Cover not available
Part of
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017

Space in Diachrony

An introduction

| | University of Pavia
| | LLACAN – CNRS
| | University of Pavia & University of Bergamo
References
Aristar, Anthony Rodriguez
1996 The relationship between dative and locative: Kurylowicz’s argument from a typological perspective. Diachronica 13: 207–224.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, David C.
1989 Ablative-locative transfers: Evidence from Slovene and Serbo-Croat. Oxford Slavonic Papers 22: 133–154.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
1977 Case Marking in Australian Languages [Linguistic Series 23]. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine, Thomason, Olga A. & de Swart, Peter
2013 Mapping out the Source domain. Studies in Language 37(2): 302–355.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana
2003 Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 55–101.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1964 Inflectional Categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2009 A model for representing polysemy: The Italian preposition da . In Actes du Colloque “Autour de la préposition”, François, Jacques, Eric Gilbert, Claude Guimier & Maxi Krause (eds), 167–178. Caen: Presses Universitaires de Caen.Google Scholar
2010 Adverbial phrases. In A New Historical Syntax of Latin, Philip, Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 19–107. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2011 Human landmarks in spatial expressions: From Latin to Romance. In Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 99], Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds), 207–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Plotting diachronic semantic maps: The role of metaphor. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia, Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 99–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
1978 Ablative-locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics 14: 129–375.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana
2009 Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47: 1113–1141.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Spano, Marianna
2014 ‘Behind’ and ‘in front’ in Ancient Greek: A case study in orientation asymmetry. In On Ancient Grammars of Space: Linguistic Research on the Expression of Spatial Relations and Motion in Ancient Languages, Silvia Kutscher & Daniel Werning (eds), 67–82. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Noonan, Michael
2009 Patterns of development, patterns of syncretism of relational morphology in the Bodic languages. In The Role of Semantics and Pragmatics in the Development of Case [Studies in Language Companion Series 108], Jóhanna Barðdal & Shobhana L. Chelliah (eds), 261–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2010 The syntactic structure of locations, goals, and sources. Linguistics 48(5): 1043–1081.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Regier, Terry & Zheng, Mingyu
2007 Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 31: 705–719.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Rohde, Ada
2004 The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Studies in Linguistic Motivation, Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 249–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stolz, Thomas
1992 Lokalkasussysteme. Wilhelmsfeld: Gottfried Egert.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2010 A hierarchy of locations: Evidence from the encoding of direction in adpositions and cases. Linguistics 48: 983–1009.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar