Chapter published in:
Exploring Intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives
Edited by Maria Napoli and Miriam Ravetto
[Studies in Language Companion Series 189] 2017
► pp. 231250
References

References

Athanasiadou, Angeliki
2007On the subjectivity of intensifiers. Language Sciences 29(4): 554–565. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter
2009On-line syntax. Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992The neverending sentence. Rightward expansion in spoken language. In Studies in Spoken Languages. English, German, Finno-Ugric, Miklós Kontra & Tamás Váradi (eds), 41–59. Budapest: Linguistics Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
1991Vom Ende deutscher Sätze. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 19: 139–157. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L.
1975How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2001Segnali discorsivi. In Grande grammatica Italiana di consultazione, III: Tipi di frase, deissi, formazione delle parole, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla, Caffi, Claudia and Sbisà, Marina
1991Scalar dimensions of illocutionary force. In Speech acts. Fiction or reality?, Igor Z. Zagar (ed.), 63–76. Ljubljana: IPRA Distribution Center for Jugoslavia.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cimaglia, Riccardo
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Ono, Tsuyoshi
2007‘Incrementing’ in conversation. A comparison of practices in English, German and Japanese. Pragmatics 17(4): 513–552. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cresti, Emanuela
2000Corpus di italiano parlato. Firenze: La Crusca.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
1994Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and other languages. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duden
20169. Die Grammatik, Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Ehlich, Konrad
1993Deutsch als fremde Wissenschaftssprache. Jahrbuch Deutsch als Fremdsprache 19: 13–42. Munich: Iudicium.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Davidse, Kristin
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives. Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 1(2): 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday life. New York NY: Doubleday and Company.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & McNally, Louise
2005Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81(2): 345–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salzmann, Katharina
2017. Expansionen in der deutschen und italienischen Wissenschaftssprache. Kontrastive Korpusanalyse und sprachdidaktische Überlegungen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Searle, John
1969Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret, Auer, Peter, Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar et al.
2009Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402. http://​www​.gespraechsforschung​-ozs​.de​/heft2009​/px​-gat2​.pdf. (19 June 2017).
Schegloff, Emanuel
1996Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, Elinor Ochs, Emanuel Schgeloff & Sandra Thompson (eds), 52–133. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Os, Charles
1989Aspekte der Intensivierung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Vorreiter, Susanne
2003Turn-continuations. Towards a Cross-Linguistic Classification. InLiSt 39. http://​www​.uni​-potsdam​.de​/u​/inlist​/issues​/39​/index​.htm (19 June 2017).
Weinrich, Harald
20053. Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Hildesheim: Georg Holms.Google Scholar