Chapter 5
Quapropter, quaeso? ‘Why, for pity’s sake?’
Questions and the pragmatic functions of quaeso, obsecro, and amabo in Plautus
This contribution aims to shed further light on some well-studied deverbal Latin Pragmatic Markers (PMs), that is, procedural elements originally derived from verbs which become frozen in form and acquired new intersubjective meanings. In particular, I will focus on quaeso, obsecro, and amabo ‘please’ in Plautus, which have been widely discussed in the relevant literature above all with regard to their primary function, namely that of politeness markers softening the illocutionary force of orders and requests, and in relation to their sociolinguistic distribution. In this study, I shall focus rather on the less widely studied values developed by quaeso, obsecro, and amabo when used in questions in Plautus. The data show that these markers express a range of meanings which go far beyond politeness and the illocutionary functions of mitigation, coming to convey a variety of personal stances, strengthening of pragmatic force and even (mock) impoliteness, thus realizing a sort of “pragmatic reversal” (in the words of Mazzon 2007).
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Object of investigation
- 1.2State of the art and aims of the present study
-
1.3Pragmatic markers and their analysis in a classical language
- 2.Theoretical framework: Speech Acts and Pragmatic Macrofunctions
- 2.1Speech Acts
-
2.2Pragmatic macrofunctions
- 3.A functional account of quaeso, obsecro, and amabo in questions
- 3.1Subtypes of questions
- 3.2Referential questions
- 3.3Directive interrogatives
- 3.4Expressive interrogatives
-
4.Discussion
-
5.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
References (45)
References
Adams, James N.
1984 Female speech in Latin comedy.
Antichthon 18: 43–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adams, James N.
2003 Bilingualism and the Latin Language. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, Karin
2013 Understanding Pragmatic Markers: A Variational Pragmatic Approach. Edinburgh: EUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, Karin
2015 “Will you fuck off please”. The use of please by London teenagers.
Sociocultural Pragmatics 3(2): 127–149.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anipa, Kormi
2012 The use of literary sources in historical sociolinguistic research. In
The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics,
Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy &
Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), 170–190. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Oxford. Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrios-Lech, Peter G.
2016 Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boyce, Bret
1991 The Language of the Freedmen in Petronius’ Cena Trimalchionis. Leiden: Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J.
1996 Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Paul, Joseph, Brian & Wallace, Rex
2009 Questions and answers. In
New perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence,
Philip Baldi &
Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 489–530. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cabrillana, Concepción
2004 Forma lingüística y tipo de personaje en la comedia terenciana. In
Registros lingüísticos en las lenguas clásicas,
Antonio López Eire &
Agustín Ramos Guerreira (eds), 11–31. Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cabrillana, Concepción
2008 Vocativo y participantes en el acto de habla en la comedia latina y la novela de Petronio. In
Latin Vulgaire – Latin Tardif VIII,
Roger Wright (ed.), 69–77. Hildesheim: Olms-Weidmann.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan
2011 Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan & Archer, Dawn
Dickey, Eleanor
2002 Latin Forms of Address: From Plautus to Apuleius. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickey, Eleanor
2012 How to say ‘please’ in Classical Latin.
Classical Quarterly 62(2): 731–748.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dickey, Eleanor
2015 How to say ‘please’ in post-Classical Latin: Fronto and the importance of archaism.
Journal of Latin Linguistics 14(1): 17–31.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dutsch, Dorota M.
2008 Feminine Discourse in Roman Comedy. On Echoes and Voices. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elspass, Stephan
2012 The use of private letters and diaries in sociolinguistic investigation. In
The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics,
Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy &
Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds), 156–169. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fedriani, Chiara & Ghezzi, Chiara
2014 The pragmaticalization of verbs of movement and exchange in Latin and Italian: Paths of development from lexicon to pragmatics. In
Studia linguistica et philologica in honorem Prof. Univ. Dr. Michaela Livescu,
Ilona Badescu &
Mihaela Popescu (eds), 116–139. Craiova: Editura Universitaria.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferri, Rolando
2008a Politeness in Latin comedy: Some preliminary thoughts.
Materiali e discussioni 61: 15–28.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ferri, Rolando
2008b Il latino dei Colloquia scholica. In
Aspetti della scuola nel mondo romano,
Rolando Ferri &
Franco Bellandi (eds), 111–177. Amsterdam: Hakkert.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghezzi, Chiara
2014 The development of discourse and pragmatic markers. In
Discourse and Pragmatic Markers from Latin to the Romance Languages,
Chiara Ghezzi &
Piera Molinelli (eds), 10–26. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghezzi, Chiara & Molinelli, Piera
Gilleland, Michael E.
1979 Linguistic Differentiation of Character Type and Sex in the Comedies of Plautus and Terence. PhD dissertation, University of Virginia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hall, Jon
2009 Politeness and Politics in Cicero’s Letters. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hofmann, Johann Baptist
2003 La lingua d’uso latina. Introduction, translation and notes by Licinia Ricottili, 3rd edn. Bologna: Pàtron (=
Lateinische Umgangssprache, Heidelberg, 1951, 3rd edn).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karakasis, Evangelos
2005 Terence and the Language of the Roman Comedy. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maltby, Robert
1976 A Comparative Study of the Language of Plautus and Terence. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mazzon, Gabriella
2017 Paths of development of English DMs: (Inter)subjectification, deontic reversal and other stories. In
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives [Studies in Language Companion
Series 186],
Chiara Fedriani &
Andrea Sansò (eds), 289–304. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molinelli, Piera
2015 Dialoghi a distanza e pragmatica: Marcatori funzionali e lettere private in latino e in greco. In
Lingue e contesti. Studi in onore di Alberto M. Mioni,
Maria Grazia Busà &
Sara Gesuato (eds), 609–621. Padova: CLEUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molinelli, Piera
2016 Cicli di pragmaticalizzazione tra latino e lingue romanze: la formazione di marcatori interazionali. In
Actes du XXVIIe
Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes
289–304 (Nancy, 15–20 juillet 2013),
Éva Buchi,
Jean-Paul Chauveau &
Jean-Marie Pierrel (eds), 149–160. Strasbourg: Société de linguistique romane.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Molinelli, Piera
2017 Marcatori pragmatici richiestivi in Plauto: Una sfida per la traduzione in francese, italiano, rumeno e spagnolo. In
Di tutti i colori. Studi linguistici per Maria Grossmann,
Roberta D’Alessandro,
Gabriele Iannàccaro,
Diana Passino,
Anna M. Thornton (eds), 217–229. Utrecht: Utrecht University Repository.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Roman
1997 Sprechen und Sprache: Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Núñez, Darmstadt S.
1995 Materiales para una sociología de la lengua latina: Terencio y los modificadores de imperativo.
Florentia Iliberritana 6: 347–366.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinkster, Harm
2015 The Oxford Latin Syntax. Vol. 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Risselada, Rodie
1993 Imperatives and Other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Risselada, Rodie
2005 Particles in questions. In
Latina Lingua! Proceedings of the 12th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics,
Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 663–679. Roma: Herder.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rosén, Hannah
2009 Coherence, sentence modification, and sentence-part modification: the contribution of particles. Syntax, sociolinguistics, and literary genres.
New Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: Syntax of the Sentence,
Philip Baldi &
Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 317–442. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, John
1975 Indirect speech acts. In
Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts,
Peter Cole &
Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 59–82. New York NY: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Unceta Gómez, Luis
2009 La petición verbal en latín, Estudio léxico, semántico y pragmático. Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Unceta Gómez, Luis
2015 Sobre el proceso de subjetivación de algunas formas verbales en la lengua de la comedia romana. In
Latin Linguistics in the Early 21st Century, Gerd Haverling (ed.), 468–479. Uppsala: Uppsala University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Fedriani, Chiara
2021.
Conditional clauses as polite modifiers in Latin:si placetbetween pragmaticalization and language contact.
Transactions of the Philological Society 119:3
► pp. 346 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.