Chapter published in:
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 207240
References

Sources [Le Petit Prince]

Aragonese - Aragüés, Chusé
1994O prenzipet. Zaragoza: Gara.Google Scholar
Aranese - Barès, Verònica
2005Eth petit prince. Barcelona: Entuarea Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Aromanian - Bara, Maria
2007Njiclu amirārush. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Asturian - García Arias, Xosé Lluis, & Suárez Mella, Marta
1994El Principín. Uviéu: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Badiota - Mischì, Giovanni
1993Le Pice Prinz. San Martin de Tor: Istitut Cultural Ladin "Micurá de Rü".Google Scholar
Bergamasco - Recanati, Margherita
2000L’ Prìncep Picinì. Treviglio: Leo Facco Editore.Google Scholar
Bolognese - Serra, Roberto
2003Al pränzip fangén. Gressan: Wesak.Google Scholar
Catalan - Xancó, Juan
1967El Petit Príncep. Barcelona: Editorial Estela.Google Scholar
Corsican - Casta, Santu
1990U principellu. Ajaccio: Akenaton; Squadra di u Finusellu.Google Scholar
Eonaviego - Frías-Conde, Xavier
2008El Principín. Spain: self edited.Google Scholar
Extremaduran - Garríu Correas, Antòniu
1999El prencipinu. Badajoz: Carisma Libros.Google Scholar
French - Saint-Exupéry, Antoine de
1948Le Petit Prince. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Friulan - Seravalli, Bruno
1992Il pičul princip. Gemona: Casa per l’Europa.Google Scholar
Galician - Casares, Carlos
2006O principiño. Vigo: Galaxia. Árbore.Google Scholar
Gallurese - Corda, Alessandra
2013Lu Principeddhu. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Gascon - Morá, Pèir
1995Lo prinçòt. Gradignan: Princi negre. PRI.Google Scholar
Genovese - Garibbo, Alessandro
2011O prinçipìn. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Gherdeina - Prinoth, Beatrix
1993L Pitl Prinz. San Martin de Tor: Istitut Cultural Ladin "Micurá de Rü".Google Scholar
Italian Bompiani - Bregoli, Nini
2000Il piccolo principe. Milano: Tascabili Bompiani. Tascabili Bompiani.Google Scholar
Languedocien - Blanc, Jòrdi
1994Lo princilhon. Andouque: Vent terral. Mirondèla.Google Scholar
Limousin - Rainal, Pau
2011Lo Prinçonet. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Milanese - Banfi, Lorenzo
2002El Princip Piscinin. Gressan: Wesak Editions.Google Scholar
Moldavian - Creţu, Igor
1974Микул Принц. Chişinău: Editura Lumina.Google Scholar
Neapolitan - D’Ajello, Roberto
2000O’ princepe piccerillo. Sorrento: F. Di Mauro.Google Scholar
Niçard - Rosso, Albert
2002Lou pichin prince. Pau: Princi negre. Entaus mainadges.Google Scholar
Occitan (Piemonte) - Jayme, Giovanna
2001Ël Pchi Prinsë. Gressan: Éditions Wesak.Google Scholar
Parmigian - Porcari, Paolo
2011Al principén. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Picardian (Borain) - Capron, André
2010Ël pëtit prēce. Éd. limitée. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Picardian - Delmotte, Bruno
2010El’ pétit prince. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Piemontese - Perrini, Gianluca
2000Ël Cit Prinsi. Turin: Gioventura Piemontèisa.Google Scholar
Portuguese - Morais Varela, Joana
1987O Principezinho. Lisboa: Editora Caravela.Google Scholar
Provençal I - Ariès, Andriéu
1995Lou pichot prince. Aix-en-Provence: Édisud.Google Scholar
Provençal II - Vautherin, Raymond
2003Lo petsou prince. Gressan Vallée d’Aoste: Wesak.Google Scholar
Romanian - Creţu, Igor
 1993Micul Prinţ. Chişinău: Editura Făt-Frumos.Google Scholar
Rumantsch - Monn, Ursulina
2005Il pitschen prinzi. Cuira: Lia rumantscha.Google Scholar
Sardinian - Deplano, Andria
1997Su Prinzipeddu. Cagliari: Artigianarte.Google Scholar
Sephardic PeretsAvner, Pimienta, Gladys
2010El princhipiko. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Sicilian - Gallo, Mario
2010U principinu. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Spanish - Frances, José Maria
1964El Pequeño Principe. México City: Editorial Diana, S. A.Google Scholar
Surmeiran - Cadotsch, Peder
1977Igl Pitschen Prenci. Cuir: Ediziun Leia Rumantscha.Google Scholar
Valdotain - Vautherin, Raymond
2000Lo Petsou Prince. Gressan, Vallée d’Aoste: Éditions Wesak.Google Scholar
Valenciano - Arabí, Jaume
2007El príncep xiquet. Barcelona: Entuarea Publicaciones.Google Scholar
Venetian - Penello, Nicoletta
2003El Principe Picinin. Gressan: Éditions Wesak.Google Scholar
Wallonian - Fauconnier, Jean-Luc
2008Li p’tit prince. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar
Wallonian (Central) - Louis, Bernard
2013Li p’tit prince. Neckarsteinach: Tintenfass.Google Scholar

References

Academia de la Llingua Asturiana
2001Gramática de la llingua Asturiana. Uviéu: Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G.
2005The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge: CUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bendel, Christiane
2006Baskische Grammatik. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Bennett, David C.
1989Ablative-locative transfers: Evidence from Slovene and Serbo-Croat. Oxford Slavonic Papers 22: 133–154.Google Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
1986La lingua sarda contemporanea. Grammatica del logudorese e del campidanese. Cagliari: Della Torre.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boretzky, Norbert
1977Einführung in die historische Linguistik. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl
1911Vergleichende Laut-, Stammbildungs- und Flexionslehre nebst Lehre vom Gebrauch der Wortformen der indogermanischen Sprachen, Zweiter Band: Lehre von den Wortformen und ihrem Gebrauch, zweiter Teil. Straßburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Brumme, Jenny
1997Praktische Grammatik der katalanischen Sprache. Wilhelmsfeld: Egert.Google Scholar
Carballo Calero, Ricardo
1979Gramática elemental del gallego común. Vigo: Galaxia.Google Scholar
Chisholm, William, Milic, Louis T. & Greppin, John A. C.
(eds) 1984Interrogativity: A Colloquium on the Grammar, Typology and Pragmatics of Questions in Seven Diverse Languages [Typological Studies in Language 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Smith, Norval
1977The lingua descriptive series questionnaire. Lingua 42(1): 1–72.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2005The canonical approach to typology. In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 72], Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges & David S. Rood (eds), 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Deponency, syncretism, and what lies between. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 21–44. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2006Encoding the distinction between location, source and direction: a typological study. In Space in Languages [Typological Studies in Language 66], Maya Hickman & Stephane Robert (eds), 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cristofaro, Sonia
2011Language universals and linguistic knowledge. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed.), 227–249. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cysouw, Michael
2007Content interrogatives in Asénica Campa: corpus study and typological comparison. International Journal of American Linguistics 73(2): 133–163.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2010Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012Basic Linguistic Theory, Vol. 3: Further Grammatical Topics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Doniyorova, Soadat, Arzikulova, Djamila & Donyorov, Chodiyor
2008Parlons khakas. Une langue de Sibérie. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Doniyorova, Soadat & Qahramonil, Toshtemirov
2004Parlons koumyk (Daghestan). Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne M., Thomason, Olga A. & de Swart, Peter
2013Mapping out the Source domain. Studies in Language 37(2): 302–355.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ersen-Rasch, Margarete I.
2009Baschkirisch. Lehrbuch für Anfänger und Fortgeschrittene. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2012Türkische Grammatik. Ausführlich und verständlich. Lernstufen A1 bis C2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz
1986Kurze Grammatik der georgischen Sprache. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar
1994Grammatik der altgeorgischen Sprache. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Fierro, Aurelio
1989Grammatica della lingua napoletana. Milano: Rusconi.Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin & Stefanowitsch, Anatol
2006Konstruktionsgrammatik: ein Überblick. In Konstruktionsgrammatik. Von der Anwendung zur Theorie, Kerstin Fischer & Anatol Stefanowitsch (eds), 3–18. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Friederich, Michael
2002Uyghurisch Lehrbuch. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
von Gabain, Annemarie
1950Alttürkische Grammatik. Leipzig: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Goldap, Christel
1991Lokale Relationen im Yukatekischen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Iordan, Iorgu & Robu, Vladimir
1978Limba română contemporană. Bucureşti: Editura didactică şi pedagogică.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1917Negation in English and Other Languages. København: Høst.Google Scholar
Kabatek, Johannes
2003Gibt es einen Grammatikalisierungszyklus des Artikels in der Romania? Romanistisches Jahrbuch 53: 56–80.Google Scholar
Karanfil, Güllü
2010Parlons gagaouze. Paris: L‘Harmattan.Google Scholar
Kartozia, Guram, Germasia, Rusudan, Lomia, Maia & Tskhadaia, Taia
2010Megrulis lingvisṭuli analizi. Tbilisi: Meridiali.Google Scholar
Khojayori, Nasrullo & Thompson, Mikael
2009Tajiki. Reference Grammar for Beginners. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Johannes
2004Das Griechische und das Lateinisch-Romanische auf dem Wege vom synthetischen zum analytischen Sprachtyp? In Die europäischen Sprachen auf dem Weg zum analytischen Sprachtyp, Uwe Hinrichs (ed.), 127–146. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kutscher, Silvia
2010When ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: The case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen-variety of Laz (South Caucasian). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 63(2): 252–271.Google Scholar
Landmann, Angelika
2010Usbekisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2011Kirgisisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2012Kasachisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2013aAserbaidschanisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2013bTurkmenisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2014aTatarisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
2014bTschuwaschisch. Kurzgrammatik. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1986An introduction to Cognitive Grammar. Cognitive Science 10: 1–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1995Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Lestrade, Sander
2010The Space of Case. Nijmegen: Radboud Universiteit.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1991Paradigm size, possible syncretism, and the use of adpositions with cases in flective languages. In Paradigms. The Economy of Inflection, Frans Plank (ed), 57–74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009A model for representing polysemy: The Italian preposition da . In Autour de la préposition. Actes du colloque international de Caen (20–22 septembre 2007), Jacques François, Eric Gilbert, Claude Guimier & Maxi Krause (eds), 167–178. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
2010Adverbial phrases. In A New Historical Syntax of Latin, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014Plotting diachronic semantic maps: The role of metaphor. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
1978Ablative-locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics 14: 129–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maj, Émilie & Leberre-Semenov, Marine
2010Parlons sakha. Langue et culture iakoutes. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor
1994Suppletion: Toward a logical analyses of the concept. Studies in Language 18(2): 339–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce & Robinson, Fred C.
2001A Guide to Old English. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mossé, Fernand
1969Handbuch des Mittelenglischen. München: Hueber.Google Scholar
Nickel, Klaus Peter
1990Samisk grammatikk. Tromsø: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009Subcategorization patterns and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47(5): 1113–1141. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Spano, Marianna
2014‘Behind’ and ‘in front’ in Ancient Greek: a case study in orientation asymmetry. In On Ancient Grammars of Space: Linguistic Research on the Expression of Spatial Relations and Motion in Ancient Languages, Silvia Kutscher & Daniel Werning (eds), 67–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010The syntactic structure of Locations, Goals, and Sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Kluender, Robert
2007Linguistic typology and theory construction: Common challenges ahead. Linguistic Typology 11(1): 273–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prokosch, Erich
2006Handbuch des Krimtatarischen unter Einschluss des Dobrudschatatarischen. Diachronische Grammatik mit kultur- und realkundlichem Hintergrund. Graz: Universität Graz.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidnely, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1978A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Robbeets, Martine & Bisang, Walter
2014When paradigms change. In Paradigm Change in the Transeurasian Languages and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series 161], Martine Robbeets & Walter Bisang (eds), 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romieu, Maurice & Bianchi, André
1995Gramatica de l’occitan gascon contemporanèu. Bordeaux: Presses universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Schwegler, Armin
1990Analyticity and Syntheticity. A Diachronic Perspective with Special Reference to Romance Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter
2001Interrogative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1010–1028. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Levkovych, Nataliya, Urdze, Aina, Nintemann, Julia & Robbers, Maja
Forthcoming. Where – Whither – Whence. Spatial Interrogatives in Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Stump, Gregory T.
2001Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sudlow, David
2009Dictionary of the Tamasheq of North-East Burkina Faso. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria
1993The Grammar of Space [Typological Studies in Language 25]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1983How language structures space. In Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, Herbert L. Pick & Linda P. Acredolo (eds), 225–282. New York NY: Plenum Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna
2011Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–381. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2012Overabundance in Italian verb morphology and its interactions with other non-canonical phenomena. In Irregularity in Morphology (and beyond), Thomas Stolz, Hitomi Otsuka, Aina Urdze & Johan van der Auwera (eds), 251–270. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Tosco, Fiorenzo
1997Grammatica del genovese. Recco: Le mani.Google Scholar
Touratier, Christian
2013Lateinische Grammatik. Linguistische Einführung in die lateinische Sprache. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Ultan, Russell
1978Some general characteristics of interrogative systems. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. 44: Syntax, Joseph Greenberg (ed.), 211–248. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Zuñiga, Fernando
2006Source–goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 59(3): 284–303.Google Scholar
Wąsik, Zdzisław
1982Zur strukturellen Typologie der Fragen (anhand ausgewählter indoeuropäischer Sprachen der Gegenwart). Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 35(1): 466–475.Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike
2004Interrogative constructions in signed languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives. Language 80(4): 7–39.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Nintemann, Julia & Maja Robbers
2019. Towards a typology of spatial deictic expressions . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:3  pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.