Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek
Edited by Camille Denizot and Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 190] 2017
► pp. 235–256

Chapter 11
Polar questions in Latin with and without the enclitic particle -ne

| Thesaurus linguae Latinae | Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Munich

The Latin enclitic particle -ne, which may be of an affirmative origin, is an optional focusing particle of polar questions, which in Latin can also occur without any particle. To analyse polar questions I have distinguished four groups of questions in the comedies of Plautus and Terence, according to pragmatic criteria. Both kinds of questions can occur in all groups, but questions without a particle have a stronger tendency to appear among those related to the speech situation, questions with a particle among those with a directive force. Moreover, as has often been observed, the particle -ne seems to be preferred in combination with certain host words. I have checked whether these are also frequent in the first position of interrogative sentences without -ne.

Keywords: polar questions, interrogative particle, -ne , enclitic, focusing particle
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data: Corpus A
    • 2.1Distribution of -ne
    • 2.2Diachrony
  • 3.Corpus B: Direct simple polar questions in Plautus and Terence
  • 4.Function of questions with -ne and without any particle
    • 4.1Four groups of questions
      • 4.1.1External questions, asking for new information
      • 4.1.2Questions related to the situation of the speech
      • 4.1.3Questions with directive force
      • 4.1.4Questions with expressive/assertive force
    • 4.2 -ne in exclamatory sentences
    • 4.3Comparison
  • 5.Frequent combinations of host word and -ne
  • 6.Etymology
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 1 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.190.11sch
References
Álvarez Huerta, Olga
2012 Latín nē y -nĕ: ¿una o dos partículas? Linguarum Varietas 1: 91–98.Google Scholar
Anderson, Andrew R.
1913 Repudiative questions in Greek drama, and in Plautus and Terence. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 44: 43–64.Google Scholar
1914 The unity of the enclitic ne . Classical Philology 9(2): 174–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Banfi, Emanuele
1997 Per l’etimologia di lat. ne, marca di interrogazione. In Miscillo flamine: studi in onore di Carmelo Rapisarda, Antonella Degl’Innocenti & Gabriella Moretti (eds), 45–51. Trento: Università degli studi di Trento.Google Scholar
Barrios-Lech, Peter
2016 Linguistic Interaction in Roman Comedy. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barsby, John
1999 Terence, Eunuchus. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Terence, 2 Vols [Loeb Classical Library]. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bodelot, Colette
1987 L’interrogation indirecte en latin: Syntaxe, valeur illocutoire, formes. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
1990 Termes introducteurs et modes dans l’interrogation indirecte en latin de Plaute à Juvénal. Avignon: Aubanel.Google Scholar
Calboli, Gualtiero
1981 Le frasi interrogativo-esclamative e l’infinito. In Logos semantikos, studia linguistica in honorem Eugenio Coseriu, IV: Grammatik, Christian Rohrer (ed.), 133–153. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George E.
2014 Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominalstämme. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & Meillet, Antoine
1985 Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine: Histoire des mots, 4th edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Freed, Alice F.
1994 The form and function of questions in informal dyadic conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 21(6): 621–644. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoff, François
1984 Le système linguistique de l’interrogation en latin classique. In L’interrogation. Actes du colloque tenu les 19 et 20 décembre 1983 par le Département de linguistique de Paris-Sorbonne, Paul Valentin (ed.), 17–35. Paris: Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Szantyr, Anton
1972 Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: Beck.Google Scholar
Janson, Tore
1979 Mechanisms of Language Change in Latin. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Kauer, Robert, Lindsay, Wallace M. & Skutsch, Otto
1958 P. Terenti Afri Comoediae. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline & Risselada, Rodie
2002 Phasality, polarity, focality: A feature analysis of the Latin particle iam . Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16: 65–78.Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Stegmann, Carl
1912–1914 Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache, Part II: Satzlehre, 2 Vols. Hannover: Hahn.Google Scholar
LASLA: Laboratoire d’Analyse Statistique des Langues Anciennes
Université de Liège. [URL]
Leo, Friedrich
1895–1896 Plauti comoediae, 2 Vols. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
LLT: Library of Latin Texts
(2013) Brepols, Turnhout [URL].Google Scholar
Lodge, Gonzalez
1933 Lexicon Plautinum, Vol. 2. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
de Melo, Wolfgang
2011–2013 Plautus [Loeb Classical Library], 5 Vols. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Edward P.
1889/90 On the sentence-question in Plautus and Terence. American Journal of Philology 10(4): 397–436, 11(1): 16–54, 11(2): 145–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Roman
1997 Sprechen und Sprache: Dialoglinguistische Studien zu Terenz. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
OLD
: P. Glare (ed.) Oxford Latin Dictionary (1968–1982) Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Orlandini, Anna
2001 Négation et argumentation en latin [Grammaire Fondamentale du Latin 8]. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Pinkster, Harm
2015 Oxford Latin Syntax, Vol. 1: The Simple Clause. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richmond, Jan
1965 A note on the elision of final ĕ in certain particles used by Latin poets. Glotta 43(1–2): 78–103.Google Scholar
Risselada, Rodie
1993 Imperatives and other Directive Expressions in Latin: A Study in the Pragmatics of a Dead Language. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
2005 Particles in questions. In Latina Lingua! Papers on grammar IX, Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), 663–679. Rome: Herder.Google Scholar
Schrickx, Josine
2014 1. -ne. ThLL , Vol. 9(1): 260, 66–279, 49.Google Scholar
Spevak, Olga
2006 Les enclitiques en latin. Indogermanische Forschungen 111: 249–274.Google Scholar
2010 Constituent Order in Classical Latin Prose [Studies in Language Companion Series 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
ThLL: Thesaurus linguae Latinae
(1900ff.) Leipzig/Munich: Teubner/De Gruyter.Google Scholar
de Vaan, Michiel
2008 Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages [Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series]. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Vairel-Carron, Hélène
1975 Exclamation. Ordre et défense. Analyse de deux systèmes syntaxiques du latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Walde, Alois, & Hofmann, Johann Baptist
1954 Lateinisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Wingo Otha, E.
1972 Latin Punctuation in the Classical Age [Janua Linguarum Series Practica 133]. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar