 7.PMs/DMs and sociolinguistic variation: What do we know?
  • 8.PMs/DMs and sociolinguistic variation: Where do we go from here?
  • 9.This volume
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.186.01fed
References

References

Abraham, Werner
2009 Die Urmasse von Modalität und ihre Ausgliederung. Modalität anhand von Modalverben, Modalpartikeln und Modus. Was ist das Gemeinsame, was das Trennende, und was steckt dahinter? In Modalität: Epistemik und Evidentialität bei Modalverb, Adverb, Modalpartikel und Modus, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 251–302. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2012 Illocutive force is speaker and information source concern. What type of syntax does the representation of speaker deixis require? Templates vs. derivational structure? In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 67–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Certainty. Its conceptual differential. In Certainty-uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Between [Studies in Language Companion Series 165], Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner & Elisabeth Leiss
2012 Introduction: Theory of mind elements across languages. Traces of Bühler’s legacy in modern linguistics. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aijmer, Karin
1997 I think – an English modal particle. In Modality in Germanic languages: Historical and comparative perspectives, Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westwik (eds), 1–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2015 “Will you fuck off please”. The use of please by London teenagers / “Jódete por favor”. El uso de please por parte de los adolescents londinenses. Pragmatica Sociocultural/Sociocultural Pragmatics 3(2): 127–149.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Andersen, Gisle
2012 Introducing the pragmatics of society. In Pragmatics of Society, Karin Aijmer & Gisle Andersen (eds), 1–27. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie
2006 Introduction. In Pragmatic Markers in Contrast, Karin Aijmer & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds), 1–10. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Asher, Nicolas & Lascarides, Alex
2009 Commitments, beliefs and intentions in dialogue. Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialog (Longdial), London, 35–42.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne
2008 The structure of requests in Irish English and English English. In Schneider & Barron (eds), 35–67.Google Scholar
Barron, Anne & Schneider, Klaus P.
(eds) 2005 The Pragmatics of Irish English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2006 Discourse markers in Italian: Towards a compositional meaning. In Fischer (ed.), 449–464.Google Scholar
2011 Segnali discorsivi. In Enciclopedia dell’italiano. Roma: Istituto della Enciclopedia italiana Giovanni Treccani.Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate
2016 Pragmatic Markers in British English: Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich
(eds) 2014 Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berruto, Gaetano
1995 Fondamenti di sociolinguistica. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
1987 Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, Shoshana & House, Juliane
1989 Cross-cultural and situational variation in requesting behavior. In Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Requests and Apologies, Shoshana Blum-Kulka, Juliane House & Gabriele Kasper (eds), 123–154. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J.
1990 The development of discourse markers in English. In Historical Linguistics and Philology, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 45–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Historical discourse analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds), 138–160. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William
1994 The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2012 Modal particles, speaker-hearer links, and illocutionary force. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 253–296. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuenca, Maria Josep
2013 The fuzzy boundaries between discourse marking and modal marking. In Degand et al. (eds), 191–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
(ed) 2011  Historical Sociopragmatics . Special issue of Journal of Historical Pragmatics 10(2). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Archer, Dawn
2008 Requests and directenss in Early Modern English trial proceedings and play-texts, 1640–1760. In Speech Acts in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 176], Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 45–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola
(eds) 2013 Discourse Markers and Modal Particles. Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard
2016 Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance, Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds), 635–658. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane
2009 Discourse markers and regional variation in French: A lexico-semantic approach. In Sociolinguistic Variation in Contemporary French [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 26], Kate Beeching, Nigel Armstrong & Françoise Gadet (eds), 201–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2014 Stylistic innovation and indexical obsolescence. Talk given at NWAV 43 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Wenger, Étienne
2005 Communities of practice in sociolinguistics: What is the role of power in sociolinguistic variation? Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(4): 582–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferri, Rolando
2008 Politeness in Latin comedy: Some preliminary thoughts. Materiali e Discussioni per l’Analisi dei Testi Classici 61: 15–28.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin
2006a Approaches to Discourse Particles [Studies in Pragmatics 1]. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2006b Towards an understanding of the spectrum of approaches to discourse particles. In Fischer (ed.), 1–20.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Alm, Maria
2013 A radical construction grammar perspective on the modal particle-discourse particle distinction. In Degand et al. (eds), 47–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1999 What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Towards a theory of discourse markers. In Fischer (ed.), 189–204.Google Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014 The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In Ghezzi & Molinelli (eds), 10–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Molinelli, Piera
2014a Deverbal pragmatic markers from Latin to Italian (Lat. quaeso and It. prego): The cyclic nature of functional developments. In Ghezzi & Molinelli (eds), 60–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds) 2014b Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1981 Forms of Talk. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt M.
2006 A dynamic polysemy approach to the lexical semantics of discourse markers (with an exemplary analysis of French toujours) . In Fischer (ed.), 21–41.Google Scholar
2009 The grammaticalization of negative reinforcers in Old and Middle French: A discourse-functional approach. In Current Trends in Diachronic Semantics and Pragmatics, Maj-Britt Mosegaard Hansen & Jacqueline Visconti (eds), 227–251. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt M. & Rossari, Corinne
2005 The evolution of pragmatic markers. Introduction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 6(2): 177–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt M. & Visconti, Jacqueline
2009 On the diachrony of reinforced negation in French and Italian. In Grammaticalization and Pragmatics. Facts, Approaches, Theoretical Issues, Corinne Rossari, Claudia Ricci & Adriana Spiridon (eds), 137–171. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 The evolution of negation in French and Italian: Similarities and differences. Folia Linguistica 46: 453–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
2002 On the role of context in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman
1992 Über Verum Fokus in Deutschen. Linguistische Berichte 60: 20–45.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1997 Women, language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(2): 195–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
House, Juliane
2012 Global and intercultural communication. In Pragmatics of Society, Karin Aijmer & Gisle Andersen (eds), 607–626. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita
2013 From discourse markers to modal/final particles. What the position reveals about the continuum. In Degand et al. (eds), 217–236.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H.
1997 The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics 1(1): 91–110. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Discourse markers in Early Modern English. In Alternative Histories of English, Peter Trudgill & Richard J. Watts (eds), 210–230. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 Historical speech act analysis: Greetings and farewells. In Proceedings of Anglistentag 2010 Saarbrücken, Joachim Frenk & Lena Steveker (eds), 397–406. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Taavitsainen, Irma
2012 Diachronic speech act analysis: Insults from flyting to flaming. In Corpus Linguistics, Vol. II: Grammar, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 237–260. Los Angeles CA: Sage. Reprinted from Journal of Historical Pragmatics 1(1): 67–95.Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2011 On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4): 848–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lech, Peter G. Barrios
2016 Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1999 The distribution and function of vocatives in American and British English conversation. In Out of Corpora. Studies in Honour of Stig Johansson, Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds), 107–118. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Leiss, Elisabeth
2012 Epistemicity, evidentiality, and Theory of Mind (ToM). In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 39–65. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Modes of modality in an un-Cartesian framework. In Certainty-uncertainty – and the Attitudinal Space in Between [Studies in Language Companion Series 165], Sibilla Cantarini, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 47–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Lewis, Diane
2006 Discourse markers in English: A discourse-pragmatic view. In Fischer (ed.), 43–59.Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula
2012 Discourse Markers in Early Modern English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 227]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maché, Jakob
2012 Exploring the Theory of Mind interface. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 109–146. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael
1994 Metalanguaging and discourse markers in bilingual conversation. Language in Society 23: 325–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Schiffrin, Deborah
2015 Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, 2nd edn, Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 189–221. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron
1998 Utterance modifiers and universals of grammatical borrowing. Linguistics 36: 281–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Fusion and the cognitive basis for bilingual discourse markers. International Journal of Bilingualism 4: 505–528. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazzon, Gabriella
2012  Now what? The analysis of Middle English discourse markers and advances in historical dialogue studies. In The Use and Development of Middle English, Richard Dance & Laura Wright (eds), 61–86. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Meinl, Marja E.
2014 Electronic Complaints: An Empirical Study on British English and German Complaints. Berlin: Frank & Timme.Google Scholar
Meisnitzer, Benjamin
2012 Modality in the Romance languages. In Modality and Theory of Mind Elements across Languages, Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 335–359. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma
2008 Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice among Latina Youth Gangs. Maiden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, Leslie
2002 Social networks. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 549–572. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Norén, Kerstin & Linell, Per
2007 Meaning potentials and the interaction between lexis and contexts: An empirical substantiation. Pragmatics 17(3): 387–416. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Placencia, María Elena
2008 Requests in corner shop transactions in Ecuadorian Andean and Coastal Spanish. In Schneider & Barron (eds), 307–332.Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador
2006 A functional approach to discourse markers. In Fischer (ed.), 77–99.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus P. & Barron, Anne
(eds) 2008 Variational Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 178]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
2006 Discourse marker research and theory: Revisiting and . In Fischer (ed.), 315–338.Google Scholar
Schölmberger, Ursula
2008 Apologizing in French French and Canadian French. In Schneider & Barron (eds), 333–354.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A.
2003  No and Tampoco: A pragmatic distinction in Spanish negation. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 999–1030. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The pragmatics of negation in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 115: 1427–1456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Fine-tuning Jespersen’s cycle. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn [Studies in Language Companion Series 80], Betty J. Birner & Gregory Ward (eds), 327–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson
1986 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995 Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 37–54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trosborg, Anna
1995 Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Visconti, Jacqueline
2009 From ‘textual’ to ‘interpersonal’: On the diachrony of the Italian particle mica . Journal of Pragmatics 41: 937–950. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltereit, Richard
2001 Modal particles and their functional equivalents: a speech-act-theoretic approach. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 1391–1417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 The rise of discourse markers in Italian: A specific type of language change. In Fischer (ed.), 61–76.Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard & Detges, Ulrich
2007 Different functions, different histories. Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61–80.Google Scholar
Warga, Muriel
2008 Requesting in German as a pluricentric language. In Schneider & Barron (eds), 245–266.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 11 other publications

BORISOVA, Elena G. & Anna M. IVANOVA
2023. A CASE FOR EMPHATIC PARTICLES IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication :Issue №1_2023 ► pp. 25 ff. DOI logo
Collins, Peter Craig
2022. Comment markers in world Englishes. World Englishes 41:2 ► pp. 244 ff. DOI logo
Islentyeva, Anna, Luise Pesendorfer & Igor Tolochin
2023. “Can I have a cup of tea please?” Politeness markers in the Spoken BNC2014. Journal of Politeness Research 19:2 ► pp. 297 ff. DOI logo
Ivanová, Martina
2018. Pragmatický Marker Fair Enough A Jeho Prekladové Ekvivalenty V Anglicko­Slovenskom Paralelnom Korpuse. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 69:3 ► pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten
2021. Proposition d’une classification des marqueurs discursifs comme membres d’un paradigme. Langue française N° 209:1 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Kocsány, Piroska
2021. Az ott szokatlan szerepei. Jelentés és Nyelvhasználat 8:1 ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Magliacane, Annarita
2020. Erasmus students in an Irish studyabroad context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 5:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Marmorstein, Michal
2021. Discourse markers as a lens to variation across speech and writing. Functions of Language 28:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Robledo, Hernán & Rogelio Nazar
2023. A proposal for the inductive categorisation of parenthetical discourse markers in Spanish using parallel corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:4 ► pp. 500 ff. DOI logo
Van Olmen, Daniël & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2021. Introduction. Pragmatic markers and peripheries. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Waltereit, Richard
2020. Chapter 7. Is the information-structural contribution of modal particles in the syntax, in discourse structure, or in both?. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.