Chapter published in:
Pragmatic Approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek
Edited by Camille Denizot and Olga Spevak
[Studies in Language Companion Series 190] 2017
► pp. 273302
Allan, Rutger J.
2013Exploring modality’s semantic space: Grammaticalisation, subjectification and the case of ὀφείλω. Glotta: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Tense and aspect in classical Greek. Two historical developments: Augment and perfect. In The Greek Verb Revisited. A Fresh Approach to Biblical Exegesis, Steven E. Runge & Christopher J. Fresch (eds), 81–121. Bellingham: Lexham Press.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The history of the future. In The Greek Future and its History, Frédéric Lambert, Rutger J. Allan & Theodore Markopoulos eds Louvain Peeters
Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Ducrot, Oswald
1977Deux mais en français? Lingua 43(1): 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983L’argumentation dans la langue. Brussels: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Bakker, Egbert J.
1993Boundaries, topics and the structure of discourse. An onvestigation of the Ancient Greek particle de . Studies in Language 17(2): 275–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Basset, Louis
1997Ἀλλ’ ἐξόλοισθ’ αὐτῷ κοαξ. Réexamen des emplois de ἀλλά dans les Grenouilles d’Aristophane. In New Approaches to Greek particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 75–99. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1993Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: A tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition. Computational Linguistics 19(3): 531–8.Google Scholar
Bonifazi, Anna
2012Homer’s Versicolored Fabric. The Evocative Power of Ancient Greek Epic Word-Making. Cambridge MA: Center for Hellenic Studies.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1996Using Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, D. Alan
1992Monosemy vs. polysemy. Linguistics 30: 577–99.Google Scholar
Denniston, John D.
1954The Greek Particles, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Drummen, Annemieke
2009Discourse cohesion in dialogue. Turn-initial ἀλλά in Greek Drama. In Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek, Stéphanie J. Bakker & Gerry C. Wakker (eds), 135–69. Leiden: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Dramatic Pragmatics. A Discourse Approach to Particle Use in Ancient Greek Tragedy and Comedy. PhD dissertation, University of Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Gries, Stephan T.
2010Behavioral profiles: A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics. The Mental Lexicon 5(3): 323–46.Google Scholar
2015Polysemy. In Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Ewa Dąbrowska & Dagmar Divjak (eds), 472–490. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacquinod, Bernard
1997Sur le rôle pragmatique de καίτοι. In New Approaches to Greek Particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 131–49. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Kroon, Caroline
1995Discourse Particles in Latin. A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
2008Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, Robin T.
1971Ifs, ands and buts about conjunction. In Studies in Semantics, Charles Fillmore & Terence Langendoen (eds), 114–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2004Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrastive marking. Journal of Semantics 21: 177–198.Google Scholar
Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra. A.
1988Rhetorical structure theory. Towards a functional theory of text organization. TEXT 8(3): 243–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauri, Caterina
2008Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
1998The Function of Discourse Particles. A Study with Special Reference to Spoken Standard French. [Pragmatics and Beyond New Series 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riemer, Nick
2005The Semantics of Polysemy: Reading Meaning in English and Warlpiri. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rudolph, Elisabeth
1996Contrast. Adversative and Concessive Expressions on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, Spooren, Wilbert & Noordman, Leo
1992Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse processes 15(1): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sicking, Chistiaan & van Ophuijsen, Johannes M.
1993Two Studies in Attic particle usage. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Slings, Simon R.
1997Adversative relators between PUSH and POP. In New Approaches to Greek Particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 101–29. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Strassler, Robert B.
(ed.) 1998The Landmark Thucydides. A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War. New York NY: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
2002Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2003Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2012The Mental Corpus. How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1999The role of pragmatics in semantic change. In Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. II, Jef Verschueren (ed.), 93–102, Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.Google Scholar
2004Historical pragmatics. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 538–61, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.
2002Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie
2005Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wakker, Gerry C.
1997Emphasis and affirmation. some aspects of μήν in tragedy. In New Approaches to Greek Particles, Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 209–31. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

La Roi, Ezra
2020. The Variation of Classical Greek Wishes. Glotta 96:1  pp. 213 ff. Crossref logo
Sluiter, Ineke
2021.  In The Language of Argumentation [Argumentation Library, 36],  pp. 243 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 march 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.