Chapter 13
Ancient Greek adversative particles in contrast
Ancient Greek is a language which abounds in discourse particles showing a wide range of functions. This paper aims at analyzing the semantic differences between the most frequent adversative particles in Greek: allá, kaítoi, méntoi and mé:n. Drawing on a number of functionally and cognitively-oriented theoretical approaches to pragmatics, I will argue that these particles can best be analyzed as polysemous networks of semantic extensions resulting from the semanticization of contextually evoked pragmatic inferences. I will also argue that the semantic distinction between the various adversative particles can be insightfully described in terms of discourse-pragmatic notions such as common ground, topos, discourse act and move.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction and theoretical background
- 2.A typology of adversative relations
- 3.
Allá
- 4.
Méntoi
- 5.
Kaítoi
-
6.
Mé:n
- 7.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References
Allan, Rutger J.
2013 Exploring modality’s semantic space: Grammaticalisation, subjectification and the case of ὀφείλω.
Glotta: 1–46.


Allan, Rutger J.
2016 Tense and aspect in classical Greek. Two historical developments: Augment and perfect. In
The Greek Verb Revisited. A Fresh Approach to Biblical Exegesis,
Steven E. Runge &
Christopher J. Fresch (eds), 81–121. Bellingham: Lexham Press.

Allan, Rutger J.
Forthcoming.
The history of the future. In
The Greek Future and its History,
Frédéric Lambert,
Rutger J. Allan &
Theodore Markopoulos eds Louvain Peeters
Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Ducrot, Oswald
1977 Deux mais en français? Lingua
43(1): 1–43.


Anscombre, Jean-Claude & Ducrot, Oswald
1983 L’argumentation dans la langue. Brussels: Mardaga.

Basset, Louis
1997 Ἀλλ’ ἐξόλοισθ’ αὐτῷ κοαξ. Réexamen des emplois de ἀλλά dans les Grenouilles d’Aristophane. In
New Approaches to Greek particles,
Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 75–99. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.

Biber, Douglas
1993 Co-occurrence patterns among collocations: A tool for corpus-based lexical knowledge acquisition.
Computational Linguistics 19(3): 531–8.

Bonifazi, Anna
2012 Homer’s Versicolored Fabric. The Evocative Power of Ancient Greek Epic Word-Making. Cambridge MA: Center for Hellenic Studies.

Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.


Clark, Herbert H.
1996 Using Language. Cambridge: CUP.


Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP.


Cruse, D. Alan
1992 Monosemy vs. polysemy.
Linguistics 30: 577–99.

Denniston, John D.
1954 The Greek Particles, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Drummen, Annemieke
2009 Discourse cohesion in dialogue. Turn-initial ἀλλά in Greek Drama. In
Discourse Cohesion in Ancient Greek,
Stéphanie J. Bakker &
Gerry C. Wakker (eds), 135–69. Leiden: Brill.


Drummen, Annemieke
2015 Dramatic Pragmatics. A Discourse Approach to Particle Use in Ancient Greek Tragedy and Comedy. PhD dissertation, University of Heidelberg.

Gries, Stephan T.
2010 Behavioral profiles: A fine-grained and quantitative approach in corpus-based lexical semantics.
The Mental Lexicon 5(3): 323–46.

Gries, Stephan T.
2015 Polysemy. In
Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics,
Ewa Dąbrowska &
Dagmar Divjak (eds), 472–490. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Hengeveld, Kees & Mackenzie, J. Lachlan
2008 Functional Discourse Grammar. A Typologically-based Theory of Language Structure. Oxford: OUP.


Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003 Grammaticalization, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.


Jacquinod, Bernard
1997 Sur le rôle pragmatique de καίτοι. In
New Approaches to Greek Particles,
Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 131–49. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.

Kroon, Caroline
1995 Discourse Particles in Latin. A Study of nam, enim, autem, vero and at. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.

Langacker, Ronald W.
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol I:
Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald W.
2008 Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford: OUP.


Lakoff, Robin T.
1971 Ifs, ands and buts about conjunction. In
Studies in Semantics,
Charles Fillmore &
Terence Langendoen (eds), 114–49. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Malchukov, Andrej
2004 Towards a semantic typology of adversative and contrastive marking.
Journal of Semantics 21: 177–198.

Mann, William C. & Thompson, Sandra. A.
1988 Rhetorical structure theory. Towards a functional theory of text organization.
TEXT 8(3): 243–81.


Mauri, Caterina
2008 Coordination Relations in the Languages of Europe and Beyond. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.


Mosegaard Hansen, Maj-Britt
Riemer, Nick
2005 The Semantics of Polysemy: Reading Meaning in English and Warlpiri. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Rudolph, Elisabeth
1996 Contrast. Adversative and Concessive Expressions on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Sanders, Ted, Spooren, Wilbert & Noordman, Leo
1992 Toward a taxonomy of coherence relations.
Discourse processes 15(1): 1–35.


Sicking, Chistiaan & van Ophuijsen, Johannes M.
1993 Two Studies in Attic particle usage. Leiden: Brill.

Slings, Simon R.
1997 Adversative relators between PUSH and POP. In
New Approaches to Greek Particles,
Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 101–29. Amsterdam: Gieben.

Strassler, Robert B.
(ed.) 1998 The Landmark Thucydides. A Comprehensive Guide to the Peloponnesian War. New York NY: Touchstone.

Taylor, John R.
2002 Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: OUP.

Taylor, John R.
2003 Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: OUP.

Taylor, John R.
2012 The Mental Corpus. How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: OUP.


Traugott, Elizabeth C.
1999 The role of pragmatics in semantic change. In
Pragmatics in 1998: Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference, Vol. II,
Jef Verschueren (ed.), 93–102, Antwerp: International Pragmatics Association.

Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2004 Historical pragmatics. In
The Handbook of Pragmatics,
Laurence R. Horn &
Gregory Ward (eds), 538–61, Oxford: Blackwell.

Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.
2002 Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.

Verhagen, Arie
2005 Constructions of Intersubjectivity. Discourse, Syntax, and Cognition. Oxford: OUP.

Wakker, Gerry C.
1997 Emphasis and affirmation. some aspects of μήν in tragedy. In
New Approaches to Greek Particles,
Albert Rijksbaron (ed.), 209–31. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.

Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
Breunesse, Merlijn & Margherita Fantoli
2022.
Quia, quoniam, and information management in Plautus.
Journal of Latin Linguistics 21:2
► pp. 163 ff.

La Roi, Ezra
2020.
The Variation of Classical Greek Wishes.
Glotta 96:1
► pp. 213 ff.

Sluiter, Ineke
2021.
Old Is the New New: The Rhetoric of Anchoring Innovation. In
The Language of Argumentation [
Argumentation Library, 36],
► pp. 243 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.