Chapter published in:
Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 127146
References

References

Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2007On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29: 554–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Colin & Olson, Douglas
2004Aristophanes Thesmophoriazusae, edited with introduction and commentary. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Butler, Christopher
1985Statistics in Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1972Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C.
1987Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1933La formation des noms en grec ancien. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Colvin, Stephen
1999Dialect in Aristophanes. London: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfang U. & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
1994Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German, and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fögen, Thorsten
2004Gender-specific communication in Graeco-Roman Antiquity. With a research bibliography. Historiographia Linguistica 31(1): 199–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Female speech. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed.), 311–326. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra
1995Women, men and conversational narrative performances: Aspects of hender in Greek storytelling. Anthropological Linguistics 37(4): 460–486.Google Scholar
Gilleland, Michael E.
1980Female speech in Greek and Latin. The American Journal of Philology 101(2): 180–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grandi, Nicola
1998Sui suffissi diminutivi. Lingua e Stile 4: 627–653.Google Scholar
2014Diminutives/augmentatives (syntax and morphology). In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, Georgios K. Giannakis (ed.), 488–498. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Henderson, Jeffrey
1975The Maculate Muse. Obscene Language in Attic Comedy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
1987Aristophanes. Lysistrata, edited with introduction and commentary. Oxoford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hernández-Campoy, Juan Manuel & Conde Silvestre, Juan Camilo
2012The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jannaris, Antonius N.
1897An Historical Greek Grammar. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
1996Universals in the semantics of the diminutive. Berkeley Linguistics Society 19: 423–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin
2004Language and Woman’s Place, text and commentaries. Revised and expanded edition edited by Mary Bucholtz. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
MacDowell, Douglas M.
1995Aristophanes and Athens. An Introduction to the Plays. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Meluzzi, Chiara
2012“You” and “Me” in Ancient Greek: The case of three “female” comedies. In Greek and Latin from an Indo-European Perspective 3 (GLIEP 3) [Supplement of IJDL], Wojciech Sowa & Stefan Schaffner (eds), 81–100. Munich: Peniope.Google Scholar
2016Pragmatic use of ancient pronouns in two communicative frameworks. Pragmatics 26(3): 447–471. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Placencia, Maria Elena
2005Pragmatic variation in corner store interactions in Quito and Madrid. Hispania 88(3): 583–598. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sommerstein, Alan H.
1977Aristophanes and the Events of 411. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 97: 112–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995The languages of Athenian women. In Lo spettacolo delle voci. Vol. II, Francesco De Martino & Alan H. Sommerstein (eds), 61–85. Bari: Levante.Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1990You Just Don’t Understand. Women and Men in Conversation. London: Virago Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Wendy A.
1993Gringo…Gringita. Anthropological Quarterly 66(4): 187–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Willi, Andreas
2003The Languages of Aristophanes. Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wilson, Nigel G.
2007Aristophanis Fabulae, Recognovit Brevique Adnotatione Critica Instruxit, Tomus II [Oxford Classical Texts]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Redondo Moyano, María Elena
2021. (Des)cortesía verbal y caracterización en el tercer Mimiambo de Herodas. Cuadernos de Filología Clásica. Estudios griegos e indoeuropeos 31  pp. 67 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 09 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.