Chapter published in:
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 140
References

References

Alexander, Ronelle
2006Bosnian, Croatian, Serbian, a Grammar: With Sociolinguistic Commentary. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery
1985The major functions of the noun phrase. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Timothy Shopen (ed), 62–154. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Baker, Mona
1993Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 233–252. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beavers, John, Levin, Beth & Wei Tham, Shiao
2010The typology of motion expressions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 46: 331–377.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berthele, Raphael
2006Ort und Weg. Die sprachliche Raumreferenz in Varietäten des Deutschen, Rätoromanischen und Französischen. Berlin: De Gruyter.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Disentangling manner and path: Evidence from varieties of German and Romance. In Variation and Change in the Encoding of Motion Events [Human Cognitive Processing 41], Juliana Goschler & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
1977Case Marking in Australian Languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, Remco, Lemey, Philippe, Dunn, Michael, Greenhill, Simon J., Alekseyenko, Alexander V., Drummond, Alexei J., Gray, Russell D., Suchard, Marc A. & Atkinson, Quentin D.
2012Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science 337: 957–960.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, David & Moulton, Vincent
2004Neighbor-Net: An agglomerative method for the construction of phylogenetic networks. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21(2): 255–265.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calude, Andreea S. & Verkerk, Annemarie
2016The typology and diachrony of higher numerals in Indo-European: A phylogenetic comparative study. Journal of Language Evolution 1(2): 91–108.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cappelle, Bert
2012English is less rich in manner-of-motion verbs when translated from French. Across Languages and Cultures 13: 173–195.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William, Barðdal, Johanna, Hollman, Willem, Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki
2010Revising Talmy’s typological classification of complex event constructions. In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 10], Hans C. Boas (ed), 201–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, Michael, Greenhill, Simon J., Levinson, Stephen C. & Gray, Russell D.
2011Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473: 79–82.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fibigerová, Kateřina, Guidetti, Michéle & Šulová, Lenka
2012Verbal and gestural expression of motion in French and Czech. In Space and Time in Languages and Cultures: Language, Culture, and Cognition [Human Cognitive Processing 37], Luna Filipović & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds), 251–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filipović, Luna
2007Talking about Motion: A Crosslinguistic Investigation of Lexicalization Patterns [Studies in Language Companion Series 91]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J.
1971[1975]Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Freckleton, Rob P., Harvey, Paul H. & Pagel, Mark
2002Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence. The American Naturalist 160: 712–726.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
2003The corpus approach: A common way forward for contrastive linguistics and translation studies? In Corpus-based Approaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies, Sylviane Granger, Jacques Lerot & Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds), 17–30. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Guillot, Gilles & Rousset, François
2012Dismantling the Mantel tests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4: 336–344.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harmon, Luke J., Weir, Jason T., Brock, Chad D., Glor, Richard E. & Challenger, Wendell
2008GEIGER: Investigating evolutionary radiations. Bioinformatics 24: 129–131.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, Maya, Hendriks, Henriëtte, Soroli, Efstathia, Iakovleva, Tatiana & Ji, Yinglin
To appear. Space and language typology: Encoding motion across languages.
Huson, Daniel H. & Bryant, David
2006Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2): 254–267.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1935/1937La catégorie des cas. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide
2009Path salience in motion events. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, Jiansheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Şeyda Özçalışkan (eds), 403–414. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko
1987‘Source’ vs. ‘goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Concepts of Case, René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds), 122–146. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kabata, Kaori
2013Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 36: 78–89.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura
2005Source and goal asymmetry in non-linguistic motion event representations. PhD dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University.
Lakusta, Laura & Landau, Barbara
2005Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 96: 1–33.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Pierre & Fortin, Marie-Josée
2010Comparison of the Mantel test and alternative approaches for detecting complex multivariate relationships in the spatial analysis of genetic data. Molecular Ecology Resources 10: 831–844.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Traci Speed
2011Bulgarian Verbs of Motion: Slavic Verbs in a Balkan Context. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the source/goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47: 1113–1141.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orme, David
2011The caper package: Comparative analysis of phylogenetics and evolution in R. 〈https://​cran​.r​-project​.org​/web​/packages​/caper​/vignettes​/caper​.pdf
Pagel, Mark
1997Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zoologica Scriptica 26: 331–348.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401: 877–84.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48: 1043–1081.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna
2010Source–goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science 34: 1064–1092.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta & Volynsky, Maria
2015Motion encoding in Russian and English: Moving beyond Talmy’s typology. Modern Language Journal, 99: 32–48.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R. Core Team
2015R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Regier, Terry
1997Constraints on the learning of spatial terms: A computational investigation. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation [Mechanisms of Perceptual Learning 36], Robert L. Goldstone, Douglas L. Medin & Philippe G. Schyns (eds), 171–217. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu
2007Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Revell, Liam J., Harmon, Luke J. & Collar, David C.
2008Phylogenetic signal, evolutionary process, and rate. Systematic Biology 57: 591–601.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I.
1996Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning, Masayoshi Shibitani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 195–219. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2004The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2005Relating narrative events in translation. In Perspectives on Language and Language Development: Essays in Honor of Ruth A. Berman, Dorit Diskin Ravid & Hava Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds), 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Rohde, Ada
2004The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Soroli, Efstathia & Verkerk, Annemarie
To appear. Differences in the coding of spatial language impact classification: Current methodological and typological issues with a special focus on Modern Greek. Languages in Contrast.
Svorou, Soteria
1994The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
2002Translationese – a myth or an empirical fact? A study into the linguistic identifiability of translated language. Target 14: 207–220.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Schmid, Hans-Jörg
1996An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie
2014The Evolutionary Dynamics of Motion Event Encoding. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Verspoor, Marjolijn & Dirven, René
2004Putting concepts together: Syntax. In Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1], 2nd edn, René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds), 75–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2008Coding spatial relations in Homeric Greek: Preverbs vs. prepositions. Historische Sprachforschung 121(1): 114–161.Google Scholar
von Waldenfels, Ruprecht & Meyer, Roland
2006–present. ParaSol, a Corpus of Slavic and Other Languages. 〈parasol​.unibe​.ch
Wälchli, Bernhard
2007Advantages and disadvantages of using parallel texts in typological investigations. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 60(2): 118–134.Google Scholar
2009Motion Events in Parallel Texts: A Study in Primary-data Typology. Habilitationsschrift, Universität Bern.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Zúñiga, Fernando
2006Source–Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. STUF – Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59: 284–303.Google Scholar
Xiao, Richard
2010How different is translated Chinese from native Chinese? A corpus-based study of translation universals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 15: 5–35.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Kevin & Bowern, Claire
2015Quantifying uncertainty in the phylogenetics of Australian numeral systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 282: 20151278.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Fagard, Benjamin & Anetta Kopecka
2021. Source/Goal (a)symmetry. Studies in Language 45:1  pp. 130 ff. Crossref logo
Kopecka, Anetta & Marine Vuillermet
2021. Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages. Studies in Language 45:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.